Hi. I was wondering if anyone knows the dimensions of the contour in the fully Jarvis Contour? Especially the depth: how much depth does it take out of the table at its deepest? Thanks.

https://preview.redd.it/3zhekzyuuvd31.jpg?width=222&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c68775f09c0a9639113fa879b977cb6ee5e9bbca

I've never had any formal education for CNC milling so I have just had to find my own way for the few years I've worked with a Fadal CNC mill. I would like to know some basic strategies of what modern machinists are doing when cutting a contour in aluminum. I want to describe something and then hopefully have a few people fill in the blanks with how they would go about it.

Lets say you have 1" thick 6061 aluminum that needs a contour cut that will be a full slot cut in most areas. What size endmill do you start with, RPM and feedrate and depth of cut for your roughing? How much stock do you leave before final dimension?

And then for final cut, what size endmill, speed and feed?

I usually buy the cheapest tooling I can find on amazon or ebay that never comes with any sfm recommendations. My machine does 7500 RPM but I dont like to go past 4500 just because it seems like it will help the lifespan of the machine and I am usually not in a big hurry to finish the CNC work. If I can get some answers to these questions, it would help alot. Thanks in advance.

This is both an invitation to discuss and a sort of review. I like the “Devil in the Details” format so I’ll use that as the base of my ramble with a few additions at the end.

Earlier this week I got the ABH cream contour kit and Fair and I’m so in love! I had previously been using concealer and a matte brown lipstick (sounds weird but it worked lol) to HAC, plus some powder products, but this palette is Now And Forever My Love. My skin is combo-everything as in sometimes it’s dry, sometimes it’s oily, sometimes it’s dehydrated AND dry or oily… yes I have a good skincare routine.

How and when do you apply your contouring and/or bronzing product(s)? I contour every.single.day. Usually my routine is this:

• Primer, foundation and under-eye concealer
• Cream contour and highlight
• Bake the areas where I get the most oily (chin, nose, forehead)
• Brows and eyeshadow
• Use the excess bake powder to “finish” the rest of my face
• Powder contour, bronzer and blush
• Liner and mascara
• Last, brush off any mascara flakes or eyeshadow fallout, finish with powder highlight and setting spray

If I’m feeling lazy I might skip the cream contour/highlight and use just powder but that’s pretty rare lol. It’s more common that I’ll skip bronzer, because I’m fair and don’t usually want or feel a need to warm up my look

Do you use separate contouring and bronzing products, incorporating both steps into your routine? How?

I absolutely use a different product for bronzer vs contour. I actually love that the middle color in the ABH cream contour palette is a bit warm but not super orange, it’s perfect as a cream bronzer! My favorite powder contour is the SOB discontinued Sephora Tranquil, and my favorite bronzer is Physicians’ Formula butter bronzer in Light although I also like Whatup Beaches from Elizabeth Mott which is more cool, so better for colder months.

Do you use more than one type (pressed or loose powders, cream, gel, liquid, etc) to create different effects and looks? How do they fit within your routine?

Yes, as mentioned above I use both cream and powder. I have some liquid bronzers but I don’t use them that often. I might for the month or two that I’m slightly tan(er, ish) during and after vacation.

Which brushes and tools do you use to apply 'em? How do you wield them?

So many brushes lol… for cream contour in particular though, I’m still looking for the best brush to apply the product from the pan onto my face. I use a combinati

Welcome back dear readers. Who is pumped for this weeks episode? Oh I know I am. Oh how they tease us. Not one but two Gary exclamations and a possible "phenomenon". Don't know that could be but I am as pumped about this as a death row inmate is a pumped for his last walk. Enough of that, let's get to it.

An especially hopefully day begins at the cluster-fuck. Especially.  Wood sniffer,  Barkerlounger and Craig are pounding the dirt. Barkhouse in all his brilliance says we won't find anything unless we drill it. Thank you genius. Wood sniffer and Craig discuss how they like loose chambers.

Now we move onto the swamp. Billy and World renown metal detecting swami guru Gary Drayton are there with what's this??? Both Frenetti brothers?? The hell is going on here?? I'll need to keep a close eye on Peter. There is no way Lesser Frenetti has let him out of whatever dark hole he stashed him in last season. This is probably robot Peter. I'm still on to you evil Lesser and we will find out the truth, hang in there Peter! I got your back.  The boys are getting boggy with it according to Gary. Flashback to the man made swamp graphic that we've all seen 10417 times. Robot Peter finds a wooden trapezoid. Gary believes it's from a table Portuguese pirates used to do cocaine off of. Billy buckets finds another chunk of junk and thats it.

Back to the cluster-fuck and we are at target depth. Worthless Barlow and wood sniffer find maroon dirt. Fascinating. Then the pipe rips out a nasty fart. Craig, wood-sniffer and worthless Barlow sprint from the examination table to the drill rig and Craig smokes both of them, he moves pretty spry for an older guy. Hell, last season he looked like he was on his death bed. I think he just wanted to catch a sniff before it dissipated. Now, if they are looking for Zenas snatch, they are very close indeed. Just drilled the wrong hole. I did that once to Misses JJ, let me tell you, ill never make that mistake again, she was pretty shitty with me. Just move the drill rig a couple inches up.....They find a blade of grass which is just an excuse to use the flood tunnel graphic for the 14271st time. Now it's for sure a flood tunnel, not a void. These motherfuckers make greater leaps than a pissed off incredible hulk.

Back to the swamp and we have a Michael John sighting. You'll never guess what they find!!! If you guessed an ox shoe, you'd be wrong. Just more wood. This episode has more wood than a 14 year old who found his dad's porn co

Ceramic plates don't expire. That's just outdated misinformation that's further perpetrated by people with no understanding of the technical aspect on how plates work.

The expiration date on armor is the expiration of the warranty, a way to limit their own liability and to often get you as the consumer or end user to keep buying more. This concept is known as "planned obsolescence". So any manufacturer who writes that their armor has a shelf life simply wants you to buy it again after a few years. Otherwise, how do you keep making money off of a product that should last decades? Ceramic plates don't have a shelf life, or a lifespan in which it expires.

The ceramic itself does not degrade. The PE/ Aramid/ Fiberglass backing material does not ever degrade to an amount significant enough to cause penetrations. Adhesives in modern ceramics are like a heat and moisture resistant epoxy, it takes a lot more than you'd think to cause that to separate.

You can very simply verify serviceability at home by doing the tap and torque test. If it passes both, its good to go. If it passes only the torque test, its still good to go. If it fails both or fails the tap test, I would replace it, but these are generally incredibly worn or heavily used.

Tap and Torque test: (You can use a metal knife as the tap tool) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31dO_Xyj5ik

There's actually been studies done on the effectiveness of old damaged plates. One of which is named "The effect of cracks on the ballistic performance of contoured protective body armour plates". By Celia Watson et. al. for the 23rd International Symposium on Ballistics, April 2007.

In this test they studied the effects of age and or cracks on the performance of old British CBA plates (our equivalent of roughly a Level 3/ Level 3 ICW plate). They tested plates across 12 years of production, so since this was performed back in 2007, the oldest plate tested would have been made in 1995.

The portion we will be focusing on is the oldest batch, those we're "damaged reject plates", so those were 12 years old, with visible external damage, and xrayed to confirm internal micro fractures. They found that the plate still performed 12% above contract/ design specifications, even after being damaged and being 12 years old.

Next piece, since people are obsessed with videos is a video of a Vietnam era Ground Troops Variable Body Armor vest being shot. This is the earliest exa

I don't want to step on anybody's toes here, but the amount of non-dad jokes here in this subreddit really annoys me. First of all, dad jokes CAN be NSFW, it clearly says so in the sub rules. Secondly, it doesn't automatically make it a dad joke if it's from a conversation between you and your child. Most importantly, the jokes that your CHILDREN tell YOU are not dad jokes. The point of a dad joke is that it's so cheesy only a dad who's trying to be funny would make such a joke. That's it. They are stupid plays on words, lame puns and so on. There has to be a clever pun or wordplay for it to be considered a dad joke.

Again, to all the fellow dads, I apologise if I'm sounding too harsh. But I just needed to get it off my chest.

This post was originally written for r/IndianMakeupAddicts, but I thought it would be useful here. It applies to all depths of skin, really ☺

Conversation on my lip swatch inventory post about how different lip colours look wildly different on different people was the motivation behind this post 😂

Have you given up on finding a foundation that matches because every shade sits on your skin like paint, and nothing matches? Does every foundation you try turn out pink or orange? Do "nude" lipsticks always end up pink or red on you? Do you sometimes think your skin looks sickly? 😅 Have you ever wondered why your skin looks grey, green, ashy, sallow, or simply "dull" in certain lighting, or when you wear certain colours? If so, you may have olive undertones!

Human skin tones are complex colours, and these are the three main visual factors that determine your own unique, beautiful skin tone:

1. Depth and Lightness

This one is self-explanatory, and usually the main focus of shade matching. Practically speaking, however, a base makeup shade that is the right undertone can be made to look quite natural, even if it's a little too light or a little too dark. Bronzer, concealer, etc. can re-balance the depth and make it look natural. A wrong undertone product, however, is near impossible to finesse 😬

2. Undertone and Overtone

• Every skin tone has an undertone and an overtone/ surface tone. When we observe someone's skin, overtone is visible as the first colour we see, while undertone is only seen when you look a bit more carefully, and can be seen in the shadows and contours of the body - like shot silk sarees, that are iridescent, and have one major colour with a different minor colour that you see in the contours and shadows of every fold.

• This interior design article uses the term "mass tone" to refer to overtone:

>A mass tone is the first color you see when you look at a color.

• Haley Kim has a great video about undertones including olive.

• Sophie Marcs Beauty has a great video called How to Tell if You Have Olive Skin! LIFE CHANGING that I did, in fact, find life changing 😂 Thank you, u/Antique_

I see some people talking about getting a flasher for ice fishing and what kind to get. So I figured I’d give my opinion on what I use. I just got the DEEPER PRO+. I got it for $180.00 and I couldn’t be more happy. Unlike the traditional flashers it also gives me a sonar view on the same screen. It connects via your smart phone or tablet. The unit itself is smaller then a baseball, drops right in your hole with no lines or cables to get hung up in when your dealing in a fish. It automatically records your sonar feed for playback later. It also marks on the gps your hole locations once the unit is dropped in water. U can switch it to shore mode and plot the contour of the bottom of the lake. It can read depths up to 225 feet. I have a couple buddy’s that have flashers that cost them 4x as much then what I paid for mine and all it can do is flash. Check it out, I think u will be very happy if u can’t afford top of the line equipment.

Do your worst!

I don’t have a cooling system for the end mill. The only settings that worked halfway decent (while sounding horribly) were these: Adaptive clearing: Spindle: 16k rpm Feederate: 1200mm/min Optimal load: 0.3mm Max depth: 3mm

Contour: Hopeless 😅🥲

Thank you for any helpful advice in advance!

I've been watching Kackie Reviews Beauty for a long time now, and I've always appreciated her eye for colour. She was a fine art major, I believe.

And the recent Hannah Louise Poston video must have got me thinking, because in this recent video of hers, where she tried a blush that's warmer and more saturated than her usuals had her looking... kinda green 🧐 Khaki Kackie? 😂

Have I not been noticing because her makeup is usually meticulously chosen, and always harmonious???

Looking back, to her bare face at the state of this video, I did notice the green, especially in her neck. And that's how it is with Hannah Louise as well. I'm realising that face tones and neck tones show up quite different, not just in terms of depth but in that the shadow makes undertone show up 🤔 I'm also a medium olive with brown skin, and not as familiar with fair olive skin (although r/Fairolives has been very interesting!).

So I'd love to hear your thoughts about it!

I think she's a neutral-cool medium-muted olive. A LOT of her colour cosmetics are cool olive friendly, I find (berries, purples, lilacs, cool tones, only browny warms and so on). She wears neutral complexion products and getting a tan changes the appearance of her skin quite a lot. I'm not sure if she fake tans at all.

Let me know, y'all! Am I training my eye, or is this confirmation bias 😂

Edit: the conclusions I've arrived at are:

a) the SAGE GREEN walls of Kackie's studio seem to be causing some colour reflect in her videos (noticed after close inspection - her hair has a green highlight where the overhead light hits it 😂). I'd love to see her lighting setup, it seems to be a combo of natural and studio lighting...

Also, any kind of cool (bluish) lighting seems to be to cause a greenish neck shadow on anyone with any yellow and pink to their skin 🤔 That's some undertone mathematics I'll need to consider at leisure 😂

b) I think she has a neutral-cool pink undertone with some yellow, as well. Like, a muted cool pink peach undertone 🤔 I never imagined what that would look like! It lines up with how blush is such an integral part of her approach, and has a "contouring" effect on her.

c) (perhaps a big "duh" to many of you) product reference seems to be the clincher her. As u/Responsible-Sun-9361 says, she uses brown-toned blushes (with pink in them) to contour sometimes.

I live in India, so there's very little

They were cooked in Greece.

I'm surprised it hasn't decade.

Don't you know a good pun is its own reword?

For context I'm a Refuse Driver (Garbage man) & today I was on food waste. After I'd tipped I was checking the wagon for any defects when I spotted a lone pea balanced on the lifts.

I said "hey look, an escaPEA"

No one near me but it didn't half make me laugh for a good hour or so!

Edit: I can't believe how much this has blown up. Thank you everyone I've had a blast reading through the replies 😂

It really does, I swear!

Because she wanted to see the task manager.

There are certain stories that set the imagination aflame, that spend their energies pulling us into the liminal space between what we understand about the world and what we dimly suppose might be. Oliver Sacks is adept at this task, drawing readers through a set of case studies and meditations that make the mind feel at once terrifyingly mechanical and fragile, brilliantly powerful and divine. I will not dive deep into the neurology underlying the anecdotes here, both because I am not qualified and because I believe the book functions best as a tool to excite curiosity and invite wonder. Here, I recount the notable stories mostly for my own benefit—as notes and a summary with little original thought—and share for the interested.

I am drawn to stories of this sort. I put one of them in my dating profile once, in fact: "Ask me about anosognosia." It was a silly conceit. Of the condition, I knew only what I had read in a New York Times article: a neurological rarity in which people are altogether unaware of their ailment. The example is given of those with left-sided paralysis who, when asked to pick a fork up, do so with their right hands, and-if prompted to do so with their left-become uncooperative and would muster excuse after excuse rather than acknowledge their own partial paralysis. "I'm tired." "I don't feel like it." The example stuck in my head and demanded to be shared, so I encouraged prospective dates to prod me onto the topic. This put me rather out of my league when a neurologist responded, but happily he forgave me my ignorance and let me fall in love with him anyway.

With such outsourcing on hand, I remain an eager but thoroughly ignorant amateur in the world of neurology, so I will share Dr. Sacks' stories credulously and without knowledge of more modern developments. His stories give the feeling that we are dimly feeling out the functioning of the mind, with new curiosities and peculiar wonders serving to illuminate a blurry picture.

The titular story in chapter 1 is an exemplar of this: a vignette of Dr. P, music teacher who lost most of his capacity for object recognition. Features remained, but would not cohere into wholes. Shapes, playing cards, and cartoons were fine. A flower became "a convoluted red form with a linear green attachment" until he sniffed and understood it as a rose. A glove became "a continuous surface unfolded on itself" with "five ou

I've tried both (there are only two, right?) VR golf sims on the Quest 2, and I was surprised to discover one of them is not only the best golf sim on the Quest 2, it's also the best golf sim of all time. (At the time of this writing.) And that game is... 🏌️‍♂️GOLF+🏌️‍♀️

Note, there's a whole mini golf and Top Golf thing in here too, which just doesn't interest me. I'm sure other people can tell you all about it.

Hoooleeee cow is it good. It was $13 on sale, so I was ready to be mildly amused. This is worth so much more than $13. I know it's cliche but you're in the game. There's a golf course all around you, and you can use it! Everything is intuitive! And it's hard in the same way real golf is hard! Don't get me wrong, this game is not perfect and is actually missing some pretty important features that you'd normally find in a golf sim, but those drawbacks are overshadowed by how completely intuitive and clean everything is.

Regarding the outlandish claim that it's the GOAT of golf simulators, the VR thing is just such a huge factor. They brought golf to VR and they just did it so right. It would be really hard for me to go back to Perfect Golf, The Golf Club, Tiger Woods, or anything like that at this point.

I don't feel like going into a really in-depth review here, but I will take a moment to point out the highlights of the game, and compare it to the only Quest 2 competition I know of: Golf 5 eClub.

Golf+ Good:

• Top notch UI, controls, and club adjustments. At any point in time you can press the trigger to move your point of view to the ball. When you do this with the ball in mid-flight you end up floating in the sky which will really put a smile on your face. The camera angles in this game are just perfect.
• The swings punish your inconsistencies the way real golf does, for better or worse. If you want to be "Mario Golf" good at the game just put it on Novice. But if you dare to bump it up to Amateur you will be humbled. Practice does make perfect though; you can observe your flaws and get better.
• Putting around the green is so real. The putting action is intuitive, and crouching behind your ball to view the contours is pretty insane.
• Great monetization model. One course is included, and you can buy additional courses (there's only one more at the moment) for $8. Nothing else resembling a microtransaction that I can see.
• Excellent audio. The sound effects are perfect, even the sound it makes when you're choosing you

But that’s comparing apples to oranges

##Introduction Welcome to the third of six /r/anime Awards 2021 Jury Discusses threads! Today, the lovely fellows of the Cinematography jury are discussing Sonny Boy.

This post was collectively written by the Cinematography Jury of the 2021 /r/anime Awards, organized, edited, and put together by /u/MisterJaguar. The jury chose Sonny Boy for this discussion thread, but its nomination and final ranking are still undecided, and each juror’s individual perspective is also subject to change. Similar perspectives of individual jury members are grouped together for clarity. Sometimes, a juror may be grouped in multiple perspectives if their opinions contribute to multiple stances or are difficult to classify.

This year, we are shifting away from production roles and embracing the ambiguity. As long as the aesthetic of a scene as a whole is examined, and no specific aspect is looked at for far too long before moving to other aspects, I allow jurors to bring up visual elements that may overlap with other categories. However, this category mainly focuses on the elements listed in the questions below.

Jury Members: /u/AdiMG, /u/BEOrophin, /u/Aztecopi, /u/hauntmeagain, /u/irvom, /u/jackachu100, /u/mcadylons, /u/Schinco, /u/tombeet

##The following post contains MAJOR spoilers for the entirety of Sonny Boy. Proceed at your own risk.

##1). At its core, cinematography has often been described as “painting with light”. How well did Sonny Boy manipulate light and shadow to achieve its goals?

It’s lighting is flat and not its most prominent aspect, contributing to an overall aesthetic rather than taking centre-stage often

Sonny Boy often uses minimalist lighting. While it looks clear and functional, it doesn’t do much in terms of deepening its themes. It almost never really uses digital lighting effects. It just relies on back-lit compositions or shots without clear light sources. Even when there is a clear light source, the shadows on characters could change between shots and there is no attempt to make them realistic. It varies from episode to episode but the show generally prefers to arrange entire characters in uniform light. It’s a tool in the show's arsenal and de

Heard they've been doing some shady business.

Two muffins are in an oven, one muffin looks at the other and says "is it just me, or is it hot in here?"

Then the other muffin says "AHH, TALKING MUFFIN!!!"

I'm looking for some help/advice on how I can better cut wooden parts out on the CNC. The current setup I have now works, but is creating more dust than chips, and the bit is getting hot and chattering.

The material I've been cutting recently has been 1" thick cherry (so not dense wood, but not thin either). The machine I'm using is a ShopBot Alpha. My go-to bit has been a 1/4" compression bit from Armana (46170), as I use it for other operations. Currently, I've been doing 2D Contours (with tabs) to cut the part outlines, with multiple passes at 1/4" depth. The feed rate I'm using is 40in/min. The chips left in the slot don't vacuum up easily, they seem to be well compressed into the slots I've created.

I suspect the lack of chip clearance is probably the biggest issue. But they're so packed in there that the dust collection doesn't have enough suction to pick them up. I've been following the machine, prying them up with an awl and vacuuming so that the next layer doesn't grind them to dust.

1. Is a compression bit the wrong bit for the job here?
2. I thought about using Adaptive clearance to make a wider slot around the parts, but that seems like it will take forever.
3. I also thought about doing a 2D contour that leaves some radial stock, and then do one final pass to clean it up. That night improve surface finish, but the roughing cut will still have the same issue as before, and honestly the finishes haven't been terrible, but I'm worried about bit life too.
4. I also thought about using a 3/8" endmill I have (Armana 46172) to cut the contours to half the depth, and cut the lower half with the 1/4" bit. Can't use the 3/8" the whole way because some contours have inside corners that need the 1/4" bit, but does using a bigger bit for at least part of the operation help?
5. 40"/min is a slower feedrate than Armana recommends (1 x diameter in wood is around 110"/min per the data sheet), and I know faster feedrates reduce dust, but I'm hesitant to push the machine faster on this. Am I being overly cautious here?

Thanks in advance!

but then I remembered it was ground this morning.

Edit: Thank you guys for the awards, they're much nicer than the cardboard sleeve I've been using and reassures me that my jokes aren't stale

Edit 2: I have already been made aware that Men In Black 3 has told a version of this joke before. If the joke is not new to you, please enjoy any of the single origin puns in the comments

Ceramic plates don't expire. That's just outdated misinformation that's further perpetrated by people with no understanding of the technical aspect on how plates work.

The expiration date on armor is the expiration of the warranty, a way to limit their own liability and to often get you as the consumer or end user to keep buying more. This concept is known as "planned obsolescence". So any manufacturer who writes that their armor has a shelf life simply wants you to buy it again after a few years. Otherwise, how do you keep making money off of a product that should last decades? Ceramic plates don't have a shelf life, or a lifespan in which it expires.

The ceramic itself does not degrade. The PE/ Aramid/ Fiberglass backing material does not ever degrade to an amount significant enough to cause penetrations. Adhesives in modern ceramics are like a heat and moisture resistant epoxy, it takes a lot more than you'd think to cause that to separate.

You can very simply verify serviceability at home by doing the tap and torque test. If it passes both, its good to go. If it passes only the torque test, its still good to go. If it fails both or fails the tap test, I would replace it, but these are generally incredibly worn or heavily used.

Tap and Torque test: (You can use a metal knife as the tap tool) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31dO_Xyj5ik

There's actually been studies done on the effectiveness of old damaged plates. One of which is named "The effect of cracks on the ballistic performance of contoured protective body armour plates". By Celia Watson et. al. for the 23rd International Symposium on Ballistics, April 2007.

In this test they studied the effects of age and or cracks on the performance of old British CBA plates (our equivalent of roughly a Level 3/ Level 3 ICW plate). They tested plates across 12 years of production, so since this was performed back in 2007, the oldest plate tested would have been made in 1995.

The portion we will be focusing on is the oldest batch, those we're "damaged reject plates", so those were 12 years old, with visible external damage, and xrayed to confirm internal micro fractures. They found that the plate still performed 12% above contract/ design specifications, even after being damaged and being 12 years old.

Next piece, since people are obsessed with videos is a video of a Vietnam era Ground Troops Variable Body Armor vest being shot. This is the earliest exa