For two years after Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Hillsboro mothers and children marched every morning, after Ohio school board devised new ways to thwart integration ..in 1956 the children were finally allowed to enter their classrooms
πŸ‘︎ 54
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/eaglemaxie
πŸ“…︎ Nov 19 2021
🚨︎ report
TIL about "The Doll Test", which found that given a choice between Black dolls and white dolls, most Black children preferred to play with white dolls and was later cited as a factor in the Brown v. Board of Education decision. smithsonianmag.com/scienc…
πŸ‘︎ 2k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Itakie
πŸ“…︎ May 17 2021
🚨︎ report
Imagine hearing the decision on Brown v Board of Education & not knowing white flight is right around the corner...
πŸ‘︎ 48
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/wildcardcameron
πŸ“…︎ Nov 01 2021
🚨︎ report
In 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that sexual harassment was a violation of civil rights. Why wasn't this case as influential at changing society as Brown v Board of Education?

Like I know, it took a while for legislation to follow Board v Education such as Civil Rights Act, Great Society, etc. But crucially, there were significant push by social activists and even politicians for societal change almost immediately after Brown for further civil rights and legislation. And even middle school textbooks point to Brown v Board as the crucial turning point for the Civil Rights Movement. But why not after the 1986 Supreme case? To my recollection, there were no significant state or federal legislation addressing sexual harassment until basically nowadays. American society after the 1986 case just seemed to shrug their shoulders and went off like usual. High profile cases like Anita Hill didn't inspire immediate societal push for change, so what's the difference between the two cases?

πŸ‘︎ 32
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Oct 09 2021
🚨︎ report
[EVENT] Brown v. Board of Education

##Brown v. Board of Education

 


May 17th, 1954


 

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States has made a monumental decision, to side with the plaintiffs in a case that over the years has worked its way up to the SCOTUS. In 1951, several black parents attempted to enroll their children in the nearest schools to their homes, which were segregated white schools. They were denied the ability to do so, and as a result they worked with the NAACP to take their case to the courts. While they were defeated in their district court, the US Supreme Court agreed to hear their case, combining it with many other similar cases around the country.

 

The Supreme Court handed down a unanimous 9-0, siding with Mr. Brown and the many other plaintiffs in their case. The opinion that all other justices agreed with was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren:

 

We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

Thus, the Supreme Court has declared that the principle of "separate but equal", found in many state laws in the South, are wholly unconstitutional.

 

Later the next year, in 1955, another SCOTUS case, which was to follow up Brown v. Board of Education, dubbed Brown II, sent orders to the district courts to begin desegregating schools. With the court cases finished with Oliver Brown and the rest of the plaintiffs, it remains to be seen what will happen with regards to desegregation. With white southerners viciously opposing it, along with their respective state governments, it seems as if desegregation has a long, long way to go from here.

πŸ‘︎ 7
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/camcorder44
πŸ“…︎ Oct 12 2021
🚨︎ report
In 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that sexual harassment was a violation of civil rights. Why wasn't this case as influential at changing society as Brown v Board of Education? reddit.com/r/AskHistorian…
πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/HistAnsweredBot
πŸ“…︎ Oct 10 2021
🚨︎ report
APSR study: Originalism (a theory of the interpretation of the US Constitution) arose out of resistance to Brown v. Board of Education by conservative politicians and activists. It did not originate in legal academic circles as a deracialized, principled understanding of the Constitution. cambridge.org/core/journa…
πŸ‘︎ 316
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/smurfyjenkins
πŸ“…︎ Mar 17 2021
🚨︎ report
Originalism (a theory of the interpretation of the US Constitution) arose out of resistance to Brown v. Board of Education by conservative politicians and activists. It did not originate in legal academic circles as a deracialized, principled understanding of the Constitution. cambridge.org/core/journa…
πŸ‘︎ 164
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/smurfyjenkins
πŸ“…︎ Mar 17 2021
🚨︎ report
TIL that Mississippi abolished all public schools as a response to Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim…
πŸ‘︎ 242
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/komerj2
πŸ“…︎ Feb 27 2021
🚨︎ report
Ibram Kendi likens CRT opposition to backlash against Brown v. Board of Education desegregation case thecollegefix.com/ibram-k…
πŸ‘︎ 25
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/ThePoliticalHat
πŸ“…︎ Jul 08 2021
🚨︎ report
Did Brown V Board of Education happen TNOTL?

If I’m not wrong, Wallace can forcefully segregate every school in the nation but this implies Brown V Board of Education didn’t happen so didn’t it or is this an oversight.
And as a further question, what were the Supreme Court decisions in this universe and what is the Supreme Court even like.

πŸ‘︎ 11
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/OutLiving
πŸ“…︎ Aug 23 2021
🚨︎ report
Trump Judicial Nominees Are Refusing to Endorse Brown v. Board of Education motherjones.com/politics/…
πŸ‘︎ 7k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/beach-bum
πŸ“…︎ Feb 14 2019
🚨︎ report
TIL that a high school in Morgan Freeman's hometown of Charleston, Mississippi held its first racially integrated prom in 2008, 54 years after the Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court ruling. Freeman offered to pay for the event if the school board agreed to desegregate. independent.co.uk/news/wo…
πŸ‘︎ 2k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/EpisodicDoleWhip
πŸ“…︎ Jul 29 2019
🚨︎ report
TIL that Harris-Stowe State College was not named after anyone named Harris Stowe, but was a merger of Harris Teachers College & Stowe Teachers College. Harris was established for white students and Stowe for black students. They merged following the Brown v Board of Education supreme court decision en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Har…
πŸ‘︎ 86
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Klopf012
πŸ“…︎ Dec 03 2020
🚨︎ report
In honor of MLK Day - a young boy participating in a β€œdoll test” experiment to study the effects of racial segregation on children, the experimental results played an important part in the 1954 Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education, New York, 1947
πŸ‘︎ 1k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/ibkeepr
πŸ“…︎ Jan 20 2020
🚨︎ report
Today I Learned ...1954 – Within months of the Brown v. Board of Education decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, SLI admitted 70 African-American students, becoming the first all-white public college in the Deep South to desegregate.
πŸ‘︎ 87
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/KevTravels
πŸ“…︎ Oct 15 2020
🚨︎ report
Trump’s Nominees Won’t Say if Brown v. Board of Education Was Decided Correctly slate.com/news-and-politi…
πŸ‘︎ 3k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/hamberderberdlar
πŸ“…︎ Apr 12 2019
🚨︎ report
Lloyd Gaines vanished without a trace 70 years ago...what happened to the plaintiff in the Supreme Court case which was the precursor to Brown v. Board of Education?

3 months before he vanished, 28 year old Lloyd Gaines won an important U.S. Supreme Court decision mandating that the State of Missouri admit him into its university law school or build a separate and equal law school for blacks. On a cool, rainy night in March 1939, Lloyd Gaines left his home and told the door attendant that he was on a quick errand to buy some stamps. The 28-year-old Gaines was never seen or heard from again.

As Gaines was known to be a loner, days would pass before anyone realized Gaines was missing. It would take another seven months before his disappearance became public. Newspapers across the country carried his photo. None of those efforts produced any solid leads. In the weeks and months that followed, rumors circulated that Gaines had fallen into the hands of segregationist murderers. Rumors also ranged from him being a schoolteacher in New York to sightings in Mexico City where he supposedly fled to after taking a bribe to drop his lawsuit.

Authorities never looked into Gaines' disappearance, and it's unclear whether his family ever went to police in St. Louis or Chicago to report him missing. Much of his family still resides in St. Louis to this day. They surmise that having migrated from the South where the Ku Klux Klan had a massive stronghold, the remnants of that fear remained during their move and they didn’t want to attract any undue attention. Accordingly, the family never had Lloyd declared legally dead.

Written by reporter Edward T. Clayton, an article published in May 1951 in Ebony magazine remains the most thorough investigation into Gaines' disappearance. Clayton traced Gaines' path from St. Louis to Kansas City and on to Chicago, where he hoped to find work in the late winter of 1939. The story told the β€œtale of a man who'd grown weary of his role as a civil-rights trailblazer. β€œ In Chicago, Clayton found Gaines' former neighbors from St. Louis, Nancy Page and her daughter Eddie Mae. For several weeks Gaines was a frequent dinner guest at their home. On March 19, 1939, he promised to repay the pair by taking them out to supper. Gaines never arrived for the scheduled meal.

Nancy Page told Clayton that Gaines appeared distressed and worried in the days leading up to his disappearance noting that it seemed like he was running away from something. Gaines also never reported for his first day of work at a local department store. Meanwhile, fraternity brothers at the Alpha Phi Alpha house where Gaines briefly st

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 352
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/trifletruffles
πŸ“…︎ Feb 18 2020
🚨︎ report
Shutdown post from 9/18/2020: The 14th Amendment, Brown v. Board of Education, Birth Tourism and Katherine Johnson.

EDIT: Clarification for all: We will be 100% back to normal operations on 10/1/2020. We will likely leave all of these shutdown posts up for the sake of continuing the conversations, even though they break Rule #1. Thank you.

Tonight's post is brought to you by the mod team. The 14th Amendment is one of the most important, as it affords equal protection under the law. It was supposed to help Black Americans after slavery. And as you will learn in the wiki, became the foundation for a lot of court decisions. Probably the most impactful one was Brown v. Board of Education, meant to end segregation in schools. I'm here to tell you as a teacher, we still have highly segregated schools, all across this country.

Section one is about birth citizenship. There has been an uptick in birth tourism to countries like Canada and the US. This well written article says it isn't illegal in the US, but the news shows the government is charging folks somehow.

Our person of color today is Katherine Johnson. I'm a science geek, so I love stuff like this. If you haven't seen the movie Hidden Figures which was based on her and a few other Black women at NASA, you might want to read the wiki on her or watch this very short video tribute NASA made to her after she passed away.

Have a good one everyone.

πŸ‘︎ 174
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/BikerJedi
πŸ“…︎ Sep 19 2020
🚨︎ report
So it was Thurgood Marshall being forced to read the Constitution in a school basement that got us Brown v Board of Education? Is that poetic or what? uscourts.gov/educational-…
πŸ‘︎ 20
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Maudeleanor
πŸ“…︎ Jan 20 2021
🚨︎ report
In her testimony, Barrett said that Brown v Board of Education is not just a super precedent, but "correct as a[n] original matter." How does she specifically (and originalists generally) justify this perspective?

The title really has the question. She mentions several lectures she's given, but I'm not able to find much right now due to the current events pollution in the search results. Every search for her comes up with her nomination and hearings, for instance.

This Tweet has a video clip where she says this: https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1316373104269160449

I also found this article co-authored by ACB that sort of answers the question, but is more about the mental gymnastics needed to justify super precedent with originalism, not Brown specifically: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl

πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/nloding
πŸ“…︎ Oct 14 2020
🚨︎ report
TIL On April 23, 1951 Barbara Rose Johns, at 16 years old, led a student strike to protest the inequality of segregated schools in Virginia. A civil suit filed by the NAACP on her behalf was the only student led suit to join the landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar…
πŸ‘︎ 60
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/JFlani
πŸ“…︎ Dec 21 2020
🚨︎ report
On Brown v. Board of Education, Trump judicial nominees won't commit to US law and values usatoday.com/story/opinio…
πŸ‘︎ 1k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Captainstinkytits
πŸ“…︎ May 18 2019
🚨︎ report
Senate confirms Trump judicial nominee who refused to say if 'Brown v. Board of Education' was correctly decided cnn.com/2019/05/16/politi…
πŸ‘︎ 1k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Original_Dogmeat
πŸ“…︎ May 16 2019
🚨︎ report
The education gap in the USA between rich and poor kids is now bigger than the gap between black and white kids in the 1950's/Brown v Board of Edu.

I just listened to this BBC Podcast today and this middle school education gap statistic blew me away (Quote begins at around the 5:00 mark). This is also an example of why so many people today are calling for a shift in social justice efforts away from race, gender, etc... to more of a focus on the impact of income disparities, regardless of skin color, etc... "Economic inequality is now producing a bigger difference in school achievement than American apartheid once did". Crazy!

πŸ‘︎ 45
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/warrenfgerald
πŸ“…︎ Oct 16 2019
🚨︎ report
TIL that after the Brown v. Board of Education ruling which ended US segregation, the governor of Arkansas surrounded an all white high school with National Guard troops. President Eisenhower responded by nationalizing the Arkansas National Guard en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lit…
πŸ‘︎ 5k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Joey5729
πŸ“…︎ Feb 05 2017
🚨︎ report
What if Brown v. Board of Education went differently?

Related to my last post, what if the US Supreme Court had decided to uphold the "separate but equal" doctrine in Brown v. Board of Education? How would the rest of the 20th century have unfolded? Would Jim Crow still be the law today?

πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TheRedBiker
πŸ“…︎ Feb 09 2021
🚨︎ report

Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.