It aired on the TCM channel around 2006.
I think it was made in the US.
Hi, I'm in England.
As I've posted before I'm in a boundary dispute. This post is related to my driveway which leads to just my property. My neighbour wants to use this driveway to access her rear garden, hence the boundary dispute. The council have admitted the entire road (including my driveway) was not adopted highway. The council now want, without my permission, to adopt the entire private street and include my driveway as they state it is a part of the street.
I live on an estate of 9 properties. There is a central circle where cars can drive around and back on themselves. off of this central circle is a 3.2 metres wide, 26 metres long driveway that is a cul-de-sac that goes straight to the front of my property - serving only me - there are no private or public rights of way over it and it is currently fenced in. This piece of driveway is entirely within my boundary according to the plan on the TP1. The council have taken the decision to adopt the entire street, which includes my driveway, under Section 228 (7) Highways Act 1980, against my, the landowner, wishes. Is there anything I can do to stop this, such as put a private sign up? I do have legal representation and will go to him in time, but he is costly and I want to be better informed first. His previous advice was that I'd probably win a judicial review but I want to avoid this if possible.
I'm not even sure why my driveway comes up as a street.
Thanks.
I'm trying to take the Florida bar this July, and there is a June 15 deadline to receive MBE scores from other jurisdictions. To transfer from NY, you have to fill out a form and send it in to Albany (as opposed to doing it in the NCBE website), but the NY State Board of Bar Examiners office has been closed because Coronavirus, they don't answer the phone, and ... they have no email address!!
To summarize, I can't get in touch with them and so have no guarantee that they'll be able to send my MBE score by the June 15 deadline. Has anyone else run into this problem and found a workaround?
Unfortunately, I failed the D.C. bar exam and I'm trying to retake the bar exam ASAP. If at all possible I will see if D.C. will let me sit for one day of the exam (HIGHLY DOUBT THEY WILL LET ME BUT HOPING THEY WILL). If not I will likely sit for another exam in a UBE jurisdiction. I'm looking to transfer my UBE score to a state that recently joined the UBE. I reside here and I'm looking to practice here. If by some miracle I can sit for a day of the D.C. bar exam this September will I be able to cleanly transfer my UBE score from D.C. to another jurisdiction without having to sit for the bar exam again? Or, is it in my best interest to just retake the exam in its entirety and get the desired score that I need to transfer?
Hello,
My children and I currently reside in Texas (this is their home state) and their father is agreeing to allow us to move to the state of Oregon (which will be documented in the divorce settlement agreement). Their father will continue to live in Texas and has no plans to move. I previously read advice which recommended that jurisdiction be transferred after residing in the new state for 6 months (I will discuss this with my Texas attorney as well). I understand that if I do not transfer jurisdiction, that I would have to file all modifications in Texas, however, it appears from ORS 109.747 (section 2) that I may not be allowed to transfer jurisdiction because their father is living in Texas and not Oregon? Also, it appears that Texas will base child support off of their father's income regardless of my income, but Oregon would reduce the child support based on the amount of income that I make. The Texas laws appear to benefit the children more.
-
Can I transfer jurisdiction to Oregon after 6 months ? If so, what benefits are there to doing so?
-
Can I keep the case in Texas and not transfer it, what are the cons of this?
Thank you very much.
I'm watching Airheads (terribly underrated movie) and the local police is fighting with the SWAT team over who has jurisdiction. Does this type of thing actually occur?
Introduced: Sponsor: Rep. Rod Blum [R-IA1]
This bill was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources which will consider it before sending it to the House floor for consideration.
My understanding is it does not.
For context, I'm a centrist who voted for Bush, McCain, Obama, Hillary and now Biden. I didn't support impeachment, and don't think Trump stole the 2016 election. And if the election results are close, I wouldn't blame either party for contesting.
But I haven't been able to get a concrete answer on this one from my more right-skewing friends on the topic of a legitimate landslide. The responses have ranged from dismissive ("That will never happen so that's not a valid question") to combative ("Have you seen all the stuff the Democrats did to try to steal the election") .
And I don't necessarily blame them because my more left-leaning friends ask similar questions but in very loaded, accusatory ways, so I get why they're defensive.
But I legitimately want to understand the mindset here: what would be enough for you to accept an election-night concession, and what would your response be if that didn't happen?
