#TL;DR (at the top this time)
With the specific wording used by The SEC in their recent FOIA response, they may as well have just confirmed that the raw vote count in June was greater than the number of shares outstanding and that the DOJ is actively investigating naked shorting on GameStop and pursuing criminal prosecution. Buckle up, Fucklehead.
#Predicting the SEC's FOIA Response...
Good morning, apes! Three weeks ago, I wrote this DD examining the verbiage of the initial response the SEC sent back to /u/automatedcharterer's FOIA request for the raw vote count from GameStop's annual shareholder meeting in June. In the DD, I proposed that several logical conclusions can be drawn from the similarities in wording of the SEC's response and the wording of their own written FOIA policy:
- Gamestop handed over the raw vote data to the SEC as part of their regulatory investigation, the SEC found evidence of criminal wrongdoing and handed the investigation over to the DOJ who currently maintains the record as a material piece of evidence in that investigation.
- Whomever they're investigating—probably Kenny—has not been informed of the existence of this evidence.
- The raw vote total would only be material evidence in a criminal case if it is greater than the total number of shares outstanding, which would prove that illegal naked shorting occurred on Gamestop.
- If we accept that the vote total in JUNE was greater than the number of shares outstanding, it also effectively confirms that we own the float and then some and that shorts hadn't closed their positions at that point.
I highly suggest reading the whole post to follow my train of logic and see for yourself just how closely what they wrote in the FOIA response letter matches their written policy.
Most importantly, I outlined the following criterion to judge whether the conclusions I had drawn in the post were accurate and predicted how they would need to respond to confirm them:
> If /u/automatedcharterer receives a response "indicating that the Office of FOIA Services was unable to locate or identify any responsive records", we know they used an exclusion which would basically prove this entire thesis.
#...And Getting it Right Almost Word-for-Word
Well, yesterday was the day I'm pretty sure only I and /u/automatedcharterer had been anxiously awaiting. [The SEC's final response o
... keep reading on reddit ➡
The Ontario election is coming up on Thursday June 2, 2022. Sounds like people aren't happy with Doug Ford's Covid response, but Ford is still the front-runner.
Obviously housing is likely to be a huge issue in the election. So what are the different parties planning to do if elected or re-elected?
A story from December: How Ontario should tackle the high cost of a home.
> The soaring cost of buying or renting a home in Ontario — and what to do about it — is likely to be a major theme in the 2022 provincial election campaign. > > Premier Doug Ford and his Progressive Conservatives have shown plenty of signs they're concerned about the potential political impact of rising house prices across the province. > > The premier has a housing summit with the mayors of Ontario's 29 largest cities scheduled for January, he's urging municipalities to speed up development approvals, and the PCs' polling firm has been surveying voters on what the government should do to make housing more affordable. > > The latest figures from the Canadian Real Estate Association show the average home in Ontario selling at a price 44 per cent higher than it did two years ago, and forecast to rise another 11.5 per cent in 2022. > > While the Ford government is focused almost entirely on boosting the supply of new housing as the way to rein in those skyrocketing prices, the opposition New Democratic, Liberal and Green parties are floating a range of other ideas as well.
After that, the Ontario municipal elections are scheduled for Monday October 24, 2022.
So far Up The Creek and Greenbrier are top of the list. The Boss said she is looking for more of the “woodsy” feel. Other places look great, but, respectfully, they look like parking lots - maybe that’s what an RV park is, though? I’m still new to the travel trailer game so please forgive my ignorance
And old ipod of mine got stolen years ago with a live track just titled "Jam" that I would LOVE to be able find again. It's a very similar, but much cleaner and better version, of the jam in the title starting around minute 6. Here's the spotify link.
In the version I'm talking about I believe it's preceded by a few minutes of discordant noise, then starts very quietly with a melody before getting into a fast-paced, exciting jam. Bob has some excellent bits in it (as they all do). Any help would be greatly appreciated! I'm fairly certain it's from the early-mid 70s.
*EDIT - u/IWillSingYouSongs you rock and deserve all the life karma you can get. It's this * beautiful * Mind Left Body jam from 12/2/73 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP6XSUGtKxg
Thank you!!
