Hi wondering if it would be cheaper to buy some power line adapters and send 600 mbits to my pc from my living room to my bedroom and still get the full speed on a 50 year old houses wires
In a not too far future, I will have fiber installed into our house, the offer I fell for was a 50% drop in installation cost and a speed of 500/500 mbit/s.
But will the gear I got handle these speeds?
Edgerouter X, Unifi Switch 8 p 150W, AP AC Lite, Unifi Switch 8P, Unifi Flex Mini.
I think it will.... but I have no idea really for years now I have been rocking 100/100 mbit/s with no issues whatsoever. But a 500% increase in speed... will it hold? :)
I've had GF for a week so of course I'm testing throughput constantly. From the supplied "Google WiFi" puck (running speed test from app) and only getting around 600 to 700 up and down. I've tried directly from the admin console on my new Netgear router (WiFi 6 AX1800 Access Point WAX204) and get the same. GF send a tech (contractor) out to my house and he replaced the fiber jack inside and we went through all the obvious troubleshooting on the clients (laptops and routers) even though the speed tests having nothing to do with any pc's on my network.
The tech used his Chromebook connected directly to the fiber jack (USB-C to Ethernet). After almost 2 hours the tech left and I'm assuming nothing will change. I thought I would be getting over 800 Mbit/sec on average. But I could be wrong and even if this never changes I'm still stoked on my speeds compared to the slows speeds of Spectrum (300 down and 20 up).
Hey guys, hoping someone can help me with this.
I have pfSense installed on a
HP EliteDesk 800 G1 Desktop Mini PC
Intel i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz
8 Gigabytes of RAM and SSD
Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection is on em0
Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 7260 is on iwm0 in dmesg but its not available to choose from the list of interfaces
I have two 2.5 Gbps USB NICs
https://plugable.com/products/usbc-e2500
ugen0.3: <Realtek USB 10/100/1G/2.5G LAN> at usbus0
ugen0.4: <Realtek USB 10/100/1G/2.5G LAN> at usbus0
https://getlabsdone.com/how-to-fix-usb-ethernet-not-recognized-by-pfsense/ I used this article to get these to stick.
After which pfSense finds these as usable NICs
The install was up and running fine, had it hooked up as my internet router but the speeds were terrible. So I took it out of its position as a router (wifey was getting annoyed with constant internet outages) and put the old router back, but I have it hooked up directly to my PC, same installation and iperf maxes out at 448 Mbits/sec. iperf installed directly on the pfSense box and on my Windows box.
both use the RTL8156 chipset and work fine on Fedora and Ubuntu server and Windows 10 running iperf between two hosts using these, get around 2.3 Gbps, basically what I should be getting. And this is with Fedora on the HP Elite Desk and Ubuntu server on my Raspberry Pi, so I know its not the hardware.
Whats stranger is the speed tests like speedtest.net were even worse, 2-300 at best. If I took the pfSense box out of line and put my old router back, back to solid 940Mbits down and up. I have gig fiber via Ziply fiber.
Is getting these to work fully on pfSense a lost cause? I really do like how great it is, but I wouldn't wanna sacrifice that much bandwidth.
Thanks!
I'm reading Stalling's 'Computer Organization and Architecture' to help me understand internal memory organization, but I'm a bit confused. (For reference I've found the same example from the textbook here on page 18 of this PowerPoint).
What I don't understand is, if we use a 2048x2048x4 array, wouldn't that mean the total size (i.e. number of bits that can be stored) would be 2048x2048x4 = 16,777,216? But, to my knowledge, 16Mbit is equal to 2MB, and if you take a word to be 4 bits, then wouldn't that mean the storage capacity would be 2x1024x1024x4 = 8,388,608?
On another note, if anyone knows of any resources on 2D, 2.5D and 3D memory organization, I would be grateful!
So I have a self-built computer, motherboard is the MSI Tomahawk B450 Max.
On all the phones, the speed is indeed 200 mbits, on the laptops of my family the speed also reaches that, even with the ethernetcable I use for my computer, so it can't be the cable I think.
I have tried to put it on Full Duplex 1GBit in the adapter settings, turned off all the power savings measures in the adapter settings, updated the LAN drivers on my mother, my ISP did a router reset. Nothing, it still sticks at 90-100 Mbits per second, just like before the upgrade. I truly don't know what else it could be.
I think I might have a usb 3 network card in storage, I can try that.
Anybody have any suggestions? I am using a Cat5e cable.
Edit: Tried a USB 3.1 to gigabit ethernet adapter thingy, still at 100....
Edit: I uninstalled the LAN drivers, restarted, installed the latest LAN drivers again, restarted. No dice
Updated AMD chipset on my motherboard. Restarted, nothing.
Flashed an updated BIOS, nothing.
EDit: Solved, I tried a different cable and that worked. This makes NO sense because my own cable worked on my sisters laptop.
ROHDE& SCHWARZ Hardware Firewall Typ GP-U100/200 v2
Hardware:
CPU: Intel J1900 2.4GHz 4core
RAM: 4 GB RAM up to 8GB
HDD: 32 GB SSD SATA 2.5"
Price: 80€
Can it handle fq_codel?
Does anyone have any suggestions why my MSFS keeps doing this? I've tried a few things like the netsh command in cmd prompt, and delivery optimization settings. It seems to keep downloading if I have something downloading along side it so it doesn't go over 5 Mbit/s. I'm a bit stumped and frustrated and can't think of what else I can do. Any suggestions?
I have a Gigabit network router all PCs in the network have 1 Gbps speed. However my new PC I built today has not and I am really desperate as I have tried everything.
- DIfferent cable
- Different switch port
- I have tried to manually set 1 Gbps speed in windows, the settings seems persistent even after restart, but speed is still capped at 100 Mbit
- I use Cat5e cable
- NIC Intel I219-v is 1 Gbps
Ultimately I want to use Linux Debian, I have installed windows just to test the NIC because I had issues on Debian as well.
Any ideas please ?
Issue Solved:
Even when there was a text on the cable saying it is a "Cat.5e Gigabit Ethernet Cable" when I inspected the port, there were only 4 out for 8 pins connected, so it was probably some scam cheap cable and I did not noticed I had 2 cables like this. I used a different 3rd cable and checked the port and it has all 8 pins connected. Now it works at 1Gbps. Thanks for suggestions.
In my home network, I have a TP-Link AC1750 Archer A7 v5.0 router.
I have iPerf running in server mode on a CentOS box connected with ethernet cat6. I have a Dell laptop with an Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 connected to the AP on 5Ghz. It has the most updated drivers, Driver Date: 3/3/2021 Version 22.40.0.7
First of all the WiFi NIC only shows a link speed of 866.7 Mbps, which I would think it should show 1.2 or 1.3 Gbits. It's 6 feet away from the AP.
Here are the results iPerf against the hardwired server from the wifi laptop
PS C:\tools\iperf-3.1.3-win64> .\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.1.177 -p 696 -N
Connecting to host 192.168.1.177, port 696
[ 4] local 192.168.1.178 port 2670 connected to 192.168.1.177 port 696
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 36.8 MBytes 308 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 38.2 MBytes 321 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 38.6 MBytes 324 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 36.2 MBytes 304 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 36.5 MBytes 306 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 37.2 MBytes 312 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 38.1 MBytes 321 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 35.0 MBytes 294 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 36.6 MBytes 307 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 39.0 MBytes 327 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 372 MBytes 312 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 372 MBytes 312 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
PS C:\tools\iperf-3.1.3-win64> .\iperf3.exe -c 192.168.1.177 -p 696 -w 412K
Connecting to host 192.168.1.177, port 696
[ 4] local 192.168.1.178 port 5476 connected to 192.168.1.177 port 696
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 32.0 MBytes 268 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 37.9 MBytes 318 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 35.6 MBytes 299 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 38.5 MBytes 323 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 34.5 MBytes 289 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 35.8 MBytes 300 Mbits/sec
`[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 38.5 MB
... keep reading on reddit ➡Gambit Rewards just zero'd all of their users balances today. Many users lost hundreds and even thousands of dollars when they did nothing wrong. This is an exit scam which swagbucks has endorsed and they are taking down posts related to this subject. I repeat, DO NOT redeem for gambit cards.
Hi wondering if it would be cheaper to buy some power line adapters and send 600 mbits to my pc from my living room to my bedroom and still get the full speed on a 50 year old houses wires
