A list of puns related to "Gaw"
In four or five posts, Q posted that 4-6% of people are forever brainwashed and can never be "woken up." Q supporters repeat this a lot.
So that means that for every 100 "shills" they ban, 94-96 of them would have been converted and experienced the Great Awakening.
If 94-96% of normies were being converted after being exposed to The Truth on GAW, then that place should be WELCOMING newcomers. They should LOVE having people question the plan. Because almost all of them will accept Q. Only a small fraction won't.
According to Q, at least.
If Q supporters actually believed that, then why are they hiding? Why don't they engage here, or stop banning people? Do they not Trust the Plan?
Q people, I'm interested in your answer. If NCSWIC, then why on earth would you be worried about "shills"?
Simply put, they aren't that fun and they kill the server population.
I'm not sure if it's a hardware limitation (graphics or monitor) or how DCS handle low lighting, but it adds a level of frustration for me that I simple don't want to deal with.
The Navflir on the harrier makes it bearable, but I feel like I'm not the only one who doesn't like this game mode.
Maybe as a suggestion, tuning the darkness to like that of civil twilight, where there's a little more ambient light?
What are other people's thoughts?
Title
I am still shocked. They did it, those sons of bitches at ED did it.
Hello folks,
I started playing Iratus a week ago or so, completed it on More Pain! and now currently face Good Always Wins.
It might sound weird, but I think I saw a feature to reset the floor you currently are on and start new (losing progress on that specific floor), but I simply can not find it again - am I blind, or did they change that with a patch (noticed my new GAW save is on a higher version than MP)?
The problem being that if I mess up big time on a floor (the second floor 3-attack-per-turn duo broke me) I have to completely restart from the Mines, instead of just restarting the floor - which might be really painful if you are on higher floors.
Kind regards
May 2021 Be Kind GAW!
https://imgur.com/MATMLkD
This month we're giving away two different amazing items!
https://imgur.com/MATMLkD
First up is this beautiful Sacred Spins Ra in SS. This is really wonderful. This was donated by Jรคred Rurรคl. Thank you so much!
Second up we have this wonderful Geometrica Haptic donated by MetalStyleUA on Etsy and ะกะตัะณะตะน ะะพะปััะบะธะน! Wow! Thank you so much!
This giveaway is being run simultaneously on The Daily Fidget on Facebook and /r/FidgetSpinners on Reddit. Every location you enter the GAW you get another chance to win!
Just comment with something nice to say about someone in the community or tell us your favorite spinner.
Names will be drawn from a hat on The Weekly Spin this weekend! If you are new to the community and don't know anyone yet just say hello! Welcome to the Spinfam!
Shipping covered CONUS ๐ - and that's it! Good luck everyone!
https://imgur.com/MATMLkD
Be Kind! ~ Aaron
Hi all.
So, I've been lurking here over the past day (and have periodically lurked on various Trumpian forums as a sort of morbid entertainment over these past few months). A lot of people here have talked about how easy it is to get banned from GAW or similar forums for "shilling" (i.e. asking difficult questions).
As someone with an academic background in anthropology (+ linguistics, which is also very relevant) I'm actually pretty interested in how this sort of "ideological enforcement" works and how people circumvent it. I've already read a lot about how it works in "mainstream society", when it comes to the enforcement of norms and viewpoints that you and I would both probably agree should be enforced: i.e. the basic rights of a human being that have to be agreed upon in order to have a functioning society.
Of course, when a certain ideology/belief system is in a vulnerable or threatened position, this "enforcement" works much differently than when the ideology/belief system is fairly stable and secure: I do believe that the "right to free speech" exists not simply out of principle but because there does come a point at which most dissidents do not pose a serious threat to the belief system, and there is a point at which it is genuinely just a wiser political move to accommodate dissent than to suppress it. When a belief system doesn't have that kind of stability, I basically believe that it almost certainly won't allow a right to free speech (regardless of what its adherents would want in principle) because it can't. It's not stable enough to withstand that kind of internal chaos. It will shift to a policy of "fit in or fuck off" at best, and violent suppression at worst.
So, moving on:
Let's say there's a Q person who is troubled by serious doubt but still depends on their attachment to Q communities. Having been more politically radical at a previous point in my life (although not in the same way as QAnons), I went through a few years where I had basically lost enthusiasm for my beliefs but wasn't willing to accept it or voice those feelings because I did genuinely get a lot out of the social connections I had formed that way (luckily my social circles weren't all that "culty": some of the friends I made this way also became disillusioned as I did, but some have the same convictions now as they did when I met them, and they haven't turned on me or ostracized me or tried to aggressively "pill" me back in to it).
Are there accepte
... keep reading on reddit โกJust hoping to fly it there.
Thanks!
#daniellasliv mon vi hรธre hvem vinderen bliver?
Reasoning:
Financial discussions on reddit are, understandably, dominated by US-based companies. I learned early on in investing, however, that having a diversity not only different sectors but also the currencies a portfolio is in can be beneficial. (Changes in exchange rates saw a portfolio that was invested in US stocks drop in value by as much as high single digit percentages.)
For this reason, I want to draw attention to three hopefully interesting UK-based companies in an effort to help encourage people to find diversity, wherever they are based.
All three are established companies that have the potential for fast growth, with two paying dividends. The third has yet to IPO but I feel might draw interest when it does, hence its inclusion. GAW and CINE are also traded on the NYSE as a depository receipt hence the different tickers.
Disclaimer:
Until now, I've been somewhat new to the details of investing, and am still getting to grips with fundamental and technical jargon, but am doing my best to provide information accurately. I'll provide links to their relevant LSE pages, as well as financial reports, to do a lot of the heavy lifting for me. The numbers I provide are coming from my broker and might be slightly different. If I have anything misleading or wrong, please let me know.
Positions:
I have a handful of shares in Cineworld Group (CWD/CNNWF) and am considering investing in both Games Workshop Group (GAW/GMWKF) and Brewdog, when it eventually IPOs.
Games workshop annual reports and half-year results
Possibly the best-known company on this list, it is an established company that has well-recognized IP. They own "Warhammer" and "Warhammer 40,000" along with their spin-offs, the more recent "Age of Sigmar", as well as a "Lord of the Rings" range that is still in production. To add to those, they also own brands such as "Citadel" (not to be confused with the hedge-fund), "Black Library", and "Forge World". They have a diverse range of products, from their core table-top wargame minis, to literature, a large number of licensed computer games, and even a number of TV shows in development. The most pr
... keep reading on reddit โกI figure while I have a WTS post up and I'm staying awake later than normal, I'd add an easy giveaway to the mix.
The Prize - A JSB Hand Poured Gram Round
The Game - Tell me your favorite comedy movie - that hasn't been mentioned yet - and why its your favorite. The winner will basically be someone that finds me the funniest new movie to watch. There may be more than one winner if I feel like the suggestions are that good.
CLOSEDD
1st place: Giant Teddy Bear (V2)
2nd place: star frost corset
3rd: 5k diamonds
Rules:
Upvote
Follow me (optional)
Recommend me some games (but not Minecraft roblox etc)
Comment done (no need user)
Will end tmr 12-3pm GMT
Buddy and I spend hours slinging these bastards, literally hours. Each site is at least 10 - 11 crates the way we do it. 4 X Spaced Hawk components, ammo truck, Roland(3), Chaperal and Vulcan.
Often the above in lots of 2 to 4 about 1-2 kilometres apart for some overlap and better coverage. And here is the issue... The hostiles fly in and the Hawks frequently miss, lose track or eat chaff.
It would be great if at the very least 1 in 20 launched missiles score a hit. Really nice if 1 in 10 scored a hit. Alas they struggle and we end up with red air over flying our airfields. I have a track I downloaded from atwar and checked what was going on and in just one random encounter in the track I saw an Su25T have literally 32 missiles launched into it, with both module number 31 and 32 scoring the kill eventually.
Additionally the Kh25ARMs the Su25Ts launch take out the hawk sites far too quickly and easily with no counter (or none I'm aware of).
Not sure it's actually a hoggit issue could be more a game balance issue for ED, but I'm mentioning it here for a few reasons.
Any handy comments or advice appreciated.
Also.. please stop dropping hawk sites and other units all bunched up on the green smoke.
I've been playing around with flying helo missions on GAW lately. This morning I set up an arty battery (2 guns) in range of some red ground forces but they didn't seem to do anything. Is there something else needed, a JTAC maybe? Also, what's the best way for a helo driver to contribut? Hawk sites?
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.