Dilemma action Puns

This thought just suddenly came across in my smooth brain when reading the subs. Below is my attempt to consolidate what has been happening recently. Any comments is welcome.

This is what we know:

• We are approaching the anniversary of the sneeze, which means Long Term capital gains for many people who bought in Jan 2021.

• It is very highly possible that synthetic or phantom shares exist, especially given the volume traded during Jan 2021.

• Not 100% of the float is DRSed yet. Will some investors sell at the Long Term capital gains mark? Maybe yes.. That might be one of the reason why some investors chose not to DRS. I know the mantra here is diamond hands and DRS is the way, however the entire stock market is much more than us here (institution/HF etc) and they will do what they do..

• Now, if you are the MM (issuer of synthetic/phantom shares) and GME buyers from Jan 2021 sneeze started selling for profit after Long Term capital gains, the MM will need to pay out as the synthetic/phantom shares position is closed for a profit. This is where I think they asked for a cash injection: to survive the closing of these synthetic/phantom shares.

• Suppressing the price of GME will help MMs and result in a lower payout when those synthetic/phantom positions are closed. The downside is this allows retails and Apes to buy more shares and DRS to lock the shares faster. This, I believe is the prisoners dilemma that the MMs are facing and why the price action is so violently downwards after trading in 150-250 range the past 11 months.

I believe this is just another attempt by those criminals to survive one more day and kick the can down the road. If you believe in the company and nothing changes, there is no reason to be afraid. Instead, let’s DRS even harder and aim for the finish line.. To infinity and beyond!! 🚀🚀🚀

If you never heard about prisoners dilemma, you can find info about it here.

You are in Myrkgaard, solo. Around you are 20 other solo players, you all run as a pack. You soon reach a bunch of mobs. There are 4 scenarios

1. You attack the mobs, so does everyone else. Mobs die quick. Everyone is better off
2. You attack the mobs, nobody else does. You die
3. You ignore the mobs, everyone else attacks. You can chill and loot boxes in safety.
4. You ignore the mobs, so does everyone else. Everyone is worse off.

Without information of what the other 20 players will do, you are better off ignoring the mobs as this is not likely to lead to your death. However, since everyone thinks like this, everyone is worse off.

We recently moved into a new house and while the house is larger than our last I am left with no man-cave. Because of this I am left without a place to put my rather large collection of Spider-Man action figures, and as right now they're all just sitting in boxes in the basement. The dilemma has now become: do I continue to collect figures and store them away until I finish the basement and regain my dork-cave? Or do I simply stop collecting and sell off what I have?

Subject: Reloading IMMEDIATELY after firing should eject the spent round and allow you to load fresh ones without wasting good ammo.

I’m very much aware of Bullet-Grubber being used to save a good round. But that is if a good round is currently loaded. My argument is when a FIRED round is still loaded.

Normally, in-game, your character automatically pulls the bolt back after firing to eject the spent round.

But if you hold the fire button, he doesnt pull the bolt back until you release it.

So what if you press Reload while holding the Fire button, then it ejects the bad round without wasting good ones for the reload?

It wouldn’t be hard to implement and it would add more depth to the gunplay that most wouldn’t notice but some would deeply appreciate!

Hello all,

Hoping you can help guide me on this - I own a 68 plate Mercedes CLA 220d night edition with 12k miles and looking to downgrade to something reliable but more economical and thinking a VW golf.

Been offered £10k cash for trade in and part ex for a 2015 golf GT 2 litre with 60k miles - is it worth taking the jump or would you sell private and buy private if you were in my shoes?

Really struggling on what the best thing to do is..

Stop taking “moral dilemmas” to be “you can do a good or bad thing or nothing at all”.

That’s not meaningful choice. A meaningful choice is in the philosophical definition of a moral dilemma: > The crucial features of a moral dilemma are these: the agent is required to do each of two (or more) actions; the agent can do each of the actions; but the agent cannot do both (or all) of the actions.

Examples of Moral Dilemmas

• The Trolly Problem - Run over one person or five
• Socrates’s critique of the morality debts repaid - Repaying debts is ethical, but the timing of repaying a debt may be unethical. For example, you should not return a borrowed weapon to a friend who just started a drunken bar fight.
• Sartre’s student - A student’s brother dies at a battle in the war against an evil aggressor. The student feels it is their duty to avenge their brother by enlisting. However, they are the sole provider for their ailing mother. Their death would surely lead to hers. The conflict is a narrow scope of devotion to one’s family vs a wider scope in a duty to protect the common good against evil.
• No moral consumption under capitalism - You know a particular product can only be made or mined through slave labor. Do you buy it? What if... Pirates have stolen this cargo from the government/slave owners who perpetuate these horrors and are selling it to fund the rebellion to free the slaves. Do you buy it? In doing so, you normalize the ownership of said objects and as an adventuring hero may be a trendsetter that drives up the sale. Do you buy it? What if it’s a really cool item that gives +1 AC and can help protect the innocent villagers? Do you buy it?
• Withholding forgiveness - Someone wrongs you. You can choose to forgive or withhold forgiveness and cut contact. How about if you’re the only person who sells food to a village or another essential service? Do you have a right to deny them service? What if the wrong was stealing a copper? A silver? A gold? What if the wrong they committed was a serious crime? When do they deserve to starve or be driven out? Does your withholding forgiveness constitute as a wrong done against them?

I can go on and on, but I hope this contributes to planning real choices and not “Hey a sweet old grandma is dying in the middle of the road u help her or......?”

When the potions from Nimbin are no longer trustworthy and safe, the Firebreathing Kittens guild sends a team to investigate the problem. Dr. Crud III, Olive, and little Tangible venture north by train and cart to see what is amiss.

Trailer: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781482

Full Adventure: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781515

If you like audiobooks then you might also enjoy Firebreathing Kittens. Every three hour episode uses 5th edition Dungeons and Dragons to tell a complete plot with an ending. There's mystery, action, comedy, and friendship. You can listen in any order. It's free. You can listen to the adventures on Spotify, iTunes, iHeartRadio, YouTube, and more.

I believe the primary issue of effectively addressing homeless in the US is because it is a collective action dilemma. If a state/local government starts offering benefits to homeless to help the homeless it attracts more interested in relief. This makes the problem more expensive to for local governments address and measure the effectiveness of policies. I think it's likely that if we want to effectively address this problem it must be done through a federal level, with programs equally distributed across the states.

The problem is that the incentives are off. States with low levels of homelessness do not think homeless is an issue have no political will to pass legislation that addresses homeless on a federal level. While states with substantial homeless have the bad incentive of not wanting to pass programs as it will likely attract more homeless. Am I effectively diagnosing the problem? If so how do we address it?

TL;DR Questions:

1. Is it viable for me to switch to my right eye and hand to shoot the right-hand action? Anyone doing this? How badly will my ability to shoot accurately and precisely suffer?
2. Is there any efficient way for me to shoot the right-hand action using my left side?
3. For lefties who have switched to the right-side (described in question 1): How is it?

I'm left-handed and eyed, by default it would make sense to stick with a left-hand action

However, some issues I see with that:

1. I limit my rifle choices, chassis options (total headache right now)
2. I could be in a situation where I don't have my rifle and there are only right-hand actions available to shoot. Makes more sense to me to train on rifles that a readily available anywhere in the world
3. Probably more?

My goals as of right now:

1. Nail down fundamentals
2. Maybe compete to set baselines to reference from as I progress, but this wouldn't be often as of right now. Eventually, I would like to compete regularly in matches
3. Of course, build up to long-range shooting (1000yd)

Thanks

hey reddit! very glad i found this sub, so here it goes: my friends and i have been trying to find this lost relic from our childhood that our elementary school would put on for our class (it was a VHS tape, i remember). this was during the mid 2000’s probably, but im sure the series itself was probably from the late 90’s to early 2000’s. it featured a orange cat wearing sunglasses, and i think maybe a tee shirt as well, but i can’t be sure. we remember that the cat was named “cool cat”, but mind you, NOT the derek savage cool cat. this piece of media was completely different. now the show itself was based around what you as the viewer (presumably a child) should do when faced with a difficult social dilemma. should you A. get angry, B. get sad, or C. be cool. hence the name of the cat. this was put to the test by the on-screen live-action children when faced with a problem. i specifically remember one of these shorts having a boy fall of a lunch table and his peers laughing at him prompting him to act one of three different ways: “HOT”, “COLD”, and “COOL”. first it would show him acting “HOT”, getting angry at the other children for laughing at him. it would then explain why that wasn’t the right way to respond to the situation and then move on to if he were to act “COLD”. the boy would fall off his seat and when the others laughed, he would start to cry and get upset, thus the narrator would explain why crying wasn’t the right thing to do either. we then move on to what would happen if the boy were to act “COOL”. same thing, boy falls on the ground, peers laugh, but this time, the boy acts cool about it, rolling with it. he laughs about it and even goes as far as to pretend to fall out of his seat again. everyone laughs and everyone carries on happy. the narrator explains why acting “COOL” is the best alternative for a similar situation. there were several of these shorts as well. here’s the ones i specifically remember:

• two children get their backpacks mixed up • boy gets in an argument with his mom regarding a toy truck? • a girl in a gymnastics class

but that’s really all i can remember, or at least explain! my friends and i have tried our best to find it, but to no avail. i do also vaguely remember more animation with the cat at the very beginning, but my friends don’t seem to remember that part. but anyway, i hope that’s enough to jog someone else’s memory and maybe i can finally get some answers. i hope i explained it well enough.

So I basically have been professionally since I was 11 and I want to audition for the role of Katara. There is one slight problem though, I’m not of Inuit decent. Both of my parents are black and I’m light skinned and really mixed. Should I still try to audition? I don’t want to take away the chances of someone actually of that culture just because I could pass for it. I’m so confused but I guess I have some time to think on it. Thoughts?

When the potions from Nimbin are no longer trustworthy and safe, the Firebreathing Kittens guild sends a team to investigate the problem. Dr. Crud III, Olive, and little Tangible venture north by train and cart to see what is amiss.

Trailer: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781482

Full Adventure: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781515

If you like audiobooks then you might also enjoy Firebreathing Kittens. Every three hour episode uses 5th edition Dungeons and Dragons to tell a complete plot with an ending. There's mystery, action, comedy, and friendship. You can listen in any order. It's free. You can listen to the adventures on Spotify, iTunes, iHeartRadio, YouTube, and more.

When the potions from Nimbin are no longer trustworthy and safe, the Firebreathing Kittens guild sends a team to investigate the problem. Dr. Crud III, Olive, and little Tangible venture north by train and cart to see what is amiss.

Trailer: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781482

Full Adventure: https://player.whooshkaa.com/episode/781515

If you like audiobooks then you might also enjoy Firebreathing Kittens. Every three hour episode uses 5th edition Dungeons and Dragons to tell a complete plot with an ending. There's mystery, action, comedy, and friendship. You can listen in any order. It's free. You can listen to the adventures on Spotify, iTunes, iHeartRadio, YouTube, and more.