So I was perusing the Wikipedia about all this and it mentioned how the state governments were split between representatives of the population and senators of geographical regions within the states; just like how the federal government's senate was representatives of the state governments and the House of Representatives was for the population. Until the Supreme Court ruled against that arrangement in state governments.
Now, a federal government makes sense on the national level but why did the state governments try to copy it when the pre-independence colonial legislatures were unicameral (I could be dead wrong)
So what was the reaction to Nebraska's government change, and was there serious discussions among other states to follow their model?
(it just makes sense to me for state governments)
Nebraska’s unicameral state legislature has passed a bill that would create a state bank charter for digital asset depository institutions. It’s now headed to Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts’ desk.
Bill 649 would create a charter that would give consumers and institutions places to custody their digital assets.
The banks will look very similar to Wyoming’s special purpose depository institutions, such as Avanti Financial and Kraken Financial. The bill also allows already existing state-chartered banks in Nebraska to open crypto banking divisions.
