I'm fairly new to Warhammer, so I very well could be misunderstanding the concepts/strategies of the game, but shouldn't a 1k Khorne army put up a fight against any other 1k army since they are both similar in points? I am a strategy gamer so I do understand that some factions will counter others and that there definitely are synergies with using certain units together, but I've played 7 games with my Khorne army and I get completely wiped out by round 3...
Now, I know my army isn't going to be the most ideal because I simply bought the 2 Start Collecting boxes for Khorne (great deal of $50 for both at my LGS) but I seem VASTLY inferior to my friends' armies. (They are new too). My list is such: Korghos Kuhl, Bloodsecrator, Skulltaker, Bloodwarriors, Bloodreavers, Bloodletters, Bloodcrushers, Garrek's Reavers, and a Khorgorath (980). I've played against Big Waaagh, Beastclaws, Sons of Behemat, and Stormcast.
I'm using my Bloodtithe Points, enhancements, focusing on getting points rather than just fighting, and have used different strategies in the different games, but the differences in power levels between the armies seems ridiculous. So please help me understand!! Are point values inaccurate, is Khorne weak, or am I not understanding AoS properly?
P.S. I'm absolutely obsessed with the game and am not at all upset with my Khorne army, they're awesome!
Happy new year everyone!
We are just coming from a 2021 market where literally everything pumped, from dog coins to squid to the worst imaginable shitcoin and jpeg, everything had their day. Many millionaires were made, almost all the top coins posted their ATHs in 2021.
Yet some coins were fundamentally delivering value, but never pumped as much as a dog coin did. Few protocols that generate constant revenue, week after week, but are not even in the top 100 because the bull market decided a dog coin is worth $50 bn market cap, but not a protocol that generates revenue of $100m a year.
Right now, as BTC is in the dumps, couple of coins are strongly moving upwards - FXS and CVX have both done almost 100% this week. CVX controls billions of dollars under its belt, and is turning into one of the crucial infrastructure plumbing for defi but is just at the edge of the top 100. FXS may be even behind, though the team never stopped building.
COMP, an OG lending protocol is now available almost at a 2020 price. SNX is another protocol that has been beaten to death endlessly simply because it didnt create any hype to pump its price, but prioritised building. SNX has an entire L2 chain Optimism surrounding it, with multiple projects like Lyra, Kwenta and Aelin brining futures, options and venture capitalism investing to layer 2, but it's not even in the top 100. Because pump and dump shitcoins could generate hype and push their prices up
Well, at one point all the hype runs out. You can only pump a coin based on "reflections" and burns so much... when the narrative dies, the shitcoin quickly falls out of favor and is forgotten.
Those projects that kept building silently throughout the past few years will get a chance to shine.
So pick your targets carefully, we may be seeing a fundamental shift in the market over the coming year, as the fed tighten interest rates and liquid cash is removed from the system, all the hype coins are very likely to disappear and projects that have cash flow and users more likely to take centre stage.
Even if there is a bear market, you can beat the index - you just have to choose wisely.
Hi everyone, What's the value of a bad torch with a weak roll? I need a sorc torch but I'm poor
Is it 0-33% 33-66% and 66-100%? When can I say that a peak is strong? How is it defined?
If we take a theoretical person who has a disproportionately strong biceps/brachialis and has high back pressure, but their hand and wrist are weak in comparison, will increasing their biceps strength improve their armwrestling at all? What about if we make the discrepancy very high? Are there ways of pulling which can still take advantage of more biceps strength? Would increasing biceps strength without improving in other areas improve performance on the table at all?
Of course someone in real life would be training all at the same time and but I just want to know more about the relative value of biceps strength if you cannot apply that power all the way through your hand.
Let's imagine I create a cryptocurrency called Aquarius.
I created a cryptocurrency with a minimum quantity of 100 million Aquarius coins. Each Aquarius coin is worth $1. The total value of Aquarius is $100 million.
For every 1 Aquarius coin (imma simply and say AC) bought 2 more are created automatically. And for every AC sold 2 more are destroyed. This process of destroying stops when the quantity reaches 100 million coins. The quantity never gets below 100 million coins but can go as high as possible. This makes sure the price for 1 AC never gets too expensive when people want to buy and it never gets too low when people want to sell.
My question is that would this idea work as intended or would people lose money? Because based on my calculation, people who keep their money would lose their coin's value to inflation.
NB: Let's assume it becomes as well used as bitcoin and its purpose is to be used as a substitute for fiat currency where the market decides the supply of the coin.
Yes it's a cheaper item than these but Imperial Mandate is also granting 15 AP just like Everfrost, and Moonstone is also granting 5 AH just like Liandry's/Duskblade/Night Harvester/..., then why Shurelya's has to have a weaker passive than Galeforce/Stridebreaker?
Increase it to 3% MS and the item is probably still weak, but at least a little bit less weak and might see some niche play on Janna/Nami.
Good morning folks. I need to know where I can apply and have a chance at being accepted.
I am at the Rutgers RWJ SMP and have a 4.0 first semester and a 4.0 at second semester mid term. I can expect to have either a 4.0 of very close to it for the 32 credit hour SMP.
My MCAT is 519. I am working part time as a scribe. My undergrad cGPA is . . . . . . 2.2. yep.
What can I do? Please help!
To fill ye in on the story: In 2021 on the planet of Kaled the human race has united with a single banner, United Kaledonia, 50 years in the faction is doing great, established a few colonies, made a few designs and is researching experimental missile technology. I have found a NPR that's very hostile to me, they took one of my colonies, Dendrum. I have no designs for military purpose. I need your help to make or suggest what to put in a - Frigate, Gunship, FAC, Destroyer, Battleship and Carrier Design, ofc fighters. i got all tech, but i never advanced far nuff to fight a npr, help me i dont want stinky ass aliens to rule humanity
There are 26 or so constants of the universe that appear to be arbitrary and have no apparent cause. They seem to be fine-tuned for life in our universe because several of them, if slightly differing in value, would not allow life as we know it. For example, the cosmological constant, which determines the expansion rate of the universe, must be nonzero and within the range of [-10^120, 10^120]. Outside of this range, the universe would have either expanded so quickly that stars and galaxies wouldn't have formed or the universe would have recollapsed early on. Theories like string theory do not help since they end up having several free parameters themselves.
The weak anthropic principle gets around this by supposing that there is a multiverse, and that each universe within the multiverse has a different set of values for the 26 constants. If the multiverse is large enough, life should be statistically probable. So this explains how a universe with our specific constant values can exist statistically, however, it doesn't explain why there should be any set of values for the constants that lead to life at all. Why isn't it the case that every possible set of values for the constants fail to produce life? The universe has a set of rules that it follows in how it interprets and applies the values of the constants, so if there is a set of values for the constants that lead to life, the rules themselves seem to be designed as such. If a computer program took 26 random numbers for an input, and there was a set of values that made the program spit out the text of the first Harry Potter book, that would indicate the code was designed to do that. So does the weak anthropic principle or any other similar theory explain why the rules for how the constants are interpreted and applied seem fine-turned in addition to the constants themselves?
People who truly, deeply care for others are the fiercest, strongest individuals I have ever met. Strength is fighting when you have everything to lose. Strength is rising up against something you know is wrong even if you have no real chance of winning. What makes us do something this outrageously brave is being able to feel truly and deeply. No one is as fierce or as courageous as someone protecting the ones they love. Think cornered cat mama, standing in between the threat and her young, spitting and hissing. Never wavering, even if the opponent is thrice her size. Over my dead body! That is strength right there. Nothing is as scary and unwavering as someone who has something to protect, and in order to protect something effectively you need to care for it first. Caring and feeling for others is not weakness. It is quite the opposite. Empathy is what makes a human human. Why do you think we have such ridiculously high capacity to feel empathy and love? These traits got stronger in our species during evolution because they were needed. They literally are our strength. Lets not forget about it.
TLDR; Is there a lookup table for the K_a values of acids and bases? I googled the K_a value of nitrous acid (HNO_2) and found all this:
4.6 x 10^-4 (from the coursework)
4.0 x 10^-4 (https://www.thoughtco.com/acids-and-bases-weak-acid-ka-values-603973)
4.6 x 10^-4 (https://www.sciencegeek.net/tables/ka.shtml)
4.6 x 10^-4 (https://opentextbc.ca/chemistry/back-matter/ionization-constants-of-weak-acids/)
What am I missing here?
If you wanna follow me on an infuriating journey, here's why I'm asking:
I'm doing an online grade 12 chemistry course, and am given an example question.
Going through the examples answers, I'm confused at this point:
I assume that there is a table of common K_a values of weak acids/bases, since they gave me the value of the equilibrium constant in the answer. This means I should know this (or be able to find it easily) in order to answer the question.
So naturally I google it and find... very many conflicting answers.
[https://depts.washington.edu/eooptic/links/acidstrength.html](https://preview.redd.it/nrre9hwvyen61.png?width=617
... keep reading on reddit ➡
