https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/22/business/under-armour-kevin-plank-ceo/index.html
I don't get it. The guy wants to reinvigorate an abandoned part of city and bring in jobs and millions of dollars in revenue. He is keeping it in Baltimore because he by his own virtue has a commitment to this city, he doesn't owe anyone anything, and if he wanted too, could just relocate somewhere else. Giving tax breaks to people who will bring in money is a GOOD idea, because it offers a return on investment. I have seen things with city council people saying money should be going to impoverished neighborhoods in city, however these areas are the ones that do not have any positive economic incentives or any likelihood of ROI.
EDIT: I have to add this in because people keep repeating some sentiments that are wrong. Businesses do have leverage in these types of dealings, especially in a place like Baltimore where it is in best interest.
"I joined the American Manufacturing Council because I believed it was important for Under Armour to have an active seat at the table and represent our industry. We remain resolute in our potential and ability to improve American manufacturing. However, Under Armour engages in innovation and sports, not politics.
I am appreciative of the opportunity to have served, but have decided to step down from the council. I love our country and our company and will continue to focus my efforts on inspiring every person that they can do anything through the power of sport which promotes unity, diversity and inclusion."
