Mccullough Puns

Dr. Peter McCullough is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons or AAPS for short. The name sounds innocent enough and even credible but is actually a conservative political advocacy group that promotes blatantly false information.

The associations journal: Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S) have published the following articles/commentaries that claim:

• That human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus is not a cause for concern.[83][84]
• That HIV does not cause AIDS.[85]
• That the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[86]
• That there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.[6]
• That there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.[6]
• That government efforts to encourage smoking cessation and emphasize the addictive nature of nicotine are misguided.[87]

Dr. Peter McCullough's membership within such a unscientific and blatantly political organization raises some troubling questions. If he's okay with being involved with an organization that makes the above listed claims what else is he okay with?

Link to AAPS Wikipedia page: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons - Wikipedia

Joe Rogan Experience Podcast:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0aZte37vtFTkYT7b0b04Qz

I’ve had 5 friends send me links to this podcast and have seen a ton of other people share it across various social media.

I’m assuming it’s about Covid because of the people who sent me the link but honestly I really don’t want to listen to Joe Rogan talk about Covid for a few hours. I am hoping someone who listened to it can let me know why a bunch of people thought it was worth sharing and if anything substantial was talked about.

Thanks!

Edit: wow. That was interesting. Made the post yesterday, worked all day today and checked only just now.

Thanks for the replies, I didn’t delete or remove any posts so don’t DM me complaining. I appreciate the fairly civil dialogue and for anybody who got downvoted into oblivion, idk what to tell ya. I still appreciate your feedback!

Have a safe and happy holiday season everyone!

The other day Joe Rogan had Dr. Peter McCullough on his podcast, a controversial guest. He is an anti-vaxxer, and known for "debunking" current claims about COVID-19, and it's vaccines. Most of his scientific claims involve cherry-picking studies and misusing public databases that wasn't intended to make the claims he tries to make with him. He is so discredited that he is even being used by Baylor to stop using their University as his credentials.

He is most notable for claiming things such as; COVID-19 vaccines are being used as a "depopulation tool" and that a "vaccine Holocaust" is occurring. Of course, Joe Rogan blindly nods and agrees with him throughout whole entire duration of the podcast without questioning him once.

So, when one user on the sub makes a post titled "Something you should know about Dr. Peter McCullough" detailing how much of a fraud and hack this guy is; it rises to the top very rapidly, but not without some controversy. Other users are ready to defend him and Joe Rogan to death, no matter what it takes. As such drama ensues.

Controversial

Kinda interesting that Pfizer just announced that their new Covid-19 drug is effective against Omicron. This was immediately after we discovered that Pfizer’s vaccine is not as effective at preventing Omicron hospitalizations. Pharma companies like Pfizer had a huge financial incentive to muddy the waters in order to boost their value by pushing their vaccine above everything else. [+311]

Why is it that Rogan fans are over indexed in stupidity? [+57]

You folks are worse than the ultra religious when it comes to protecting your narrative. Publishing articles that only support what you believe to be true is not science. It's dogmatic. Publishing controversial articles that can be read and rebutted is the definition of science. [+117]

[none of that even if true changes anything he said on the podcast. it sounds like you ar

Fixed Link:

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/joe-rogan-interview-with-peter-mccullough-contains-multiple-false-and-unsubstantiated-claims-about-the-covid-19-pandemic-and-vaccines/

“Key Points

Question What proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread is associated with transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from persons with no symptoms?

Findings In this decision analytical model assessing multiple scenarios for the infectious period and the proportion of transmission from individuals who never have COVID-19 symptoms, transmission from asymptomatic individuals was estimated to account for more than half of all transmission.

Meaning The findings of this study suggest that the identification and isolation of persons with symptomatic COVID-19 alone will not control the ongoing spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract

Importance Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is readily transmitted person to person. Optimal control of COVID-19 depends on directing resources and health messaging to mitigation efforts that are most likely to prevent transmission, but the relative importance of such measures has been disputed.

Objective To assess the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in the community that likely occur from persons without symptoms.

Design, Setting, and Participants This decision analytical model assessed the relative amount of transmission from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals across a range of scenarios in which the proportion of transmission from people who never develop symptoms (ie, remain asymptomatic) and the infectious period were varied according to published best estimates. For all estimates, data from a meta-analysis was used to set the incubation period at a median of 5 days. The infectious period duration was maintained at 10 days, and peak infectiousness was varied between 3 and 7 days (−2 and +2 days relative to the median incubation period). The overall proportion of SARS-CoV-2 was varied between 0% and 70% to assess a wide range of possible proportions.

Main Outcomes and Measures Level of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals.

Results The baseline assumptions for the model were that peak infectiousness occurred at the median of symptom onset and that 30% of individuals with infection never develop symptoms and are 75% as infectious as those who do develop symptoms. Combined, these baseline assumptions imply that persons with infection who never develop sym

its amazing how between them they are able to completely destroy the narrative without devolving into any tinfoil hat stuff that we usually see from people (Controlled opposition im looking at you)

The biggest thing ive taking from the shows,that no government has yet to address is the lack of pre hospitalization treatment of covid.

The lack of use of drugs or therapies that have shown positive effects of preventing serious disease and progression of the disease.

its mind blowing to think that up to 85 percent of the deaths from covid (that is if the numbers are right and all those who died didnt die in a car crash or where shot in the head but died from covid) could have prevented with simple drugs and treatment thats over 4.5 million people world wide.

thats not even talking about the lack of efficacy of the vaccines or the side effects. or theplanning of the vaccines and the release of the disease from the wuhan lab.

any body who can still believe in the narrative now is a willfully admitting wanton ignorance and submission to a authority structure that holds nothing but contempt for them.