The United States is three years into the spike in adoption of police body cameras and studies show some unexpected results.
Rather than focus on the use of the cameras themselves, I'm really curious about the specific policies related to their use, because they vary greatly from state to state, which should provide us with some data about what works and what doesn't, but I'm not able to find anything.
Some of the ways in which the policies vary are the time non-evidentiary video is kept; limits on recording victims, witnesses, or private situations; and whether an officer may view video before making report or statement.
One of the biggest issues is how and when the footage should be released. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, laws in some states treat body camera recordings as public records, but provide standards and many caveats for when police may withhold, redact or obscure certain videos. Laws in other states exclude body-worn camera footage from open record requests, but provide several exceptions that enable access to videos by specific persons or for specific situations.
The goal of these provisions is to be transparent in law enforcement without unnecessarily infringing on privacy, because many crime victims and witnesses who cooperate with police, as well as peaceful protestors, do not want to be filmed. This also affects the decision to make such recordings continuous or allow officers to turn the cameras on and off, which is another issue of hot debate.
So, is there evidence that any particular mix of policies incentivizes better outcomes, such as less police misconduct, better community relations with law enforcement, and more justified prosecutorial decisions? If not, are there studies in progress looking at these issues? The variety of policies in place seems like a nearly ideal situation to examine their effects.
A healthy Chinese doctor died of the virus and was a whistleblower.
Given the concentration of the people in Wuhan, the reach of the airborne virus, the secrecy and urgency of cremating dead bodies...
It is in my opinion, that over 10000 are dead and the crematorium are being used non-stop.
Given the yield of the quarantine of 50000000 plus people...
It makes sense that if over 100000 plus are infected, the urgency of the quarantine was relative to the alarming number of infections and subsequent deaths.
It does not make sense that only 400 plus are dead given the concentration of people in those areas.
And the Chinese government is hiding this debacle because they stand to lose economically market and be an embarrassment internationally for not handling this mutated virus in an efficient fashion.
More than likely stories of people who died due to the virus will be forced into silence.
I do not believe the official number of deaths.
I do not believe the official number of infections.
I question the secrecy of the government behind cremating people victims of the virus.
I question the quarantine of 50 million plus people if the virus is NOT AS BAD AS SARS.
I have lots of questions but the wet market that birthed this issue is a practice that should have been banned long ago.
I hope I am wrong, but the whole incident does not add up.
Edit: if you think these numbers are unrealistic, in the US, 19 million people have experienced flu illnesses this season, the CDC estimates. About 180,000 people have been hospitalized so far, and an estimated 10,000 have died. Sixty-eight children have died this flu season.
So 10000 have died.
Right now for me its Poison Ivy Myth. I've been putting up fence and gotten a bunch of it all over me, and I can't even count the number of people that think they can get it from me, or that I could spread a 3 day old rash around my body by sweating or scratching. Telling them they're wrong is futile so I just nod my head and smile.
In an earlier post I suggested that K9 Loof may have shown the path from the Radandt deer camp to Steven's burn pit, by which Teresa's cremains may have been planted. During K9 Loof's Track 6 (see https://imgur.com/a/yJ8Ezfk for full details), "K9 Loof worked down into the quarry going northeast, indicating on a body of water by going in two times."
The location of the K9 Loof's dips into the pond were recorded with "X" marks on the track map provided in the report and shown on the left in the figure below. The right side of the figure shows the current satellite map of the quarry field. If the bone planters took this path across the quarry field, perhaps they cleaned their buckets in the water or spilled part of the cremains in this location.
K9 Loof Track 6 on the left; Current Google Satellite View on the right
Is it possible that an excavation of this location might still find evidence of the bone planter's misdeeds that night? Any findings at this location, corroborated by the contemporaneous scent dog tracks, might be highly exculpatory for Steven, don't you think? To paraphrase Buting and Strang, "No one would plant cremains in their own backyard."
And what ever happened to the missing deer camp trailer?
(Edited for formatting) Here is a roundup of clues that point to the fact that Dolores implanted her own "Wyatt mind" in Charlotte Hale's body:
CINEMATOGRAPHIC CLUES:
- The Yin - yan symbolism portrayed by Dolores' and Charlotte's black and white clothing.
- Charlotte's reflection in the mirror placed directly next to Dolores' face in the same frame.
- Yet another mirror effect where Hale's reflection is superimposed over Dolores' image.
- A ten-second shot of Dolores' and Charlotte's juxtaposed profiles
CHARACTER CLUES:
- In the beginning of the episode, Charlotte Hale acts confused and unsure of herself, her aggression towards others is virtually non-existent. This is not unlike Dolores' character in the beginning of the first season, who is basically playing the role of a damsel in distress and is mostly a victim of her circumstances. It's only after Ford's tinkering with the rêveries that she develops aggressive behaviour and starts fending for herself (more on that in the dialogue clues).
- When Charlotte tucks her son into bed, her smile if fake, her eyes are dead her gestures are clumsy and her dialogue is strained, as if she's never done this in her entire life. On the other hand, the minute Charlotte perceives a threat towards her son, Wyatt's aggressiveness takes over and she is perfectly capable of killing the pedophile with her bare hands.
- Charlotte and Dolores' non-romantic vibe: At the beginning of the hotel room scene, I started wondering if Charlotte Hale's body was actually inhabited by Teddy's mind. However, this is disproved by the fact that there is little to no romantic or sexual tension between her and Dolores. Dolores touches Charlotte's cheek, tends to her wounds, undresses her, puts her to bed and spoons her; all of this feels more motherly to me than anything else. The spooning is even repeated in Charlotte's scene with her son, which reinforces that notion. Dolores is essentially nurturing her "clone" like a big sister or a mother.
DIALOGUE CLUES:
- The brand-new version of Charlotte wakes up, she's sitting in front of Dolores: "Where am I? Who am I?" [...] Dolores: "Calm yourself. [...] Remember who you are." It could very well
Like how wild would that make the US.
Is there any way to know when they're airing the Body of Evidence podcast?
