Thinking about buying the blackcliff pole. My crit rate is 50.9 and crit dmg 137. 2pc Archaic and Noblesse, should i buy?
Title. Should I stay with Crescent Pike or get the Black Cliff Pole in the shop? Im f2p.
Hello there I decided to play zhongli as a main dps and i am thinking about that the blackcliff pole is better on zhongli is worst? (Crescent pike looks disgusting)
My pike has +44 attack but only upto +7 safe. Im planning on purchasing an +7 kingbird pole axe. Im not sure which one will deal more damage. I'd like to know your opinions before I commit to a pole axe (expensive)
I’ve been struggling to find a cheap, lightweight material for building a tensahedron in Europe. Today I had the idea of using telescopic aluminum pike poles (such as this one: https://www.watski.se/Teleskopisk-batshake-11UD2). Anyone tried something similar?
—
Apologies for the typo of heavy to heavily
What are the pros and cons for each and which does your department use?
Why would anyone take a pole cleaver when the pike is both cheaper and has better abilities, I'm just confused with if I am missing something. Sorry to bother you. Thank!
Edit: my spelling is bad
Can all of these work in conjunction together?
I remember reading in The Western Way of War by Hanson stating that part of the reason why Arrows were ineffective against the Greek Phalanx and later Macedonian Pikemen was that in addition to the shield Wall and Bronze Armor, the long spears hoplites and Macedonian phalangites typically held vertically before the clash protected him from arrows or at least dulled it before it actually hits him.
I am curious how does long Pole-Arm Weapons protect its wielder from Arrows?
Also I am curious-The Scots used the Schiltron, a long formation in which they were wielded long pole arms (pikes) and part of the formation included men behind wielding their pikes vertically. In this case however I read the Schiltron was vulnerable to archery barrages and that it was arrows that broke through William Wallace's formation at Falkirk.
In this case why didn't the long pole arms held vertically protect Wallace's pikemen as opposed to the Greek Hoplites?
Does holding spears vertically provide protection against arrow barrages?
Hanson's claims is inconsistent.
The Yari Ashigaru and Yari Samurais and to a much leser extent Roman legionnaires were known to suffer casualties despite being in spear walls.
However Macedonians historical texts describes the same thing about the long Sarissas protecting the Macedonian Phalanx from arrows and the Swiss Pikeman despite lacking shields in their formations also suffered minimal casualties from arrows in their squares.
I am curious why this inconsistencies in account?
I'm going on a fishing trip in Ontario soon and mainly fishing for walleye but wouldn't mind catching some northern pike too. Can I get a pole and use the same set up for both? Are they going to be too different of fish to catch with the same pole? Edit: Damn guys, thanks for all the help. I more than appreciate it.
I recently got a mod where I can make gravestones out of dead bodies and they'll be placed where they die. How ever I was looking for something a little more... Menacing Gravestones: http://skyrim.nexusmods.com/mods/23974
I remember reading in The Western Way of War by Hanson stating that part of the reason why Arrows were ineffective against the Greek Phalanx and later Macedonian Pikemen was that in addition to the shield Wall and Bronze Armor, the long spears hoplites and Macedonian phalangites typically held vertically before the clash protected him from arrows or at least dulled it before it actually hits him.
I am curious how does long Pole-Arm Weapons protect its wielder from Arrows?
Also I am curious-The Scots used the Schiltron, a long formation in which they were wielded long pole arms (pikes) and part of the formation included men behind wielding their pikes vertically. In this case however I read the Schiltron was vulnerable to archery barrages and that it was arrows that broke through William Wallace's formation at Falkirk.
In this case why didn't the long pole arms held vertically protect Wallace's pikemen as opposed to the Greek Hoplites?
Does holding spears vertically provide protection against arrow barrages?
Hanson's claims is inconsistent.
The Yari Ashigaru and Yari Samurais and to a much leser extent Roman legionnaires were known to suffer casualties despite being in spear walls.
However Macedonians historical texts describes the same thing about the long Sarissas protecting the Macedonian Phalanx from arrows and the Swiss Pikeman despite lacking shields in their formations also suffered minimal casualties from arrows in their squares.
I am curious why this inconsistencies in account?
I remember reading in The Western Way of War by Hanson stating that part of the reason why Arrows were ineffective against the Greek Phalanx and later Macedonian Pikemen was that in addition to the shield Wall and Bronze Armor, the long spears hoplites and Macedonian phalangites typically held vertically before the clash protected him from arrows or at least dulled it before it actually hits him.
I am curious how does long Pole-Arm Weapons protect its wielder from Arrows?
Also I am curious-The Scots used the Schiltron, a long formation in which they were wielded long pole arms (pikes) and part of the formation included men behind wielding their pikes vertically. In this case however I read the Schiltron was vulnerable to archery barrages and that it was arrows that broke through William Wallace's formation at Falkirk.
In this case why didn't the long pole arms held vertically protect Wallace's pikemen as opposed to the Greek Hoplites?
Does holding spears vertically provide protection against arrow barrages?
Hanson's claims is inconsistent.
The Yari Ashigaru and Yari Samurais and to a much leser extent Roman legionnaires were known to suffer casualties despite being in spear walls.
However Macedonians historical texts describes the same thing about the long Sarissas protecting the Macedonian Phalanx from arrows and the Swiss Pikeman despite lacking shields in their formations also suffered minimal casualties from arrows in their squares.
I am curious why this inconsistencies in account?
I remember reading in The Western Way of War by Hanson stating that part of the reason why Arrows were ineffective against the Greek Phalanx and later Macedonian Pikemen was that in addition to the shield Wall and Bronze Armor, the long spears hoplites and Macedonian phalangites typically held vertically before the clash protected him from arrows or at least dulled it before it actually hits him.
I am curious how does long Pole-Arm Weapons protect its wielder from Arrows?
Also I am curious-The Scots used the Schiltron, a long formation in which they were wielded long pole arms (pikes) and part of the formation included men behind wielding their pikes vertically. In this case however I read the Schiltron was vulnerable to archery barrages and that it was arrows that broke through William Wallace's formation at Falkirk.
In this case why didn't the long pole arms held vertically protect Wallace's pikemen as opposed to the Greek Hoplites?
Does holding spears vertically provide protection against arrow barrages?
Hanson's claims is inconsistent.
