I'm trying to understand the cultural/domain differences here. They seem like very different approaches to presenting research.
Hello there,
I am a research assistant and very new to academia. My supervisor asked me to check some conferences with edited book/ conference proceedings series books as a possible way to go after we were rejected once in a journal.
I have been checking this for a while and I couldn't find any beneficial solution for this.
Do you have any idea what is the best way to do it?
Are there any sources that I can see the edited books for their proceedings?
I am looking forward to your answers!
Thanks in advance
Hi r/MachineLearning,
Happy NeurIPS week to you all. This time of year and around other large major conferences in our field have always been exciting times, waiting to see what new work or break-throughs our colleagues and community members might have released. I personally work in a more applied signal processing space so it's always a task to find papers that might provide insight or outline a new method for learning that I might be able to adapt in my own research.
However as I look at this absolutely massive list of accepted papers, even just filtering papers by the titles has become incredibly time consuming and daunting. So I wanted to pick your brains for insight into how you manage with this massive amount of work to grudge through.
Do you wait for the community to self-select these, do you go for the top papers in terms of the awards, do you just wait for the papers to become relevant enough that they'll pop up when you're doing background reading on the subject.
I guess one of my personal struggles is FOMO on something that is highly relevant, well done, but just slips past the hive-mind of the community
Dear Colleagues,
The SIGDOC 2021 Conference Proceedings were just published!
The proceedings include a range of different publications, including research papers, experience reports, industry insight papers, panel and poster abstracts. It also includes abstracts for all the fantastic work in the Student Research Competition.
The articles are free for access at the link above throughout the conference this week!
Best,
Luke Thominet, PhD
SIGDOC Communications Manager
via IFTTT
I published in a conference but the conference does not have any proceedings. How do I prove that the paper was accepted? Has anyone gone through something like this? Do you even bother putting that paper on a resume?
I'm doing a systematic review and one of the papers in my search was published in BMC Genetics but it has "Proceedings" right above the title. Under the author information (single author btw), it says:
>"from Genetic Analysis Workshop 13: Analysis of Longitudinal Family Data for Complex Diseases and Related Risk Factors New Orleans Marriott Hotel, New Orleans, LA, USA, November 11–14, 2002"
This is a conference paper, right?
Advanced publication of the Decision of the President of the EPO and the Notice of the EPO
Consent of the parties to the oral proceedings being by video conference will no longer be required, unlike during the original pilot.
Oral proceedings can still be held in person at the EPO if there are "special reasons" which don't include objections against the reliability of video conferencing technology or the non-availability of video conferencing equipment.
I think it's worth highlighting that anyone can take a look at the upcoming opposition oral proceedings and ask to be sent a link to join. This can be a good learning experience, particularly for trainee patent attorneys.
K Hirano, E Okada, T Tanaka, K Satouchi. Proceeding of the Japanese Conference on the Biochemistry of Lipids, Kamakura, 1999, pp 139–142
This may be really useful.
Mentioned in this book:https://books.google.lt/books?id=LAMNW7k8kyAC as a reference to a synthesis
Got accepted for something along the lines. Will have an ISBN and indexing in academia.edu/google scholar? On the research hierarchy in terms of pubs, what does this count for?
