Citizens of the Republic, as your Prime Minister I have introduced to Parliament the Republic Defence Force Act. This bill will establish a national armed forces, for the protection of the people of the Republic. The bill is below:
"The Prime Minister shall on behalf of the Federal Government establish, command, and maintain a national armed forces to defend, maintain, and secure the safety of the citizens of the Republic."
There are some executives in this nation - even from my own party - who strongly oppose having a Republic Defence Force. Why is this so?
Is it, perhaps, because they like wearing military attire? Is it, perhaps, because they do not respect the authority of Parliament, the Great Forum of universal political representation?
Maybe those executives would rather their province was not a part of the Republic at all? If so, they have every right to hold a referendum and leave.
However.
If those people want their province to enjoy the benefits of being in a federation such as ours - not a confederation, not a unitary state - they must respect the will of the people, expressed through Parliament, and respect the Federal Government's constitutional responsibility to provide for the defence of the Republic.
There is no need for provincial militaries. How can we call ourselves a federation if we are constantly on the brink of internal war? At most, the provinces should have provincial guards (militias reserved for states of emergency).
In the end, the constitutional convention widely agreed that it was in the Federal Government's power to maintain a military, and it was in the provinces' powers to maintain Provincial Guards.
A final message to the wannabe military generals - stop. Tens of millions have died from this militarism, and we cannot keep the nation together in this state.
What is the Philippines Data Privacy Act?
Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the Philippines Data Privacy Act. This is a law that seeks to protect all forms of information, be it private, personal, or sensitive. It is meant to cover both natural and juridical persons involved in the processing of personal information.
What is Data Privacy?
Data privacy is the right of an individual not to have private information about himself disclosed. It is to live free from surveillance and intrusion.
All companies handle some form of personal information, from employee to client to end-user data. Thus, all companies are now responsible to protect confidentiality, preserve integrity, and promote the availability of data for authorized use.
How Do We Comply?
All personal data must be:
Collected with the customer’s proper consent.
Solely used for its intended purposes.
Have legitimate reasons for the collection that must be clear to both parties giving and receiving information. Be protected and secured from collection to proper disposal avoiding access from unauthorized parties.
Nakita ko siya sa isang video at ang act na ito ay pinoprotektahan ang mga tao, babae man o lalaki, mula sa pangungutya, pambabastos at pananakit sa kanila base sa kasarian nila ng ibang mga tao. Sa nutshell ang ganda niyang act, pero bakit hindi ito laganap at kilala sa lgbt community? Parang one size fits all na ito sa lahat na diskriminasyon na ibinabato sa atin araw araw.
I'm not which is legit when I browse in google.
Introduced: Sponsor: Rep. Michael Cloud [R-TX27]
This bill was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs which will consider it before sending it to the House floor for consideration.
^- ^Second ^World ^War ^tweets ^from ^1943 ^(@RealTimeWWII) ^| ^September ^23, ^2021
#1st December, 1946
In response to a personal request to President Renner by German-based conglomerate Pangermanisch Brauerei, the Austrian parliament has debated and voted on the matter concerning said conglomerate's future potential operations in Austrian territory. It has been agreed that the matter was worthy of debate and vote in parliament following the radical nationalisation and forced union of breweries seen in the Soviet occupation zone, something which this government deems to be of particular danger should a similar decision be made for the Soviet occupation zone in Austria. Given that approximately 90% of national vineyards and wineries fall under the present jurisdiction of the Soviet Union, any such forced and sudden conglomeration would have dramatic effects felt nationwide, and not just in the east of Austria. Equally, the introduction of Pangermanisch Brauerei to Austrian businesses may prove just as impactful given their incredibly rapid and decisive domination of certain sectors already witnessed across Germany.
Thus, to avoid a dramatic shift in national sectors, particularly of Wines and Beers which are relevant to PB interests, the Austrian parliament concluded that clear regulations and stipulations must be established before either of these outcomes are realised.
After some debate, recesses, and back and fourth spanning a number of days, the Austrian parliament has finally come to a consensus regarding proposed regulations of businesses and conglomerates working with Austria's vineyards, wineries, and breweries. The following stipulations are to be proposed so as to protect the Austrian domestic Beer and Wine sector, workers in said industries, and against international monopolies such that new businesses may be given a chance to flourish:
-
So as to ensure fair and competitive business arrangements regarding supply and production in Austria, a minimum of 25% of all wine and beer related production facilities (e.g. vineyards, wineries, and breweries) in Austrian territory must be maintained independently of any national or international conglomerates, franchises, and organisations. The minimum independent establishments may still cooperate in relevant affairs and establish fair and legal agreements with national or international conglomerates, franchises, and organisations, however they will be regulated and restricted from becoming direct affiliates of or being absorbed by them.
-
Any foreign or Austrian-based
Pinaaalalahanan na wag o iwasan na magpost ng mga ID, student card, certificate, at iba pang dokumento na naglalaman ng personal na impormasyon sa iba't ibang online/sharing platforms.
https://preview.redd.it/jqdfm1oe4yf71.jpg?width=2000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36c26a8a4194d5366cd21237c732cf3938961bb5
I’m having a hard time finding loopholes in the RAs that I read but I really need to find one that I can be used for my requirement. Thank you so much.
