Opinion: Armeniaβs role in this 1956;1968 like intervention will negatively affect her diplomatic image. Also Itβs kinda sad to see such an announcement from the politician came to the power through similar struggle. Moscow-led bloc to send 'peacekeeping forces' to protest-hit Kazakhstan
This is your 16-minute Friday report in 4115 words.
##Pashinyan about the Nagorno Karabakh negotiation process and the "diplomatic disaster" of 2016:
Throughout the negotiation process, NK has never been viewed as a territory where only Armenians would live. The issue of the Azeri population has been part of the negotiations.
The referendum was never going to be held according to our liking, but even if it were, NK's Azeri population would also take part. Now the question is, would the Azeris of NK, in their turn, be allowed to [break away from NK via a similar process]. What would happen if that question was raised? These are not abstract questions. It's based on the nuances of what was on the negotiation table, which has never been discussed in public.
Today we hear voices, thoughts, and cherrypicked sentences that, in fact, have nothing to do with the package of negotiations that we had as of 2018.
3 packages were offered in 2016, and for the first time since 2011, NK's interim status was not part of it. Sure, NK would have a legislature, judiciary, etc. But no one is mentioning that the issue of clarifying NK's interim status, according to that negotiation logic, was transferred to the UN Security Council. What is the problem with that?
Throughout the entire negotiation process, Armenia attempted to keep the final resolution within the OSCE Minsk Group framework. In 2016 the parameters to solve the issue were transferred to the UN Security Council.
Pay attention to Levon Ter-Petrosyan's 2017 interview to H1. He mentions that the international community will decide NK's status.
[What decision would the UN Security Council make?] The question is, part of which country will NK remain before its final status is resolved? When it's the UN Security Council handling it, the outcome is very predictable, because in 1993 they adopted a resolution stating that NK is part of Azerbaijan and that they recognize Azerbaijan's territorial integrity.
This is the 2016 disaster. Under this logic, NK's final resolution must be handled per the Azerbaijani constitution.
Reporter: NK has never been part of independent Azerbaijan. Are you saying the UN Security Council accepts NK as part of Azerbaijan?
Pashinyan: Yes. The documents are open for everyone to read.
Reporter: what happened between 2016-2018, and after 2018?
Pashinyan: Serj Sargsyan revealed that the negotiation process didn't inspir
... keep reading on reddit β‘
This is about Dwight Eisenhower decided to peacefully be resigned from President of US by the time the 6th anniversary of founding of People's Republic of China in our TL. VP Richard Nixon took over as Interim President of USA.
Based on the discussion, it was clear that concerns raised about security influenced the councilors. Thank you to those who submitted written comments.
Albania, Brazil, Gabon, Ghana, and the United Arab Emirates joined the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday, formally taking up positions won in a June election. Gabon, Ghana, and the UAE have each served on the council three times.
https://knowafrika.com/gabon-and-ghana-have-joined-the-powerful-un-security-council/
I've never been this major of a country before especially in unsc and it's kinda nerve wrecking even though I have a fair amount of experience HAHAH any forms of tips will be greatly appreciated :) fyi in case anyone is wondering the agenda is the myanmar coup!
Permanent Members: Winners of WW2 China, US, Britain, France, Russia(all of them nuclear power)
For G4: There have been proposals suggesting the introduction of new permanent members. The candidates usually mentioned are Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. They compose the group of four countries known as the G4 nations, which mutually support one another's bids for permanent seats.
This sort of reform has traditionally been opposed by the Uniting for Consensus group, which is composed primarily of nations that are regional rivals and economic competitors of the G4. The group is composed of Italy and Spain (opposing Germany), Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina (opposing Brazil), Pakistan (opposing India), and South Korea (opposing Japan), in addition to Turkey, Indonesia and others. Since 1992, Italy and other council members have instead proposed semi-permanent seats or expanding the number of temporary seats.
How long will this system last? will it disappear? Or will it change? What are your thoughts on the fact that no Muslim country have this seat?
Albania, Brazil, Gabon, Ghana, and the United Arab Emirates joined the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday, formally taking up positions won in a June election. Gabon, Ghana, and the UAE have each served on the council three times.
https://knowafrika.com/gabon-and-ghana-have-joined-the-powerful-un-security-council/
