Pythagorean astronomical system Puns

My bad on the other thread. I accidentally deleted it trying to fix something. Go me!

Beginning with Episode 12, I could not help but see connections within Twin Peaks to the writings of Joannes Stobaeus' first two books, Eclogues. After the latest episode (14), the connections are almost identical.

For many years I've had a fascination with astronomical philosophy, and to the bore of my fiance and friends, have thoroughly enjoyed reading about the hypothesis and theories derived by this philosophy, no matter how clearly incorrect some is based on current empirical data. Needless to say I've found this season of Twin Peaks, particularly those episodes many on Facebook/Twitter complain about as "boring," as being extremely fascinating.

On the outset, excuse the length. I'm just touching the surface here but want to make sure the major details are as cogent as possible.

As many have stated before, indeed we're dealing with an alternate universe; however, this is not your typical alternate universe as ascribed across various philosophers and physicists, and often incorrectly described in some popular YouTube videos and the like. One cannot use Google to grasp the entirety or complexity of an alternate universe (which is a generic term in itself). It definitely does not require a genius to understand, but one does need to read more than a simple synopsis of what it is to fully understand where the connections lie.

The Pythagoream theorem - named after the Greek mathematician and philosopher Pythagoras - as a starting example, was used by the philosopher Philolaus to explain a complex astronomical system in which all planets revolve around a "Central Fire" as opposed to the sun (they are two separate solar events) with the Central Fire creating Earth's synodic rotation.

This theorem includes a "counterearth" which is said to reside on the other side of the Sun, though also having a synodic rotation around the Central Fire. Furthermore, this "counterearth" is similar in its general spherical geometry to our earth, it's hypothesized to be larger in overall mass in comparison to the earth, yet cannot be seen due to the size of the sun. This counterearth theorem is where the popular Nibiru - or Planet X - was derived from.

According to Stobaeus' interpretations of Philolaus's system, this counterearth is mythical and enigmatic, while also acting as a "mirror" of earth, yet opposite in its organic planetary makeup, which was described as ethereal and

Hello all For context I am a 5/10 M, Ksm and 1650 cr Druid and this is my first proper expansion playing (I joined at the end of bfa, got curve and that was it).

I am by no means a pvp expert but I’ve been playing alts and I’ve realised something:

The power creep associated with ilvl is enormous.

For instance when my mage dinged 60 he was about 130/140 ilvl and probably had about 10k hp.

Now I have done the covenant campaign and picked up a few pvp honour pieces and couple of heroic dungeon drops I’m now about 180ilvl and now I have 24k health.

Yup

My health has over doubled and I’m still only about halfway there from max ilvl.

Therefore I believe this pvp gearing system is acc really good as pretty much all three of the end game systems fit together.

I raid with my guild each week I usually do a couple of keys and then I’ll do some pvp with mates and I’m not punished for wanting to play everything.

Let me know what u think

Tldr :/ pvp gearing would be good if there wasn’t such a jump in power and health because of ilvl

Below are some of the interesting comments Ilya Sutskever made in the documentary IHuman.

I feel that technology is a force of nature. I feel like there is a lot of similarity between technology and biological evolution. Playing God. Scientists have been accused of playing God for a while, but there is a real sense in which we are creating something very different from anything we've created so far. I was interested in the concept of AI from a relatively early age. At some point, I got especially interested in machine learning. What is experience? What is learning? What is thinking? How does the brain work? These questions are philosophical, but it looks like we can come up with algorithms that both do useful things and help us answer these questions. Like it's almost like applied philosophy. Artificial General Intelligence, AGI. A computer system that can do any job or any task that a human does, but only better. Yeah, I mean, we definitely will be able to create completely autonomous beings with their own goals. And it will be very important, especially as these beings become much smarter than humans, it's going to be important to have these beings, that the goals of these beings be aligned with our goals. That's what we're trying to do at OpenAI. Be at the forefront of research and steer the research, steer their initial conditions so to maximize the chance that the future will be good for humans. Now, AI is a great thing because AI will solve all the problems that we have today. It will solve employment, it will solve disease, it will solve poverty, but it will also create new problems. I think that... The problem of fake news is going to be a thousand, a million times worse. Cyberattacks will become much more extreme. You will have totally automated AI weapons. I think AI has the potential to create infinitely stable dictatorships. You're gonna see dramatically more intelligent systems in 10 or 15 years from now, and I think it's highly likely that those systems will have completely astronomical impact on society. Will humans actually benefit? And who will benefit, who will not?

Artificial General Intelligence, AGI. Imagine your smartest friend, with 1,000 friends, just as smart, and then run them at a 1,000 times faster than real time. So it means that in every day of our time, they will do three years of thinking. Can you imagine how much you could do if, for every day, you could do three years' worth of work? It wouldn't be an unfair comp

Let me say first off that I'm not a not a conspiracy nut, I don't think 440Hz is some weird mind control plot of whatever.

Over the past few years I've been getting into things like microtonal music, and Gamelan traditional music which employs things like justly intonated alternate tuning systems. (For example I think sub instruments divide an octave into 7 instead of 12). I was re-watching some videos where people played a few things in alternate tuning systems just to show how bad some of them were. BUT, I couldn't help but be slightly charmed by some of them, and started to wonder if I/we would still find them so abhorrent had we not been flooded with 12-tet our entire lives.

Hence, I would like to start listening to music composed in various tuning systems that sound 'bad', like Pythagorean tuning, and see if I eventually get acclimatized to their typically grating qualities.

Is there anyone out there making such music?

Link - http://maajournal.com/Issues/2017/Vol17-1/Sweatman%20and%20Tsikritsis%2017%281%29.pdf

.ams files are the extensions of text files that can be loaded into a daw and they change the tuning system of the electronic instruments. With this, electronic music can be created which is not in equal tempered tuning.

I searched a lot for the .ams files of other tuning systems on the web, but did not find anything. Is there a site where I can get those types of files?

I already know a few but I don't find them amusing. I want a total brainfouch!

Thanks!

Edit: Pst! This was a mistake.