A list of puns related to "List of wrongful convictions in the United States"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/lying-prisoners-new-laws-crack-down-on-jailhouse-informants/ar-AAHinYX?ocid=spartanntp
How long will it take Wisconsin to get up to speed?
Edit; Wisconsin insists on taking steps to defend their wrongful convictions.
Bad faith, Brady violations, devious attempts to hide/destroy evidence, obstructing appeals attorneys, violating their own statutes; all in the name of "justice".
Every one of these guilty people should be resigning in shame.
Some argue that Manitowocβs insurance would have paid out a large settlement had the depositions commenced. I argue that is false and Manitowoc would have been on the hook for at minimum a few million. That being said, public / government entities cherish their βbond ratingβ. Yes, municipalities receive bond ratings from entities such as Moodyβs. The lower the βbond ratingβ the higher interest they pay on loans (just like a consumer).
It is fact that had Manitowoc had to pay directly to Avery their bond rating would have plummeted. The Countyβs constituents would not be happy with them.
Due to a wrongful conviction case and settlement reached, watch for Milwaukeeβs bond rating to plummet in the coming months.
βIt appears Milwaukee will need to borrow the money to pay Stinson, according to the resolution that states the city would use "up to $7,500,000 million dollars of Contingent Borrowing to fund settlement of the above-noted lawsuit."
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/milwaukee/2019/07/11/milwaukee-pay-7-5-million-wrongfully-convicted-man/1673834001/
I can't be the only one tired of alphabetical lists where you have to scroll past fucking Monaco and Uganda to find the largest English speaking economy in the world. Hell, let the UK and Canada share the top with us, I'm even fine with putting China up there. Just end this nonsense where I have to scroll past microstates, developing nations where 90% of the population doesn't have internet, and half the world to find my country.
I'll edit this section as more people add their magazines in the comments section. Also, if you know any podcasts that read Fantasy/ Sci-Fi short stories on the regular, please mention them to.
In each case, the convicted defendant had some initial success in the lower appellate courts. But within the last year, in both Adnan Syed & Brendan Dassey's cases, the highest courts that will ever rule on their respective cases shut down their appeals.
In Dassey's case, the federal 7th Circuit actually voted to hear his appeal en banc, which resulted in a 4-3 en banc opinion that overruled the initial 2-1 panel of 3 judges that had ruled in Dassey's favor.
I see 2 possibilities regarding how appellate judges handle the flood of public/media interest in cases championed by popular podcasts/documentaries. Neither is particularly beneficial to a convicted defendant:
Judges can't be seen as favoring a particular appellant just because that appellant has 5 million fans/supporters instead of the ordinary appellant who has only 5. Nor can they invite the perception that all that is needed by any of the millions of defendants is a journalist/filmmaker/documentarian willing to champion their cause. These days it doesn't seem to take much to be a journalist (on Twitter/Medium) or a filmmaker (on YouTube).
I thought I perceived some parallels between the forces seemingly at play here regarding criminal appeals on the one hand and, on the other, some of the Supreme Court's considerations that come up each time it revisits an intensely divisive topic. Most notably, I recalled that in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), one of the principal reasons that motivated the Court to uphold most of Roe v. Wade was that, if the Court were to overrule Roe simply because opposition to Roe had grown louder in demanding that Roe be overruled, then the Court would be seen as "surrendering to political pressure" and as beholden more to partisan whims than to durable jurisprudential principles.
Do you think a similar phenomenon is occurring here: the more numerous & the more vocal a particular appellant's supporters grow, the more
... keep reading on reddit β‘So I saw a post earlier elsewhere on Reddit and it got me thinking, what if a convicted criminal, serving a sentence (term I don't think matters, but let's assume it covers the entire term) in a state prison for a state crime is elected president?
Apparantly if they were a federal prisoner in a federal prison they could simply hand the VP the reigns, get the VP to pardon them, and then step into office, apparantly with state prisons, that's more complicated?
To complicate it further, let's say the state governer is not compliant with the electoral process and will not pardon the inmate to take office. As apparantly that's who has the power at a state level (?)
List of 53 people named βGay Bowserβ in the United States Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser Gay Bowser
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.