A list of puns related to "Graham Broad"
I was really happy with Lloyd's game on the weekend. He laid a couple of crucial tackles in those final minutes and was a big reason that we held on to win. I think Connor, baker, Townsend and maybe even grigg could go
In this post, I explore racial preferences at elite universities in the United States. This main points can be outlined in the following two parts:
Note:
Before presenting the demographics of students at elite universities, we should first understand the racial demographics of the college-aged portion of the general population so that we have a baseline to use for comparison. Recent census data hosted by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) contains estimates of the population disaggregated by different age groups. One of the age groups includes individuals between the ages of 18 and 24 years old. I'll use this age group as an estimate of the college-aged population. This data shows that, as of 2020, the percentage of the population within this age range by race/ethnicity was as follows:
Warning: unedited; questionable language.
Previously: The Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away. Let us all be comforted that in the year in which He took two of television's brightest shining stars, Brett Somers and Charles Nelson Reilly, He also gave us Rock Of Love. A belated birthday shout-out goes to the heavenly father.
We begin in the morning, with the girls sleeping off their previous night of debauchery -- some harder than others, Tiffany -- and Bret in the gym. I...don't think he really knows how to use that equipment. He has sixteen "of the most gorgeous women in the world" left. Has the syphilis made Bret go blind, do you think? In any case, he needs to get to know them more intimately. That's right -- it's the handjob episode!
Tiffany is clearly still the talk of the house. Lacey notes that Tiffany got plowed and really didn't make a good first impression. We get a little flashback sequence, including one previously unseen moment of Tiffany slurring, "So how 'bout the Bearssssssss?" She is truly the John Goodman of buxom alcoholic redheads. She is considered a drunken mess among girls who really like to drink, so you do the math. The fact that Tiffany is still in the house makes Lacey raise an eyebrow, but she thinks she'll be gone soon enough. Tiffany says that she got a little extreme on the first night, and that today is just going to be more low-key.
Meanwhile, Erin is telling some of the other girls about her ex-fiancΓ©. Turns out she was supposed to be getting married this May. The others are shocked. And then who should be standing on the stairs eavesdropping like Mr. Furley but Heather. Also like Mr. Furley, Heather apparently has one bad ear, because she missed the "ex" part. She can't believe Erin has a fiancΓ©, and is determined to get Erin's phony ass (and circus boobs) out of there. Erin adds that her fiancΓ© told her he didn't love her anymore, and that was the end. When even circus boobs can't keep a man, it's a bad scene.
As it turns out, to hang with a rock star you have to drink all day long, so the girls hit the bar early. I find no fault with that. If I could start every day with a couple well-appointed mimosas, I'd be a much more pleasant person. Heather says that she got the party started, and some of the girls form a little band on the stage. It sounds like glass breaking and cats wailing. Bret, thinking his old bandmates have come for a little action, leaves the weight machine and rushes into the main part of the hou
... keep reading on reddit β‘So, first things first let me get my investing background out of the way. I am 21, and relatively new. I started around April of this year, but I've been eyeing the stock market for a while, since I was 17, but since I didn't have a stable income stream, I couldn't invest until recently. I heard about meme stocks but as I knew I wanted to be an index investor. First I bought VOO then moved to VTI. I was a boglehead at heart and still am, more or less. Also, when I say things such as "This cannot happen", it really means "In my opinion, this cannot happen." I figured it'd be obvious from now on that this is mostly just my opinion. I'm not saying I'm 100% right, but I figured since it'd be annoying to constantly repeat, "this is my opinion", I'd mention this nonetheless. Since this is a Long post, if you'd like, just see if you find your argument in bold, as I tried to go over the main counter-arguments for them.
I, like many others, have discovered LETFs, but people scare people away from truly investing in them while spouting the same repeated things, ad nauseum. I also have seen a lot of TQQQ posts recently, which.... lowkey brings up alarm bells. If history truly does repeat itself, people used the hell out of leverage and LETFs during the dot-com bubble and the 2008 crash.. With all the talk of the market being in a bubble (And for the record, when i mention "the market", I strictly mean the S&P 500, or VOO/SPY), then then yikes..? But nonetheless I haven't quite seen anything thoroughly in depth, which is what I strive to do with this post. So, if I succeeded, let me know at the end. I'm not going to cut corners, as I've mentioned in the title. This will be long, so get some snacks if you'd like.
Anyway, speaking of crashes, people often say stuff like:***"What about Dot-Com crash and 2008? You'd still be at a loss today from the dot-com crash if TQQQ existed back then!"***
True... But, let's go over why one is not like the other: The dot-com bubble is not what TQQQ is currently. Some parts of the market, such as electric vehicle companies such as RIVN, TESLA, NKLA, meme stocks such as GME, AMC, or some penny stocks may be in a bubble, but the market as a whole is not in a bubble. It may head for a correction, but the whole reason why the Dot-Com Bubble popped was because the market was euphoric, with P/E ratios completely bonkers for the companies that are essentially garbage. Take this [chart](https:/
Hello all,
Greetings from London.
I would love to get some opinions on this interesting piece on the "Tesla-financial complex" in the Financial Times.
I found this article immensely fascinating and disturbing too. I have a few points:
I have pasted the article below:
The rally in Teslaβs shares has lifted the overall stock market value of Elon Muskβs electric carmaker to over $1.1tn, making it one of the most valuable companies in the world. This year alone it has added almost $475bn in market capitalisation, equal to a Procter & Gamble, a JPMorgan β or two McDonaldβs.
However, the real importance and wider footprint of what might be called the βTesla-financial complexβ far outstrips the companyβs market capitalisation. This is thanks to a vast, tangled web of dependent investment vehicles, corporate emulators and an enormous associated derivatives market of unparalleled breadth, depth and hyperactivity.
Combined, these factors mean Teslaβs influence over the ebb and flow of the stock market is far greater than even its size would imply. It may even be historically unrivalled in its wider impact, some analysts say.
βWe donβt really have the language to describe Tesla any more,β says Michael Green, chief strategist at Simplify Asset Management. βItβs like explaining to a person in a two-dimensional world the concept of βupβ.β
The Tesla-financial complex is a phenomenon that many investors β whether passive index funds, traditional mutual funds, hedge funds
... keep reading on reddit β‘Alibaba is a great business and will continue to grow for the foreseeable future. There are rumblings within China and significant changes are taking place in Chinese society. It is impossible to know what may take place and what this means for Alibaba. Some of it does make sense, because some people in China have made an obscene amount of money, and the govt is moving towards a more traditional socialist path requiring corporations to share their wealth with mainstream society.
As value investors we accept that macroeconomics or geopolitics plays no role in our investing process as these are fundamentally unpredictable.
Now, we must not forget what Mr. Benjamin Graham taught us - "A stock represents an ownership in a business, it is not simply a piece of paper that is traded again and again".
The problem I have is with Alibaba's ownership structure. Specifically the VIE structure.
Yahoo at one point of time owned 43% of Alibaba, and it suffered deeply because of this structure.
Brief history lesson: Alipay/Ant Group grew up within Alibaba and became Chinaβs largest payments processing company (think Mastercard, Visa, Paypal, and Stripe all in one). It was for many years one of the most valuable parts of Alibaba. Then, only a few short years ago in 2011, Alipay was stolen from the US and European investors in Alibabaβs VIE structure when the founder and CEO Jack Ma unilaterally transferred 100% ownership of Alipay into a different company controlled solely by himself.
One of the shareholders hurt was Yahoo who were a big early investor in the Alibaba VIE, amassing a 43% stake. Yet, despite that very substantial ownership, Yahoo did not even find out about the transaction until months later. When they discovered what had happened, they were of course outraged and launched into legal proceedings.
***However due to the VIE structure, Yahoo (and other shareholders alongside them) were powerless to do anything. They had no legal recourse. Yahoo owned 43% of the Alibaba VIE (Fake Alibaba), so it did not technically own any portion of Alipay at all. What Yahoo legally owned was 43% of a shell corporation listed in the Cayman Islands that had some (unfortunately illegal) contracts with Alibaba. And when it came time to enforce those contracts. they were unsurprisingly unenforceable. Let us be very clear about exactly what happened: Jack Ma took a company worth billions of dollars directly from under the nose of thousands of US and European inves
... keep reading on reddit β‘It really does, I swear!
For context I'm a Refuse Driver (Garbage man) & today I was on food waste. After I'd tipped I was checking the wagon for any defects when I spotted a lone pea balanced on the lifts.
I said "hey look, an escaPEA"
No one near me but it didn't half make me laugh for a good hour or so!
Edit: I can't believe how much this has blown up. Thank you everyone I've had a blast reading through the replies π
This is the sixty fourth in my series of neoliberal ranking sitting senators. Any senators with a "P" next to their name denotes the potential of their senatorship (how well people *think* he/she will do). Like always the list of ratings is below:
I'm surprised it hasn't decade.
Theyβre on standbi
Buenosdillas
Pilot on me!!
It happened early one April morning, 20 years ago--a day that began breezy and cool, much like today.
A University of Georgia student, on the brink of graduation and a promising advertising career, was robbed, sexually assaulted and strangled in her downtown Athens house, two blocks from campus.
In 1992, downtown Athens was transitioning from a sleepy retail center to a bustling residential and entertainment district. The crack trade still thrived at night in some Athens side streets, but it was possible by day to window shop along downtown's tree-lined main streets and have no idea of any illicit activity on the district's fringes.
In 1985, a couple had restored the old Presbyterian manse at Clayton and Hull streets, as well as a small house tucked behind it where servants had lived. By 1992, the couple had moved on and the house contained offices. Jenny Stone rented the little house.
Nighttime foot traffic was primarily on Clayton, people walking to restaurants and bars further east, to the on Washington or to the B and L Warehouse on the other end of downtown. The occasional traveler moved in and out of the bus station next door to the manse. The nearby popular wasn't yet open.
The night that Jenny Stone was murdered, one of the first things the responding police noticed was that the killer had been hasty. The young woman's shirt and bra were left pushed up on her chest, her shorts on the floor at the end of the bed where she was found lying. Blood was under her fingernails, apparently from fighting to get the killer's hands off her neck. Her nose and mouth were bleeding.
Retired Lt. WJ Smith remembers every detail. He was the lead investigator on the case.
"There was a plastic shoe stacker, a fireplace here, clothes on the floor," Smith said, sketching a layout of the scene. "There were dirty clothes here. She had cats, as I recall. Something had been knocked over. It was pretty cluttered. She had a bicycle, a sofa along here, a table."
Using orange powder and an alternate light source technique then in use, police found a smear about midway up the wall where it looked like her face had hit, like she'd gotten into a fight or been punched.
Another horrific detail: Stone's parents first learned about their daughter's murder while watching the Atlanta evening news. When WXIA Channel 11 broadcast Stone's three-room house, crowded with police, on April 23, 1992, Raymond and Joan Stone were watching from their home in the Atlanta suburbs.
Police lo
... keep reading on reddit β‘Dad jokes are supposed to be jokes you can tell a kid and they will understand it and find it funny.
This sub is mostly just NSFW puns now.
If it needs a NSFW tag it's not a dad joke. There should just be a NSFW puns subreddit for that.
Edit* I'm not replying any longer and turning off notifications but to all those that say "no one cares", there sure are a lot of you arguing about it. Maybe I'm wrong but you people don't need to be rude about it. If you really don't care, don't comment.
When I got home, they were still there.
Do your worst!
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.