Bases that located close to warpgate being ignored 99% of time, it's rare to have fight on this bases (Miller), and that's missed opportunity, a lot of these bases are really cool.
I'll give an example: z=nand(x,y) can be z=1 - x * y if all numbers are either 0 or 1. is the plaintext way to compute it. You could also use z=1 - sqrt(x * y) which has a solution at all numbers equal .5. But they say they do the plusses and multiplies while encrypted and that it accumulates randomness and breaks if you dont do some kind of maintenance transform that removes more of the randomness than it gives info about the nand forest being computed. I'd like to see both a plaintext and encrypted sequence of the same calculations.
"Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices" https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1536414.1536440?download=false
So for those who don't follow spoilers we had Karn leaked not long ago and it is basically a one sided lock piece with [[Mycosynth Lattice]]. For those who have never played with [[Stony Silence]] before it shuts down things such as [[Darksteel Citadel]] from producing mana. So with karn it is an instant lockpiece once they both hit the battlefield, locking every opponent out of their mana and any abilities they may have. Also, there is synergy with the new Tezzeret, so I suspect anyone wanting to build around these two cards will be buying up lattices since it works too well with their deck.
This isnt so much of a "look whats spiking" thread, but more of a really powerful interaction that just came up literally minutes ago. I have the text of the new Karn below.
Karn, the Great Creator (4)
Artifact abilities of artifacts your opponents control can't be activated
+1 Until your next turn, up to one target noncreature artifact become an artifact with power and toughness equal to the amount of artifacts equal to their converted mana cost
-2 You may choose an artifact card you own from outside the game or in exile, reveal that card and add it to your hand
(5)
Hi, i'm starting to learn how to use this thing, i'm learning VHDL as well, i'm a beginner when it comes to all of this stuff, so please keep that in mind if what you're about to read doesn't make any sense.
So, i have to write a VHDL code that simulates every kind of flip-flop, and i have to display it, like this, i can manage to program the flip-flop logic, the mux, the decoder for the 7seg, but i DO NOT understand the CLK and the CLR stuff
- Flip-Flop JK
- Flip-Flop SR
- Flip-Flop T
- Flip-Flop D
As far as i understand, i have to use a clock, and i have NO idea how/what clocks to use, i've read the documentation and i don't understand much but i know i have these clocks available in my FPGA, i also believe i have to use some VHDL code they provide for me in the documentation, but i'm not sure what it does or even which code to use since it's a lot of information i don't really understand.
Even if i get the clock stuff right by miracle or trial and error, i still have no idea how to use this clock signal inside my VHD code, it has to have a frequency of 1 HZ.
Please don't send me to read the documentation :( i've read it, trust me, is just that i don't understand all of it, it's very complicated stuff, also, there's really not a lot of information about how to use this FPGA or the diamond lattice software online, there's like the official stuff but not online tutorials, no youtube videos that hold your hand :(
I would be very grateful if you could shed some light on this issue i'm having, i would love to figure things out by myself but i'm just not skilled enough for now, if you have any information that could help me even if it not solves my problem, i would be in debt.
Thanks for reading this long post!
edit: i just found this helpful piece of information about how to use the clock resources inside the Lattice Diamond software, but i still don't know how to achieve what i need so it was not as helpful as it could be.
Devs, just think about it - lattice was never finished, and hex system are just shadow of the past.
No working logistics, no side objectives except "stay here for few minutes". No ways to slow down the Zerg, no ways to make it spread out, no ways to effectively cut it off.
You should rethink these systems before messing with thigs that, atleast, worked before you touched them.
You only denying one of the selling points in PlanetSide 2 - ability to move freely over whole game map. You making your community angry and frustrated.
-
How similar is Nano's block lattice of SysCoin's Z-DAG?
-
Which one has actually done more transactions in a live test?
-
I'm guessing that they're both good for payments. But when it comes to scripting abilities, how far is SysCoin from Ethereum? Does that even matter, since SysCoin has a working bridge with Ethereum, and can use its capabilities?
Thanks to whoever will be answering. I'm also curious to hear any other opinion on Nano, SysCoin, and Nano vs SysCoin.
Located somewhere on the esplanade between 4:30 and 2:00, techno and deep/house is what I remember being played when I went. Really beautiful array of lights.
I'd really like to know who they are!
I'm looking to make a lattice, but it is for a main dish, not a desert. I've seen it done before but I don't know what's it's called or how to make it.
Kinda like this: https://cdn1.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/og_twitter_scmp_analysis/public/images/methode/2019/01/30/f093d3ec-2398-11e9-9177-bd3ae24bba4f_972x_153552.jpg?itok=K3Q2Xz7S&v=1548833758
Hi, so was reading some background on this before putting the Crimpd app into use and Tom R was suggesting as a rough guide 2 sessions a week of Endurance, 2 sessions a week of Power Endurance, 2 sessions a week of Strength/Power and 2-3 sessions a week of Conditioning and Mobility. Now my question is what comprises a "session?" Is the idea that one exercise from the app constitutes a session? Cheers
Not sure if lattice is the right thing and looking for options.
Our deck has openings that animals use to get up on it and then eat whatever plotted plants we have. I'd like to block those areas off. I was thinking about using chicken wire, but that looks like it may end up looking like a mess. Can I use lattice panels and cut them to fit? I'd just nail them to the posts after cutting.
Why is there a banding of molecular orbitals in compound? I understand there are multiple molecular orbital interfering but given how they are the same molecule with same atomic orbital shouldn't it be multiple molecular orbital at same energy level?Like all sigma bonds are on one level and anti sigma are one level sharply? Also, Is the conductive band in metal is at bonding molecular orbital or valence orbital is a antibonding orbital to explain the over lapping of the conductive band and valence band? And is the conductive band always empty? I mean if the molecular orbital of the conductive band has a lower energy level then than the valence band, then there should be electron sitting in there even when there is no electricity passing through right?
The 4-days of recorded interview with Mirza Beg (Karachi, Pakistan) has now been fully-uploaded to YouTube, on the Human Chemistry 101 channel, in the form of 47 videos (see: Beg playlist), totaling 21-hours (1,267-min) of total viewing time.
Mostly a True/False with an explanation
Panel Methods make control points a doublet or source flow, and satisfy a flow tangency condition. Kutta's condition is not satisfied, nor does it work well for pressure distribution on lifting surfaces. Hence it also can't simulation downwash /induced drags very well.
The 3D application of the application is a whole lot more complex.
What is usually the purpose of the results of a panel method?
Vortice Lattice method use (only?) vortices and Kutta's condition, don't account for thickness (represent an area element as a source of circulation/lift?), are generally less accurate for general pressure distribution,
I've known about graphene for a long time, as I'm sure many of you have, but I just recently thought about a similar layout with Ag or Cu. I looked it up and only found molecules consisting of multiple elements. Because they are the best conductive elements we know of (silver is #1, but copper is a close second), I'm just curious. Also, if they have the 2D lattice, do you think they could create nanotubes as well?
In this paper, a new type of supramolecular architecture, protein Pascal triangle has been constructed by using the inducing ligand strategy that we developed for protein assembly previously. Although mathematical studies on this famous geometry has a long history, no work on such Pascal triangle fabricated from native proteins appeared so far due to their structural complexity. In this work, by carefully tuning the specific interactions between the native protein building block WGA and the inducing ligand R‐SL, Pascal‐triangle 2D lattice with three types of triangular voids has been assembled. Moreover, 3D crystal structure was obtained based on the 2D Pascal triangles. The distinctive carbohydrate binding sites of WGA and intralayer & interlayer dimerization of RhB was the key to make such nanofabrication in solution possible. This strategy may be applied to prepare and explore various sophisticated assemblies based on native proteins.
https://ift.tt/2IyRgxD
