We need to push our reps for fair redistricting, and have careful oversight in choice of borders this time.
The US Supreme Court has affirmed in Miller v. Johnson (1995) that racial gerrymandering is a violation of constitutional rights and upheld decisions against redistricting that is purposely devised based on race.
In Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek were decided on June 27, 2019, which, in the 5–4 decision, determined that judging partisan gerrymandering cases is outside of the remit of the federal court system due to the political questions involved. The majority opinion stated that extreme partisan gerrymandering is still unconstitutional, but it is up to Congress and state legislative bodies to find ways to restrict that, such as through the use of independent redistricting commissions.
So we have to find ways as a people to limit political parties just redistricting for their parties benefit, the feds have decided to let corruption be solved by the corrupt heads themselves, stupid, but if they won't fix the problem, we must.
Suggestions are welcome.
Having districts be +40 democrats/republicans makes candidates rush towards the extremes and try to get the most conservative/liberal viewpoints they can. It also insulates party members who have been in congress for decades because their district is so gerrymandered. I think this would be a step in the right direction in cooling political polarization and making candidates try to endorse legislation that is good for all people rather than the most conservative/liberal.
Newfoundland by population should only have 4 or 5 seats yet they have 7, PEI should only have 1 or 2 but yet have 4, Nova Scotia should only have 8 or 9 but yet have 11, New Brunswick should only have 6 or 7 but have 10, and Saskatchewan who should only have 10 or 11 but have 14. At the cost of Ontario, who should have 131 or 132 but only have 121, and Alberta who should have 39 or 40 but only have 34 and BC who should have 45 or 46 but only have but only have 42. Atlantic Canada has 12 seats more than they should, no wonder the Liberals pander to them and scoff at the west. They don't care about the West, the votes already won before we even start out West. Its time to fix this miss-representation in office.
Nearly all states use a Winner-Take-All system for the electoral college, where the candidate with the plurality of votes receives 100% of the electoral votes. The two exceptions are Maine and Nebraska, which allocate two electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote, and then one electoral vote per congressional district. This system, called the Congressional District Method, on the surface seems to be more representative of the will of the people within the state, since even the most polarized states still have sizable proportions of voters for the other party.
However, the use of congressional districts seems like an opportunity for swing states to gerrymander their electoral college vote. Based on recent Supreme Court cases, my understanding (not a lawyer) is that state legislatures have the power to decide on the methods for allocating their state's electoral votes. We are also at the start of a new redistricting cycle, where many state legislatures will have the power to draw congressional district boundaries how they see fit.
There are several recent examples of partisan tactics previously considered extreme. For example, North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin have shown an openness to employ openly partisan measures to maintain control, and they've been important swing states in past presidential election cycles.
So since the Supreme Court seems to have decided that partisan gerrymandering of Congressional Districts is effectively legal, my question is:
**Are there any legal barriers or state-level confines that prevent any of the 48 Winner-Take-All states from transitioning to the Congressio
... keep reading on reddit ➡https://elpais.com/espana/elecciones-madrid/2021-05-07/el-cinturon-rojo-de-ayuso-del-ansia-de-libertad-al-miedo-a-pablo-iglesias.html?utm_source=Facebook&ssm=FB_CM&fbclid=IwAR2DQhzALHBSkdnlnyZJw5TarUHyo4SKI-TxwEfE67BO71YpO3TjDZC8OzI#Echobox=1620370028
To the Chief Electoral Officer /u/AceSevenFive:
These are to require you to, on or before August 10th, 2021, make out a new writ for the election of a Member to serve in this present Parliament for the Electoral District of Newfoundland and Labrador, in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, in the room of Mr. /u/TheGrandClementine, who since his election for the said Electoral District has resigned.
GIVEN under my hand and seal this 11th day of July 2021,
/u/AceSevenFive
Speaker of the House of Commons
As dlc
Title says it all. This district would've been an easy pickup in 2018 and would've been within reach this year, but primary voters picked a progressive over a moderate both times.
To the Chief Electoral Officer /u/AceSevenFive:
These are to require you to, on or before August 14th, 2021, make out a new writ for the election of a Member to serve in this present Parliament for the Electoral District of Quebec City-Eastern and Northern Quebec, in the Province of Quebec, in the room of Mr. /u/LeFrancONT, who since his election for the said Electoral District has resigned.
GIVEN under my hand and seal this 15th day of July 2021,
/u/AceSevenFive
Speaker of the House of Commons
