I remember during operation neon dawn people were barely using her despite her still having a killer loadout, was it the gonne 6? Was the fact that people realized how strong her loadout could be? I can't sleep pls help :)
Iana was mentioned in the codex so I'm guessing that means she won't be added as an operator? it mentioned "Nineke Iana Meijer"
Nomad has her guns which sucks
Comic book writer accused of torture and murder characteristic of one of his graphic novels.
Spoilers ahead: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/blake-leibel-torture-iana-kasian-murder-girlfriend-west-hollywood-comic-book-writer-crime-drained-blood-scalped-a7967456.html
Now bear with me, I don't mean to fire a bullet. Just the sound and muzzle flash of the rifle firing?
Her footsteps make sound, why shouldn't her rifle? It would be a cool and interestimg buff after all rifle nerfs. Would push people to use the gadget more then her other utility.
Perhaps as balance take her nades away, as she has the gonne-6.
Thoughts?
The way ubisoft has gone about "balancing" explosive utility ops is terrible and hurting the game. Their obssession with having with gettting even pickrates is incredibly misguided and they seem to missing the point that explosives are integral to attack. Fundementally the only things you need for a successful attack are explosives and hardbreach regardless of how much bulletproof utility you remove from the game. Explosives are the most efficient and effective way to deal with nearly everything from shield, masetro cams, banshees, to kaid claws, mute jammers, mozzie pests, ela mines castle barricades, even players and soft walls, the only real exceptions are a mira and valk.
Their method of just nerfing the same 3 ops isnt going to change the fact that they are needed and will be brought in excess. If they want more diversity in operator lineups they need to create unique viable alternatives. Look at iana, they gave her a gonne to make her utility rival ash and zof but then they made ash and zofs guns nigh unusable so she became the primary choice. I really can't understand why they keep doing this when there are so bunch of ops that can so easily made viable alternatives.
Finka : we have already seen more of her since she got nades back despite pros complaining that her gadget can be detrimental, remove the recoil thing, the deafening, the wierd interactions with flashbangs smoke and pulse and she'd be a serious option compared to iana AND she could slightly counter gas and fire by giving planters extra health. You could even let her self res like doc to make her really fun.
Twitch : her recent changes already make her more reliable for removing utility but removes her ability to disable/destroy bubbles and banshees. IMO allowing her to remove one piece of bulletproof utility with a gonne would bring her closer to iana and wouldnt be too much since getting good value out of her drones takes a decent amount of skill and luck, maybe take her smokes if its too much.
IQ : remove mavericks nades and give them to IQ. imo mav really doesnt need nades, you play mav regardless because he skips so many steps and hard counters any kind of denial - in some cases he's a necessity depending on the bans/map. Him having nades makes it too easy to bring 3 sets. Ive seen a few people say IQ doesnt need nades but I really don't think shed be as strong as iana. You wouldnt bring an IQ every round since other ops bring more utility than her with nades + gonne/soft bre
... keep reading on reddit β‘
considering I pick both frags and the gonne-6
Was just curious, as Iβve much preferred the angled grip and higher fire rate on the g36, but I seem to be in the minority on that one. Only benefit I see from the arx is the sight, but thatβs really not that big of a deal, and many use the arx with a 1x sight anyways
I am a soloQ low ranked player and I wanna here your opinion. Which of these operators should I purchase: Iana, Zero or Finka?
