I won't be able to afford it for much longer.
What makes it even sadder is that my anti-depressants are causing sexual dysfunction, so more than half the time I fail to orgasm or even maintain an erection long enough for intercourse. I'm also ashamed of my overweight figure, so having to get naked is not ideal.
I feel guilty for keeping it a secret from my wife, but I don't think she would approve. I feel sorry that I don't see extramarital sex the same way as I believe she does, or that I am too cowardly to have a honest discussion about it. I mostly feel bad for how much money I've spent on it over the years.
The utility of layer 2 solutions in scaling ETH in its current iteration is obvious. But once ETH transitions to POS and sharding is possible, will there still be a role for layer 2 solutions (which seem to be mostly about scaling)?
On a related question, is there a good resource comparing the various layer 2 solutions?
TL;DR at bottom.
Apes are trying to crash the manipulated market by removing enough physical that it can't continue.
Meanwhile investors/speculators are out there treating Paper Silver as if it was Physical Silver in the belief that they can trade their paper for physical either at any time, or at a set time soon to arrive.
In the additional meanwhile, the Basel III freight train is barreling down the tracks -- next stop June 28 for the EU, which includes some number of bullion banks in the LBMA and COMEX.
Basel III makes paper silver either unprofitable, or completely out of the question, meaning that a lot of unallocated silver holders are also now out in the cold.
This means that for those of them who want to maintain exposure to silver prices there are 2 options:
-
Buy physical -- stressing the limited supply even further.
-
Buy silver ETFs to track the price -- many of whom will have to buy physical due to no easy paper for them any longer either. 100% silver ETFs also either buy remaining physical, or stop issuing units.
TL;DR Basel III may lead to a lot of paper silver holders suddenly having no option but to invest in a very limited supply of physical silver if they want to remain in silver at all.
In my language Sacfërh Narastes there is a system of obviation, and I was wondering whether it was an odd choice to mark the proximate as I know that many languages mark the obviate. It just didn’t seem like it made logical sense to me, because the whole point of having this system is to background things, so why give it its own special morphology?
That’s how I thought anyway, someone more knowledgeable please tell me I’m wrong lmao
Was a response to THH.
TL;DR at bottom.
Apes are trying to crash the manipulated market by removing enough physical that it can't continue.
Meanwhile investors/speculators are out there treating Paper Silver as if it was Physical Silver in the belief that they can trade their paper for physical either at any time, or at a set time soon to arrive.
In the additional meanwhile, the Basel III freight train is barreling down the tracks -- next stop June 28 for the EU, which includes some number of bullion banks in the LBMA and COMEX.
Basel III makes paper silver either unprofitable, or completely out of the question, meaning that a lot of unallocated silver holders are also now out in the cold.
This means that for those of them who want to maintain exposure to silver prices there are 2 options:
-
Buy physical -- stressing the limited supply even further.
-
Buy silver ETFs to track the price -- many of whom will have to buy physical due to no easy paper for them any longer either. 100% silver ETFs also either buy remaining physical, or stop issuing units.
TL;DR Basel III may lead to a lot of paper silver holders suddenly having no option but to invest in a very limited supply of physical silver if they want to remain in silver at all.
