Bosonic string theory Puns

On the Wikipedia page for bosonic string theory, shouldn't the closed and open oriented theory have the vector boson, and not the one with only closed strings? I could be wrong, because the addition was made in 2015 without correction since then, but this seems to contradict information in the first chapter of Polchinski. Could anyone give clarification?

¶πn0 d√•`o ;n@+t s™t✓a®y the [OBJECT:MEDICINE] WAITS IT IS THERE FOR YOU IN THE LIGHT OF THE SEVEN comeintomyportalsaidthespidertothefly

i have studied a few physics, but didnt graduate in it and now i am studying mathematics, but it still remains a mystery to me how i can come from the Polyakov action to the result that Bosonic String Theory does require 26 dimensions to give the right solutions.

Would be awsome if somebody could guide me the way to understand to calculate that D=26.

Details in title! For calculations in Casimir’s effect, it’s necessary and valid. If it does work in physics as a valid solution, we need to come up with a way it works in math. Cause calculus says it’s divergent via ratio test, which means it’s impossible to find the value if it exists. However one of history’s famous mathematicians, Srinivasa Ramanujan, says it works and is valid. As he revolutionized calculus, we should listen to him.

If you want to learn more, use the sources here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_⋯ .

Compared to Ginzburg-Landau and BCS the Gross-Pitaevskii description of bosonic condensates is much simpler, why did it take years before someone published it after much more complicated theories for fermionic condensates existed for years?

I was always told that String Theory makes sense within itself; all the physics works out, but only in a closed bubble where energy is thought of as strings.

I thought that the Higg's Boson is a particle that arose from String Theory, so does the proof of its existence prove that String Theory is true outside of it's closed bubble?

Hope that made sense.

tldr: i think invisible string is about how, although it would be nice to believe that fate brought her and joe together, in reality it was a compulsory bearding arrangement forced upon her to make up for her gay past.

this is probably a huge stretch, and idk if there is currently a gaylor theory on invisible string, but here is my messy and maybe scattered thoughts on the song

invisible string has always been a little confusing to me in a gaylor context, as it seems to be clearly about joe. when i was reading the lyrics for invisible string, something stuck out to me:

>"and isn't it just so pretty to think . . . some invisible string was tying you to me?"

now i haven't read Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises, but i do understand that "isn't it pretty to think" is a very, very popular line from it. and given taylor's habit of making literature references, i find it hard to believe that this line isn't a hemingway reference

from my google search of the context of the line, it does not seem to have positive connotations (people who have read The Sun Also Rises please feel free to add input). these two screenshots seem to summarize a lot of what i was seeing:

https://preview.redd.it/xc8sxhg1cq881.png?width=1953&format=png&auto=webp&s=91f47834d69db182b69453f767b58d7dbfdaa0d8

https://preview.redd.it/2exdn0bc9p881.jpg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d176ddce8ad73d259728d83348bd2c06eabb4281

It seems to me that "isn't it pretty to think?" is a sort of dismissal of an idealistic view of something. this point is key to why i think this song is "joe skepticism" and sets the entire tone of the song

in the invisible string context, this line makes me think that taylor is directly saying that her story with joe is an imaginary ideal: "isn't it just so pretty to think all along there was some invisible string tying you to me?" sounds like "wouldn't it be nice if this was part of fate and we were meant to be together? isn't the idea of us being connected on an almost divine level a wonderful story?" but in reality, that isn't the case.

this theme of false fate is continued in other lyrics. the song seems to show that there is no reason that joe and her would have ended up together unless there was an external force: it would be nice ("pretty") to think that the external force was fate, but in reality, the external force was those around her forcing a bearding arrangement.

>"Gave me no compasses, gave me no signs
>

edit: sorry for the bad post. This is the link I was sent

I still have no real understanding of string theory, super-symmetry, or quantum physics, but maybe some of you could enlighten me.

What would happen if we took the strings from string theory and used them to string an instrument like a guitar?

Looking for direction on what textbooks provide the best overview of the subjects for an advanced home schooling option. Undergrad or grad level are both fine.

It's my understanding that string theory has been lauded as one possible way to incorporate gravity into our broader model of physics. Does the existence of a higgs field 'cooperate' with string theory? Is it entirely irrelevant?

Thanks.

I was wondering if there were any interesting observations and implications if string theory was in fact true.

I just wrote an article trying to take a 'more-or-less' scientific perspective on ""vibes"", ""energy"", and ""frequencies"" - I already knew about string theory, but I also came across the "resonance theory of consciousness"

Are these basically the same thing ? Doesn't string theory already cover the "resonance theory of consciousness" ?

I hear this often, that string theory is not a particular theory but rather a framework for doing calculations. I have a few questions about this.

1. What does it actually mean for it to be a framework? Are there analogies to other areas of physics? Like, is this an ok analogy? "The principle of least action (and principles like it in Hamiltonian mechanics) make up a framework since it allows us to do calculations (like finding the equations of motion given a Lagrangian/Hamiltonian) but doesn't tell us anything about the real world until we figure out the right Lagrangian/Hamiltonian to study."

2. What calculations are being done in this framework? For example, are they calculating scattering amplitudes of different processes or finding conserved quantities or something?

3. What can this framework do? Can it be used to make predictions? I hear that it is a sort of generalization of quantum field theory in that this string framework encompasses QFT. What does that mean? Can it reduce to QFT in the appropriate limit?

I apologize if these questions sort of miss the mark or the point. I'm trying to get a handle on what research is actually being done and how it relates to what I know other fields of research are doing.

Thanks!

What would happen if we took the strings from string theory and used them to string an instrument like a guitar?

I couldn't find it on Google.

What would happen if we took the strings from string theory and used them to string an instrument like a guitar?