Blind Date (1987 film) Puns

I am including a portion of the article written in the early 2000’s with a link to finish the entire article.

15 Years Later, Murder-Suicide Fades From View (Fifth Monday)

By Gwin Moritz, Arkansas Business

After being caught embezzling from Stephens Inc., futures trader John Markle killed his family and himself in November 1987.  (Photo courtesy KATV-TV, Channel 7) A violent thunderstorm and a creepy old house, a famous mother who had literally portrayed the devil, a methodical killer wearing a Halloween mask: Despite dramatic elements that would tax a B-movie screenwriter, one of the strangest business-related crimes in recent history has very nearly faded from view. The case of Ronald Gene Simmons, who shocked the nation only six weeks later by slaughtering 14 members of his family and two former co-workers in Pope County, is detailed in two books and innumerable articles available on the Internet. Two books also were written about the murder of Little Rock socialite Alice McArthur five years earlier.

The murders of three West Memphis boys in 1993 inspired two critically acclaimed documentaries and celebrity support for the three youths convicted of the killings. But as the 15th anniversary of the deaths of John, Christina, Amy and Suzanne Markle nears, the only lingering attention comes from a handful of conspiracy theorists who insinuate — but never quite allege — that Bill Clinton or Jack and Witt Stephens may have been involved in the annihilation of the prosperous Little Rock family. (See story here.)

Weeks of investigation confirmed what seemed obvious as soon as the crime was discovered. John Markle left a short suicide note in which he acknowledged killing his wife and two young daughters. He dated and timed the note and called his attorney barely a quarter-hour before his body was found, answering the question of when. Three handguns containing 14 spent shells explained how.

It would take a few more days for the Little Rock Police Department to determine that the discovery of his risky embezzlement scheme had motivated Markle, a 45-year-old futures trader for Stephens Inc., to destroy his family and himself. It would be four years before all the subsequent litigation was resolved.

Fifteen years later, the Stephens organization declines to add any information to the public record on the Markle case, except to say that more sophisticated controls are now in place that would prevent a similar scam.

The CrimeAs far as the public was conce

It is incredibly fitting that Nekromantik should open with crude - almost childish - scribbles. It warns of forthcoming content that viewers may find offensive, and when the very first shot of the film is a close-up of a woman pulling down her pants to urinate on some grass, you are instantly inclined to take heed. Nekromantik doesn’t just double down on the crude content from there, nor does it triple down; At the very least Nekromantik sixty-nines down. The first feature film from German director Jörg Buttgereit, it remains the most infamous of his many disturbed cult classics.

Video Essay version with footage from the film: https://youtu.be/9cUkKLwxzDE

When reduced to a logline summary, Nekromantik is one of my favourites just for sounding so absurd and darkly amusing. The imdb description does a decent job so I’ll just repeat that: “A street sweeper who cleans up after grisly accidents brings home a full corpse for him and his wife to enjoy sexually, but is dismayed to see that his wife prefers the corpse over him.” That ridiculously grim premise and the sick punchline that punctuates that summary essentially gives you the gist of Nekromantik.

Needless to say, this is a purposefully shocking piece of European horror. Scroll through any forums, reviews and comment sections on this film and you’ll see it is the cinematic equivalent of Marmite; some really enjoy the taste of the taboo while others are left gagging under the table. Most discussion on this movie invariably returns to the sex scene. Can’t imagine why. I mean, is it not normal for your love scenes to begin with dragging a decomposing corpse to bed, sticking a pipe in its crotch, attaching a condom to the pipe, before initiating a lengthy and very gross threesome? Riding cowgirl on this boney boner is one thing, but I personally draw the line at him repeatedly sucking at and around the eyeball, which was a real pig’s eye taken from a slaughterhouse no less. You don’t see that every day. Thank fucking Christ you don’t see that every day.

Sequences of necrophilia and short bursts of gory violence aside, it should be noted that there is a prolonged shot of real animal suffering in here. A rabbit is grabbed and stuck with a knife, while the camera holds through the whole process, before the man proceeds to skin and prepare it. The footage is used in conjunction with others as an analogy, so has some reason for its inclusion, but I still feel I should give a

A guy walks into a bar and orders a beer. "I went on a blind date last night," he tells the bartender. "Well, how did it go?" the bartender asks. "Not so good," the guy says. "Turns out I'm more into curtains."

The butcher replied "a person who sells vegetables is grocer".

My old neighbor has been trying to set me up with one of her friend’s sons for several years. We are finally in contact and I think it sounds like we would be a good match. We have similar interests, hobbies, values, and are both looking for a relationship. We’ve agreed that we’d be happy to meet.

I am 6 feet tall and I am well aware that most men prefer shorter women. I can tell from him social media that he will not be taller than me. He’s probably a couple inches shorter. I feel like I should warn him before we meet, but at the same time that seems weird and presumptuous. What do you, the hive mind, think I should do?

Great start for my 100babies challenge...

https://preview.redd.it/p0o0azz70a981.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=8546c150ac44f043412122e9cebf981a99dc9ffb

the first James Bond film with Timothy Dalton. Dalton has said his approach was to go back to the original portrayal of the character by author Ian Fleming. Lots of people have said Dalton's Bond is Daniel Craig 20 years earlier and I can see it. Dalton plays Bond in a less suave, more human, more serious way. Some criticized him for that saying he lacked the charm, confidence, and humor of Connery and even Moore. I say there is still humor from his Bond but it is more deadpan. Living Daylights seems like an attempt a gritty Cold War spy thriller and it is certainly has a rather complex plot but it can be a bit convoluted for its own good. Still it seems to all add up in the end with a great climax. The theme song by A-ha is one of the best Bond themes and the final score John Barry contributed to the series is fantastic. Both should have been nominated for Oscars. Going back to the more serious tone, there is definitely more "grit" to this movie than a lot of the other Bond movies including a scene where an assassin brutally kills two MI6 agents. The blond assassin  is easily one of the more memorable Bond henchmen and is one that is more memorable than the actual main villains of the picture. However, there is still an element of camp still in this film including a scene where big breasted woman tries to distract someone while Bond completes a task and Bond and the main Bond girl slide down a cello case like it is a toboggan. It will be up to individual viewer if they manage to properly blend these elements. The Living Daylights I'd say is a fine Bond film that one should seek out if they have overlooked it. Don't be expect a full out action fest though, as said, this is going for a more genuine "Spy" movie  vibe. Also Caroline Bliss's Moneypenny is probably the cutest easily

Angel Heart is still one of my all time favorite psychological horror films, I honestly never get tired of rewatching this movie. It had such a great cast of actors, solid performances, very creepy & unsettling moments and it had such an eerie atmosphere & tone throughout the film. The film still gives me chills too, especially the ending. IMHO still the best performance I've ever seen from Mickey Rourke. He's had plenty of great performances over the years but I feel like this performance in this is still his best work. I think that his acting in this film's last few scenes were Oscar worthy tbh, he & Deniro really worked well off of one another IMHO.

I always felt that this was one of Deniro's best roles but I never heard people talk about his performance in this, which is a shame. I feel like sometimes the movie overall gets forgotten about. The twists in the film were great as were the reveals near the end. They definitely caught me offguard but what did you think of the film? Did it scare you or creep you out? What did you think of the ending? Did the twists catch you offguard? And what did you think of the performances in the film particularly from Rourke & Deniro?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Dancing

As a 90's baby, I literally just discovered Dirty Dancing and now I'm addicted to the soundtrack.

Hungry Eyes by Eric Carmen is especially a banger. It has that classic 80's new wave vibe.

Is it safe to say Dirty Dancing has (one of) the best soundtracks ever?

So I've been looking into the prior filmography of The OA cast, because it's obvious at this point that many of them either play or associate with various characters in similar roles to ones they've played in the past.

This line from the Wikipedia article immediately jumped out at me. Alice played the role of Tully Sorenson.

"Henry is tracked down by Tully Sorenson, a wealthy female book publisher, who has been impressed with his writing and is interested in publishing some of his work. She finds him through the detective she has hired. Knowing Henry is destitute, Tully pays him an "advance" of $500.

According to Fola's description of the game in Part 2, Level 2 is $500.

It is incredibly fitting that Nekromantik should open with crude - almost childish - scribbles. It warns of forthcoming content that viewers may find offensive, and when the very first shot of the film is a close-up of a woman pulling down her pants to urinate on some grass, you are instantly inclined to take heed. Nekromantik doesn’t just double down on the crude content from there, nor does it triple down; At the very least Nekromantik sixty-nines down. The first feature film from German director Jörg Buttgereit, it remains the most infamous of his many disturbed cult classics.

Video Essay version with footage: https://youtu.be/9cUkKLwxzDE

When reduced to a logline summary, Nekromantik is one of my favourites just for sounding so absurd and darkly amusing. The imdb description does a decent job so I’ll just repeat that: “A street sweeper who cleans up after grisly accidents brings home a full corpse for him and his wife to enjoy sexually, but is dismayed to see that his wife prefers the corpse over him.” That ridiculously grim premise and the sick punchline that punctuates that summary essentially gives you the gist of Nekromantik.

Needless to say, this is a purposefully shocking piece of European horror. Scroll through any forums, reviews and comment sections on this film and you’ll see it is the cinematic equivalent of Marmite; some really enjoy the taste of the taboo while others are left gagging under the table. Most discussion on this movie invariably returns to the sex scene. Can’t imagine why. I mean, is it not normal for your love scenes to begin with dragging a decomposing corpse to bed, sticking a pipe in its crotch, attaching a condom to the pipe, before initiating a lengthy and very gross threesome? Riding cowgirl on this boney boner is one thing, but I personally draw the line at him repeatedly sucking at and around the eyeball, which was a real pig’s eye taken from a slaughterhouse no less. You don’t see that every day. Thank fucking Christ you don’t see that every day.

Sequences of necrophilia and short bursts of gory violence aside, it should be noted that there is a prolonged shot of real animal suffering in here. A rabbit is grabbed and stuck with a knife, while the camera holds through the whole process, before the man proceeds to skin and prepare it. The footage is used in conjunction with others as an analogy, so has some reason for its inclusion, but I still feel I should give a heads up.

I