Hi, I'm a 25 y/o. My life style is pretty healthy now, other than sitting alot, I'm lifting heavy regularly, eating healthy, good sleep 8-9 hours, low stress. On paper it's all good but what should I take as well? How can I prevent my self or minimize the risk significantly of getting diseases like dementia or Parkinson?
I'm taking every day
Adderal 20mg i have adhd
400mg magnesium glycinate
6000 u/l vitamin d+k2 drops
Zinc 25mg
Iron 30mg (deficient)
Omega 3 3g
L citurlin 10g
Creatine 3g
Eating foods like chicken breast potatoes salads with spinach onions broccoli kale olive oil, every type of nuts, yogurt, whey and basicly anything almost, lost all appetite for garbage food. Switched to fruits around 4-5 a days depends on the season.
I got some kind obsession I guess but for some reason I'm really holding into life and want to live if as healthy and long as I can. As I see how fragile and short it is I'm really scared of the future. Especially since I'm atleasy exposed to garbage air pollution at night, disgustingly hormone growth meat and fruits that's have so many sprayed shit that no inscet want to touch it, imagine such shining big tasteless strawberry you see. It's all covered in chemicals.
Sorry I got ranting
On Thursday, January 20 at 7 pm, Dr. Gibney will be LIVE on Dadvice TV to discuss new data from medical trials and other proven ways to preserve kidney function. Dr. Gibney is on the cutting edge of kidney care and this will be his first time on Dadvice TV live. The progress and discoveries his team has made are absolutely amazing. Join the LIVE broadcast at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrTy03Htock
James @ Dadvice TV
https://preview.redd.it/ez7axe2mwib81.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ce5736dec7e23b56d88a103b6209b472080f8ea8
Hello, I am into hobby rocketry, and I am looking into using metal leading edges on the fins of a supersonic rocket to prevent the large amounts of heat flux from damaging the fin's core material. How can I determine an effective upper temperature limit for each alloy?
I have found several aluminum alloys with good thermal properties. However, I am not sure if they will maintain structural integrity on the fins at their high operating temperature. It is easy to find the melting temperature of each alloy, but the strength of the alloys will still decrease at temperatures below melting. Would the hot-work temperature be an effective limit?
I am trying to find the official name of this problem, but my google searches are turning up nothing. I ran across it while programming. I appreciate any help you can provide.
An exponential equation with the relevant variables is as follows.
https://preview.redd.it/vsermjl6i1681.png?width=150&format=png&auto=webp&s=0dfa762ad06288fcd557f5e8c2bd6f920d0602ca
I know that a is the sharpness of growth, b is the asymptote, and c translates the graph along the x-axis.
Different exponential functions, with the same rate of growth, all intercepting the y-axis at 1 can be drawn as follows.
https://preview.redd.it/fu81ofdci1681.png?width=744&format=png&auto=webp&s=3807d97afca5b31677acd45c919586f5d862806c
We can change c to g(b) given that the y-intercept is constant when b and c change, so I assume b and c are related.
https://preview.redd.it/dga9chvoi1681.png?width=189&format=png&auto=webp&s=f757048de3ebd6398ffa5792645167b7001ed8b6
If we add the intercept itself as a variable, the problem might be expressed as follows, where we use c as our y-intercept.
https://preview.redd.it/lmuw6nn6j1681.png?width=175&format=png&auto=webp&s=c6b9bbe88746b9e9285e3c516e158e80ac2d3bdc
We can see that g(b,2) is a different set of irrational numbers than g(b,1).
https://preview.redd.it/ksy6dj09m1681.png?width=744&format=png&auto=webp&s=d8a8c3af6be77d4b3a026f4ef7edaec8242287a5
I tried plotting g(b,c) but I'm not good enough at math to figure out what kind of function it is.
What is this problem called? Can you show me the mathematician who solved it, or direct me to the third grade algebra lesson that I was zoned out during? Thanks.
Is there a safe way to preserve function on HRT or is that impossible, meaning it can always be the case for some people to experience a significant change in libido, ability to get/hold an erection, etc.?
Disclaimer, this is sort of a repost of previous post (below), however I am going to try to word it better.
https://www.reddit.com/r/arduino/comments/sbrm3c/limit_switch_condition_is_running_without_being/
Project Background:
I am working on different display types for a 4x20 LCD-I2C such as scrollable menus, toggling displays, counters, etc. I have a larger project in mind, but I am just working on these smaller displays I will eventually use for said project. For a user interface, I am using limit switches as buttons because I had limit switches on hand. The code I wrote uses the ezButton library to read the limit switches.
Problem:
For one of the display functions I am working on, it prompts the user to enter times in Hour:Min:Sec format. I have a while boolean loop is true loop for each time segment which allows the user to count up or down the value, changing the display accordingly. The final while boolean loop is true prompts the user whether or not they want to use this value or to go back and edit the values again. Essentially the function is 4 while loops nested in one loop. The problem I am having is that when it gets to the forth and final loop, the arduino reads the limit switch as being pressed even though it isn't. What is strange is that this code works in the other loops and functions I have made.
Attached code:
I am going to attach three pieces of code. The first piece is the stripped down while loop I am using to read the outputs from the limit switches. The second part is the four nested loop function without the LCD functions in them that show what I am trying to achieve. The third piece of code is the four nested loops containing the LCD. Both code 1 and code 2 run as expected, but once the LCD is included, the limit switch behaves differently. When I press select on the hour loop, the function reads select on the final loop, when it shouldn't.
I am assuming that it is it a code issue because it only happens on that final loop and because the same limit switch and functionality works in all the other functions.
If anyone has an idea on what is going wrong, I would greatly appreciate it.
Code Piece 1: GNERAL FUNCTION SETUP
#include <ezButton.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <Arduino.h>
// LIMIT SWITCHES
ezButton limitSwitch_UP(13);
ezBLet Passability (P) be defined as the function of huntiness over time where huntiness increases infinitely with infinitely diminishing returns.
Let Schrodinger's Trap (Tₛ) be equal to the y-value of the passability function as it approaches the asymptote y=woman as time tends to infinity.
This is to say that Schrodinger's trap is that huntiness value equal to the huntiness as time tends to ∞ huntiness approaches woman (F),
P=H/t [Definition]
Lim (t-->[∞-n]) P= Tₛ for all n>0. [Definition]
Lim (t-->∞) P = F [Assumption]
Lim (n-->0)[Lim(t-->[∞-n]) P]= F [Infinity property of asymptotic functions]
Lim (n-->0)[Tₛ] = F [substitution]
Therefore Tₛ = F (trans women are women) for all sufficiently large t values.
I have an omen 15 dc-1093tx, I set battery limit to 80% and it still charges above 80%... Is there any fix?
My bios is updated..
I have an object called myCached and its type is known as
interface MyCache {
a: {
b: {
c: Target[];
d: string;
};
};
}
Where Target is the type of the item in one of its property on a specific level, this type Target is known too. Assume Target is like this
type Target = "toRemove1" | "toRemove2" | "toPreserve1" | "toPreserve2";
In the example here, myCache is
const cache: MyCache = {
a: {
b: {
c: ['toRemove1', 'toPreserve1', 'toRemove2', 'toPreserve2'],
d: "irrelevant"
},
}
}
And I have an array of items that I need to remove. They also have the type of Target as in
const thingsToRemove: Target[] = ["toRemove1", "toRemove2"];
And I am trying to come up with a function that can traverse this object and filter out items on a specific level. The way I designed this function is that it takes a transformer object and it travers the object and it provides the function for filtering. I want to type it properly so the users of this function can reply on the auto complete provided by the TS compiler and type checking to make sure that this function lands correctly on the correct level, in this case it is the Target level.
This is my code
type MappedTransform<T> = {
[K in keyof T]?: MappedTransform<T[K]> | ((params: T[K]) => T[K]);
};
type Entries<T> = { [K in keyof T]-?: [K, T[K]] }[keyof T];
function traverse<R>(cache: R, transformObject: MappedTransform<R>): R {
return (Object.entries(transformObject) as Array<
Entries<MappedTransform<R>>
>).reduce(reduceTransformNode, cache);
}
const reduceTransformNode = <R, K extends keyof R>(
cacheNode: R,
[transformKey, transformValue]: [
K,
MappedTransform<R[K]> | ((params: R[K]) => R[K]) | undefined
]
): R => {
const { [transformKey]: node } = cacheNode;
if (typeof transformValue === "undefined") return cacheNode;
const newCacheValue =
typeof transformValue === "function"
? (transformValue as (params: R[K]) => R[K])(node)
: traverse(transformValue as R[K], node);
return {
...cacheNode,
[transformKey]: newCacheValue
};
};
const x = traverse(cache, {
a: {
b: {
// 👇Need to use Type `Target` to make sure that the transformer function lands on the type of `Target` exactly
c: (node) => node.filter((s) => !thingsToRemove.includes(s))
}
}
});
So normally when we do proofs for derivatives we use the limit definition of the derivative to prove it. But when we prove inverse functions such as ln or arcsin, we use implicit differentiation and differentiation rules, not the limit defintio. Is there a way to use the limit definition to prove inverse functions derivatives?(i kinda tried it but it went nowhere)
Hi guys, I have these questions here along with my workings: https://imgur.com/a/ABsBbst
For qns 1 and 2, I know that my final answer is correct, but I'm not sure if my workings are correct.
For qns 3 the answer given is DNE, but I'm not sure why.
Thank you!
