Bob found that hotel room and most definitely fucked the shit out of Alice
I just realised I’ve never given this a thought. Hoping someone here knows.
I was at the open house yesterday and some math students were yelling "Alice and Bob will haunt you in your sleep". Who is Alice and Bob?
If I don't have a wife I'll instantiate my kids idgaf
Okay so I wanted to know if my logic is correct for the approach of this practice problem that I'm doing in preparation for my final and see if I truly understand how the 3 pass protocol works so:
Alice wants to send a message to Bob using the 3-pass protocol. She decides to use the prime p = 17, and picks her key, a = 11. Bob picks his key, b = 13. (a) What are Alice and Bob’s decryption keys? So the decryption function for Alice is D_A≡C^a−1 (modp) and for Bob D_B≡C^b−1 (modp) which I assume we use these functions to generate the keys correct? If we do how do we find C?
Let's say Alice sells a USO with a strike at $5.50. I buy that. Then a few days later I sell to Bob. If Bob chooses to exercise, is assignment done by me or Alice?
A practical example: Let's say Bob stores all of Alice's personal information as notes on his Microsoft OneNote cloud account. Can Alice ask Microsoft to search through all of Bob's (and others') information?
Apple user Alice who has never studied or used bitcoin buys a pair of gloves with her employee discount for Android user Bob, whose been in bitcoin since 2013 and is moderately knowledgeable. Bob wants to show Alice how to download a wallet onto her phone and give her $25 of bitcoin to reimburse her for the gloves. What wallet should Bob put on Alice's phone? Alice asks, what now, how do I use it, can I buy coffee or groceries or gas with it. After some discussion, Bob just pays her in $USD. Are there wallets that trivially support a debit card for people like Alice? The Coinbase Shift card is an example, but alas, Coinbase says they are discontinuing it. Sadly, Bob doesn't see Alice using bitcoin anytime soon.
I know: Let's focus on the positives of Bitcoin and not sling mud.
However in light of my recent ban-badge (https://imgur.com/a/RYKEE) from /r/bitcoin for posting this;
I feel the need to poke back.
P2P: Erin sold Alice a gun… Bob is dead.
… Carol is in total shock that she is now a suspect in a criminal conspiracy to commit murder. Unfortunately for her, it was her channel, her money, that helped complete the purchase of the murder weapon.
You see, Alice had an open channel to Bob, Bob an open channel to Carol, Carol an open channel to Dave, and Dave an open channel to Erin.
It's not fair! How was Carol to know Dave was hooked up with a shady character like Erin? Carol didn't know what she was an accessory to. Perhaps with more information, she could have decided not to be part of this wicked web.
Unbeknownst to Carol, Bob, and presumably Dave; Alice used this channel network to buy a gun from Erin, and used that gun to shoot Bob dead.
Poor Bob, if only he had known the destination of Alice's transaction and what was being purchased then he would still be alive. Instead, he was a broker of his own destruction.
In the end, Alice sloppily left prints on the gun. It wasn't long before the cops caught up to her - and she sang like a canary.
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-onion
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016/04/07/couple-hosting-tor-exit-node-raided-by-cops-investigating-child-abuse/
Submitted for your approval: A tragic tale of murder, innocence lost and a man paying and being paid to die. A paradox of privacy you'll find only here… in the Lightning Zone.
Can Alice steal funds by broadcasting an old balance sheet, letting it look as if Bob wanted to steal and therefore bob gets punished because he wanted to steal. but now alice stole bons money. is this scenario possible?
A practical example: Let's say Bob stores all of Alice's personal information as notes on his Microsoft OneNote cloud account. Can Alice ask Microsoft to search through all of Bob's (and others') information?
