A list of puns related to "Units Of Measure Directive"
Do they hit you through the protocol still? I was reading the rare rules section and it states they ignore all terrain traits that improve their saving throws. This would still be considered a terrain trait even though it's a command protocol right? I'm pretty certain they still punch through, just want to double check.
First of all I have nothing against Age Of Noob as his videos are really educational and informational. However his video on both landsknecht and firelancer created some misleading waves in the community.
A "equal resource" fight is not a serious representation of a unit's strength. Take simple example: Springalds were very oppressive in terms of meta but they hardly win any fight in equal resources even before nerfs. Same goes for all siege units. Supply should also be taken into account. 200 knights are certainly more expensive than 200 spears, but you cannot build more than 200 spears because of the supply caps. There are also research cost that is not discussed. Grenadiers are really strong units, but getting imperial twice is a huge cost and hence you face them much less often. Reasons add up.
Edit: I was pointed out to be wrong about the elephant, edited them out to prevent misinformation. Elephant do not win against majority of the units on equal resources.
Same with landsknecht and firelancer. Any aoe units will look broken without any micro on both sides because, well they do aoe damage. The problem with those test is that they do not reflect the realistic situation whatsoever, and they do not take skill difference into account. Landsknecht dies to archers too fast, firelancer requires much investment to get to.
If we continous to regard "equal res" test as measure of balance, soon all units will be required to nerfed because all of them can look broken in certain scenario.
Download link: https://apps.apple.com/app/uniter-live-unit-converter/id1589272507
Launch Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDKtJ_651LY
Hi all, Iβm the indie developer behind a new unit conversion app called Uniter. It launched three days ago on 9to5Mac and has already been downloaded a few thousand times.
There are lots of unit conversion apps on the App Store. Whatβs different about Uniter, is that it understands the text and intelligently replaces all occurrences of units with those in your preferred system (Imperial, Metric, or U.K.). Itβs much faster to use than other apps.
Example uses:
The app is free with some unique features available under an annual or lifetime license. If you think itβs too expensive or some features should be free, please let me know and Iβll consider making changes in the future.
For the giveaway, just leave a comment letting me know where in your life you encounter units that you have to convert. Iβll select 15 Redditors in 24h whoβll receive a free lifetime license to Uniter Pro!
The giveaway is over. You had some really great ideas in your comments! I sent promo codes through DM to:
YARRRDS
Daughter: How long until dinner?
Me/ my wife: About three blueyβs
When measuring, what is the maximum amount of accuracy physically possible you can get?
I am 12 minutes tall.
A website for Macintosh computer users reviews an app for converting metric and US units. Available for iPhones and iPads.
>Get units you encounter automatically converted into your preferred unit system (Metric, Imperial, or UK). Uniter intelligently picks the most readable, fitting unit.
The premium version has a really useful-sounding feature:
>Camera view converter: point your camera at any text or label and see converted text overlayed on top of it. Take a still to share it with a friend
It raises a few questions in my mind:
β’ Are the conversions unnecessarily precise? Is there a long trail of decimal dust after the decimal point?
β’ Can it deal with mis-stated units? For example, overhead height signs in parking stations saying 2100MM or 2.1 MTRS, instead of 2100 mm or 2.1 m, and my local supermarket where the price signs on the shelves say things like "200gms" instead of "200 g".
(Edited the final sentence for clarity.)
Hi, everyone! So, I'm a volunteer firefighter with an interest in hazardous materials response. One of the aspects that I've always wondered about is the radiological side of things. I've done extensive research into nuclear disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima and have always pondered this question. I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could help me out.
Order.
The next item of business is a debate on SM105 in the name of the Scottish Government. The question for debate is whether this Parliament approves the motion.
Motion to approve The Traffic Signs (Units of Measure) (Scotland) Regulations and Directions 2020
That this parliament approves The Traffic Signs (Units of Measure) (Scotland) Regulations and Direction 2020 as laid before Parliament today.
This Motion was submitted by The Rt. Honourable Sir /u/Tommy2Boys KT KCB KBE CT LVO PC MSP MP, First Minister of Scotland on behalf of the 10th Scottish Government
The Regulations and Directions can be found here
Opening Speech
Presiding Officer,
Several years ago, and for no apparent reason, Scotland decided to diverge from the rest of the United Kingdom. We will all have noticed it. Whenever we drive between England and Scotland, the border has got just that little bit more confusing. Why? Because Scotland uses kilometres and metres rather than miles and yards. Again, why? Well I donβt know. It frankly seems nonsensical to have such a difference. So, I wonβt go into some great long detailed speech, I will simply say what is obvious for everyone in this chamber. Rather than putting up borders between Scotland and England, letβs tear them down, and letβs vote for this motion today.
This debate will end at the close of business on the 14th of September 2020.
Hey there,
I have a requirement that goes against NetSuite leading practices but I can't believe there is no workaround for it :)
Unless I'm mistaken, NetSuite's leading practices against UOM is to create a Units Type linked to the way on items can be purchased, stocked and sold.
For example, if Item A can be purchased is pallets of 200 units (which are 20 box of 10 units), I can then store in box and sell in units. This way I should create a Units Type with the UOM: each, x10 and x200.
But if Item B can be purchased is pallets of 200 units (which are 10 box of 20 units), I can then store in box and sell in units. This way I should create a Units Type with the UOM: each, x20 and x200.
That would mean that I need to create multiple Units Types for similar UOM...
So here we are, we did not follow the best practices and now we are stuck by having dozens of choices in transactions because the Units Type for "each" contains all sorts of boxes sizes and pallet sizes...
I thought about creating a custom record with the item as parent and the list of units that someone could manage on the item level. But creating a custom field list/record to units gives me the full list of all units in the system and I can't find a way to filter (I did not try scripting yet) it based on the Item Units Type (FYI, the UOM is a subrecord of the Units Type).
Then, I thought about having a custom column on the transaction (which would update the native units column) to get the custom record units filter per the item selected on the line level... But the dropdown list is showing the internal ID of the custom record instead of the UOM (I remember having this issue in the past, but I don't remember if/how I solved it).
Sooooo..... What are your thoughts? I would love to be able to just restrict the native list of units on transaction level, but I don't think we can...
Thank you for reading :)
So I'm thinking of doing a Barclay style volatility play where I sell options with implied volatility above historical averages and buy options that are below their historic volatility so in turn earning capital gains when they revert to mean.
However my problem is how do I measure and even more importantly what is the unit of measure of volatility?
For options we can see IV, but what about for the stock price itself?
Where can I find a website or a tool that can give me that data?
A (s)entimeter
For starters, I'd like to point out I don't intend to reduce the whole legal/philosophical mechanism to a single function, but rather explore a secondary effect of the prime directive in an universe where attemps to "fix" history or win wars through time travel is relatively common.
What I propose, basically, is that the pivotal moment in which a civilization develops interestellar travel is a hot spot for hostile alien time travellers. Humanity alone was targeted in such a manner at least twice, by the suliban and the borg.
So if any civilization were to go out promoting FTL tech to every species it encounters in the universe, that civilization would also become a target for every single enemy their "pupils" might encounter for the rest of their history.
As seen on Voyager's "year of hell", a hostile time travel mission may last decades (in the perspective of the agents involved in it, of course), with an ever increasing scope of interferences needed to achieve ideal results.
Therefore, it is safer to let civilizations develop the tech that will ultimately allow them stablish broad interestellar borders on their own, to avoid being pushed into infinite temporal cold wars.
As a matter of fact, it is feasible that since star trek doesn't portray a single civilization with a philosophy of limitless tech sharing, such civilizations, if they ever existed in the timelines depicted in the shows, they might have been erased in that fashion.
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.