They're not by the regular controllers though, they're right down the bottom. Still no double mod FSDs.
My idea was to get a very large flat ridged circle (probably very thick cardboard) and fix it to one of those ball barring rotating things used a lot on Chinese dinner tables to rotate the food around. It will serve as a single hemisphere of Earth.
Now here is the kicker, how do I send a ball from the "equator" on (an initial) path to the "pole"? It has to maintain its angular velocity with Earth (itβs not like I can throw it on). So tell me what you think of my idea. I would get some light plastic tubing and make a rig to hold a tennis ball. I would then need to branch out and try my hand at electrical engineering and rig up a 90Β° to 180Β° servo connected to an infrared on off switch. This would allow me to hold the ball in the tubing until I point my IR remote at the moving rig which triggers the servo to go from the 180Β° position to the 90Β° releasing my tennis ball down the tubing and on to the spinning board. I also wanted to soak the ball in paint (or water) so that it would leave a trail on the board (earth) which would be covered in paper.
Now this only explains north to south, south to north movement βdeflectionsβ. For east west βdeflectionsβ a simple ball on a stick would do right? Faster spin increases its radius slower spin decreases its radius. See what I am getting at here?
Let me know what you think! I am very much in the planning phase so give me some ideas!
I often fantasize about spaceships and flying, and for some time I've wanted to recreate one of these daydreams. Well, I finally did.
So here's a little Coriolis fan art animation piece for you!
https://vimeo.com/657626688
It is inspired by the ambiguous vision of the Zenithian Hegemony as a sophisticated and elegant but at the same time menacing presence on Kua.
The elite squadron known as The Black Swallows (SWE Svarta Svalorna) for some reason became "The Nighthawks" in the English translation of the game, but I much prefer the silhouette of swallows to that of hawks, hence the ship design.
Let me know what you think!
A big thanks to Andreas LundstrΓΆm for letting me use his awesome Coriolis music.
Currently, I have done the majority of my PvE combat with my Federal Gunship. With my PvE combat (and other ED endeavors), I have accumulated approximately 8.5 billion in credits (a.k.a. money/chedder). I was considering upgrade my PvE combat vehicle to a Federal Corvette (yes, I have the rank).
Having said this, because I know it will be a sizeable investment, I was hoping to find some of the more experienced combat commanders that perhaps had their Federal Corvette build on Coriolis. My theory is that I will be able to be more profitable in combat with the Federal Corvette, but perhaps my theory is wrong (right now, I mainly stick with low-res zones, and combat zones I don't do to well in....yes, it's because I'm kind of crappy). My goal is to accumulate approximately 12 to 14 billion in credits so I can make the extremely large investment of purchasing a Fleet Carrier.
As I have said, I have the rank to buy a Corvette, and I have unlocked most of the engineers, as well as unlocked all Guardian modules (if any of that information is helpful).
Thank you in advance for taking the time to read my posting, as well as for any links to Federal Corvette builds, and for any advice regarding this matter.
What works better, recoil direction or Stability, for controlling the burst with this fusions has anyone done any testing? Just trying to find a way to keep the bolts tighter together, and I don't see a significant difference, if any, behind a rally barricade (which increases the stability by a generous margin on most other weapons).
Emotional day. After all these years Iβve finally switched to EDSY from Coriolis. Anyone else made the jump? Or gone the other way? I still love Coriolis, but EDSY now suddenly seems like the real deal.
For clarity, I'm not talking about the Foundry VTT stuff. More things like the unofficial Symbaroum app that are great tools but not really designed for playing the game.
It is very often claimed by flat Earthers that the Earth does not rotate. This is a necessity, as a rotating flat Earth has immediate and problematic consequences for everyone living on it, and would do some very interesting things to the world's oceans.
It's interesting how many times I hear the claim that 'lots of experiments prove it is stationary' (to paraphrase a recent discussion), or the counterclaim that no evidence exists of the Earth's motion.
Well, let's review a strong source of evidence: military projectiles.
Militaries all over the world have to account for Earth's rotation when aiming ballistic weaponry at long ranges. I will break this down into evidence sections for organisation... this is only a fraction of the evidence out there, but I have to stop somewhere :)
Primary Military Sources
- US Marine Corps Field Manual dealing with manual cannon aiming. Tables H and I on p210 are titled;
>CORRECTIONS TO RANGE/AZIMUTH TO COMPENSATE FOR THE ROTATION OF THE EARTH.
There is also explicit discussion of it throughout the text, here on p399;
>compensate for the effects of ballistic wind direction and speed and for rotation of the earth throughout the firing unitβs area of responsibility. These corrections are combined with the position constants determined in the concurrent met by solving a subsequent met in each 800-mil sector or selected 800-mil sectors. (See Figure 11-32.)
- An article breaking down the same figures found in the US Army's Field Manual which correspond to the Marines. (here's an earlier version), relevant section on p12;
>Rotation of Earth.Although the rotation of the earth is a natural phenomenon, it is treated as a nonstandard condition for simplicity in the construction of firing tables. The magnitude and direction of projectile displace-ment from the target owing to rotational effects are functions of azimuth of fire, time of flight, projectile velocity, and relative position of piece and target with respect to the Equator. These effects have been combined in convenient tabular form in firing tables.
- To complete the triumvirate of military doctrine, [Naval Ordnance and Gunnery Vo
TRADED
In 1x10, when trying to navigate the tunnels >!to escape Eros!<, Naomi Nagata drops a bit of dust, watches the spiral it forms falling down, and concludes "we're going in the right direction". Can someone help me understand what one could glean from that dust's trajectory about one's position and/or orientation ?
-What are the enemies like? Are they just people? Or are there aliens/monsters/robots etc. -What are the adventure generally about?
The thought of this came out of a sudden for me when I was on the shooting range with my father and since there is not an exact answer I thought it might be appropriate to ask for it here.
Just to make things clear I am not a flat-earther and I am not looking for proof of that theory this just came as an interesting thing to think about and I could not find an exact answer to it.
Since in the Flat-Earth model, the Earth itself doesn't move at all but instead, the sun and moon move above its surface and the Coriolis effect is dependant on the Earth's rotation to work. Would it be at all possible for this effect to exist on disk planet?
Hi, Is there a know central space on the internet where people share their Coriolis content? I was thinking about images, video's, audio files, maps, other material for official and unofficial scenario's, etc.
Edit: I know Swedish and English, and have listened to Svartvikens rollspelspodd "Det fΓΆrlorade systemet", if it helps (:
Hey everyone if youβre looking for some new ttrpg content to watch check out Consequences of War DMβd by yours truly. It's a sci fi space opera with political intrigue, so if youβre at all interested in that type of stuff check it out!
