This is an automatic summary, original reduced by 65%.
> Ramallah: Right-wing members of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, have submitted an amended draft law which would allow the Israeli occupation to expropriate privately-owned Palestinian land until a final peace agreement is reached between Israelis and Palestinians.
> "The authority of the seizure of privately owned Palestinian land must be renewed periodically by the Israeli parliament," reads the draft of the law.
> The draft law grants Palestinians compensation for their land and, should the owners of the land refuse such compensation, they would only be allowed to appeal the matter in Israeli courts.
> The occupied West Bank is home to 150 Israeli colonies officially established by the Israeli government, as well as about 100 outposts which colonists established on their own, and later applied to have legalised under Israeli law.
> Colony building on Palestinian land is illegal under international law, which strictly prohibits the establishment of colonies in occupied territories.
> Numerous UN resolutions have clearly stated that the Israeli colonies constitute a violation of international law.
Summary Source | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top five keywords: law^#1 Israeli^#2 land^#3 Palestinian^#4 draft^#5
Post found in /r/worldpolitics.
NOTICE: This thread is for discussing the submission topic. Please do not discuss the concept of the autotldr bot here.
Be sure to re mark regularly and constantly patrol your "land" because a more alpha human may come and challenge you fir ownership!
Is there a way to check the ownership records of a plot of land in Kolkata? I have the plot details.
Thanks in advance.
I think my dad watches too much fake news and propaganda against Israel. We are Palestinian, living in the US (I was born & raised here, in 1st generation American) . My dad is telling me that the Arabs living in Israel, that are Israeli citizens, are not allowed to own land or property, or build homes, and that the Arabs are treated like 2nd class citizens.
I told him that is absolutely fake news and he needs to stop listening to his fake propaganda.
So who is right? Are Arab-Israeli citizens allowed to own land and property and build homes in Israel?
Quoted from this OpIndia Article:
https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/discovery-word-meaning-origin-aryabhatt-kadamb/
Discovery
>This is how Oxford Dictionary defines ‘discovery’.
>
>Discovery (n): an act or the process of finding somebody/something, or learning about something that was not known about before.
>
>Except, the origin of the word are quite different.
>
>In common indoctrinated knowledge an Italian explorer Christopher Columbus discovered America, Dutch navigator Willem Janszoon discovered Australia and Portuguese Vasco Da Gama discovered India.
>
>Christopher Columbus wanted to discover India but landed in America because he underestimated the size of the earth nearly by 40% and reached Cuba instead. Hence the indigenous people are called Indians. Vasco Da Gama was in Africa for months clueless of passage to India. He discovered India only when an Indian man named Kanak accompanied and guided him to India. Kanak used a traditional navigational instrument called the Kamal or Rapalagai. It’s common knowledge that people in these places existed for thousands of years before the sailors from far-off land set their foot for the first time. Then why should it be called ‘Discovery’ even though the place, people, habitat was living, breathing and thriving before the arrival?
>
>Here is where things get interesting. But first, let us understand a bit about ‘Papal bull’. What is ‘Papal bull’?
>
>It is a formal proclamation issued by the Pope (usually written in antiquated characters and sealed with a leaden bulla). It is a type of decree or an order which is legally binding command or decision entered on the court record (as if issued by a court or judge).
>
>The heathens of the world would be unaware of the real meaning of the term “discovery” as it relates to a religious doctrine enunciated by the church in papal bulls.
>
>In the bull of 1452, Pope Nicholas directed King Alfonso to “capture, vanquish, and subdue the saracens, pagans, and other enemies of Christ,” to “put them into perpetual slavery,” and “to take all their possessions and property.” [Davenport: 20-26] Acting on this papal privilege, Portugal continued to traffic in African slaves and expanded its royal dominions by making “discoveries” along the western coast of Africa, claiming those lands as Portu
Do they differ by parish? Has anyone had a hard time with this kind of transfer? Especially when the land is subdivided.
Where we live, we are very successful in our work, but we still can't afford anything that's not thirty minutes outside of the city, and that's too far for our little family. My in-laws have a house in a very nice part of town, and have offered us a portion of the property to put a modular home down.
They are somewhat neurotic, but by no means terrible people. I have my apprehensions around things like privacy, but when it comes to cost effectiveness, it's the best option for us, as buying a home traditionally would be far too much money and nowhere near town. As well, my wife is temporarily partially disabled most likely for the next couple years (long story, medical neglect), and their presence would be a huge help in this regard.
I'm wondering if anyone has done anything like this, or knows someone who has. Are there any concerns we should be considering? What kind of things would not be so obvious? They can definitely be a little...intrusive, but it's never anything a conversation can't address. Thoughts?
The headlines say it is so 'communities' can force councils to sell 'vacant' public assets, but we all know that private developers will be big beneficiaries. So, I think we should all write to community orgs - farmers' reps, local business unions, etc. - far and wide, telling them of this in advance so they can prepare to launch their own bids. We can't let developers get the drop on us.
'Right to Regenerate' could force councils to sell unused land | Construction News
Quoted from this OpIndia Article:
https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/discovery-word-meaning-origin-aryabhatt-kadamb/
Discovery
>This is how Oxford Dictionary defines ‘discovery’.
>
>Discovery (n): an act or the process of finding somebody/something, or learning about something that was not known about before.
>
>Except, the origin of the word are quite different.
>
>In common indoctrinated knowledge an Italian explorer Christopher Columbus discovered America, Dutch navigator Willem Janszoon discovered Australia and Portuguese Vasco Da Gama discovered India.
>
>Christopher Columbus wanted to discover India but landed in America because he underestimated the size of the earth nearly by 40% and reached Cuba instead. Hence the indigenous people are called Indians. Vasco Da Gama was in Africa for months clueless of passage to India. He discovered India only when an Indian man named Kanak accompanied and guided him to India. Kanak used a traditional navigational instrument called the Kamal or Rapalagai. It’s common knowledge that people in these places existed for thousands of years before the sailors from far-off land set their foot for the first time. Then why should it be called ‘Discovery’ even though the place, people, habitat was living, breathing and thriving before the arrival?
>
>Here is where things get interesting. But first, let us understand a bit about ‘Papal bull’. What is ‘Papal bull’?
>
>It is a formal proclamation issued by the Pope (usually written in antiquated characters and sealed with a leaden bulla). It is a type of decree or an order which is legally binding command or decision entered on the court record (as if issued by a court or judge).
>
>The heathens of the world would be unaware of the real meaning of the term “discovery” as it relates to a religious doctrine enunciated by the church in papal bulls.
>
>In the bull of 1452, Pope Nicholas directed King Alfonso to “capture, vanquish, and subdue the saracens, pagans, and other enemies of Christ,” to “put them into perpetual slavery,” and “to take all their possessions and property.” [Davenport: 20-26] Acting on this papal privilege, Portugal continued to traffic in African slaves and expanded its royal dominions by making “discoveries” along the western coast of Africa, claiming those lands as Portu
