If you look at the Mustelidae Wikipedia page, there is reference to a subfamily Naquinae, but none of the 7 species have their own pages and neither do their genus. Most of them are called capecats, and I can't find anything about any of them by Googling. Anybody have any more information on these creatures?
So I think it's about time to make a new subfamily to the Scansoriopterygidae and therefore I introduce to you the Yiinae which it includes Yi qi, Ambopteryx, and Epidexipteryx where it can be split even further into the Yiini tribe which only includes Yi qi and Ambopteryx
Answers I find online are not consistent.
Sources that say yes:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/the-korean-crevice-salamander/
'(Hemidactylium scutatum), the only extant member of its lineage (and hence sometimes given its own ‘subfamily’, Hemidactylinae)'
http://tolweb.org/Hemidactylinae/15534
'The subfamily Hemidactylinae contains a single representative, Hemidactylium scutatum (taxonomy after Chippindale et al., 2004).'
Sources that say no:
https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=773221#null
https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/787564-Hemidactyliinae
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plethodontidae#Subfamilies_and_genera
There's like a zillion genera listed under the Hemidactylinae subfamily here. No idea where the extra 'i' in the subfamily name comes from here though (and in the article below). I think Wikipedia is using this as its underlying source:
https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/65/1/66/2461464
I've gone through the article and it doesn't seem to me that listing all these salamanders under Hemidactylinae is something new they're proposing? My understanding is that the major taxonomic rearrangement their research is proposing is that "the position of the enigmatic eastern North American four-toed salamander (Hemidactylium) as the sister taxon of Batrachoseps + Tribe Bolitoglossini ... Furthermore, we statistically reject sister taxon status of Karsenia and Hydromantes ..." This doesn't really sound like they're proposing a bunch of species be dumped into the subfamily Hemidactylinae.
I'm really confused. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
In the twab, Chris mentions high impact getting lower total damage per burst.
Here are the accurate numbers of how much the fusion rifle subfamilies will do:
Rapid fire frame: 9 bolts (29.4 dmg per bolt)
High impact frame: 5 bolts (62 dmg per bolt)
Adaptive frame: 7 bolts (38.6 dmg per bolt)
Precision frame: 7 bolts (40 dmg per bolt)
These are the pvp damage numbers btw.
The source of these numbers are from the recent Podcast ,,Destiny Massive Breakdown" with Chris Proctor (Lead weapon design) discussing the weapons twab this week.
The exact time he talks about the damage numbers if anybodys is interested, is at 47:30 into the podcast. :)
In the twab, Chris mentions high impact getting lower total damage per burst.
Here are the accurate numbers of how much the fusion rifle subfamilies will do:
Rapid fire frame: 9 bolts (29.4 dmg per bolt)
High impact frame: 5 bolts (62 dmg per bolt)
Adaptive frame: 7 bolts (38.6 dmg per bolt)
Precision frame: 7 bolts (40 dmg per bolt)
These are the pvp damage numbers btw.
The source of these numbers are from the recent Podcast ,,Destiny Massive Breakdown" with Chris Proctor (Lead weapon design) discussing the weapons twab this week.
The exact time he talks about the damage numbers if anybodys is interested, is at 47:30 into the podcast. :)
