I get it. Griping about micro-aggressions and getting this shit off your back feels good, but today something far, far more serious is happening and this sub is largely SILENT about it, while the top post is about leg hair.
Ladies, we're going to have far, far bigger things to worry about than someone not liking our leg hair in the -very- near future.
Please--it is time to organize, to begin protests, to begin not complying by any means possible. Roe v Wade is -very- likely about to be overturned at worst, absolutely gutted at best.
Genuinely looking to see where the “Don’t Tread On Me” and “No step on anek” crowd is when it comes to repro rights? Same people that are against mask mandates and vaccine mandates, that are pro-2A and free speech, are seemingly exceedingly quiet when it comes to a woman’s right to choose? I’m willing to admit I’m wrong so please prove me wrong.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/21
Instead, they released an opinion on military technicians.
At this point I am hoping they release the opinion unexpectedly. How can this be an emergency when they take so long to issue an opinion? Sickening.
BOOM opinion issued! OSHA RULE STAYED.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html
Will Marvin scrap his plan Monday?
>Sotomayor suggests Supreme Court won't 'survive the stench' of overturning Roe v. Wade
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/sotomayor-suggests-supreme-court-won-t-survive-stench-overturning-roe-n1285166
It is obvious there is no legal reasoning for the overturning of the law. The only reason is religious not based in law.
"If people actually believe that it's all political, how will we survive? How will the court survive?
I came across this article today that discusses the small but growing legal view that fetuses should be considered persons and given constitutional rights, contrary to the longtime mainstream conservative position that the constitution "says nothing about abortion and implies nothing about abortion." Is fetal personhood a fringe legal perspective that will never cross over into mainstream pro-life activism, or will it become the next chapter in the movement? How strong are the legal arguments for constitutional rights, and how many, if any, current justices would be open to at least some elements of the idea?
