Hi everyone!
I am learning Regex and I have a couple of quick questions.
1) How can I condition my replacement depending on what was captured in the 2nd capturing group (men|women) below?
(clothing|products) for (men|women)
For example, how to swap men for boys and women for girls?
I know there is an expression that is something like (?(if)then|else), which I never used before, but how can I compare the contents of group "\2" in the if part? Is there a "equals" operator?
and another:
2) How can I replace an earlier part of an expression ONLY if a later part was also replaced? For example:
For example:
>(a)? ((really)?|(big)?|(old)?|(green)?|(antique)?|(car)?))?( that)?( rest of sentence)?
any word in the first part of the part of the sentence can be removed without affecting the general meaning. How can I replace the "a" at the beginning of the sentence ONLY if something was replaced afterward so that a single "a" is never replaced but every single other part is replaced if it appears by itself?
How can I accomplish this in one single expression?
Thank you very much!
So if I understand this correctly the RAW here is that you can keep scoring these tac ops indefinitely. Wouldn't this clause make these tac ops significantly better that most other tac ops?
So theoretically "hold the line" and "central control" could net you 8 VPs together? Is there something I've missed?
It may have a simple solution that Iβm just overlooking, but Iβve found no resources with a similar request and figured Iβd check here to see if itβs even possible. Is it in fact doable to have the filter settings from the target page of a drill through cascade across other pages and have the same filter settings? My first idea was perhaps synced slicers but that doesnβt seem to be behaving quite right.
I heard that working conditions were really bad during the time in history, which led to the Haymarket Affair and the subsequent formation of Labor Day.
But these articles don't talk about the working conditions in detail.
Can someone explain in comprehensive yet brief detail how the working condition was at that time? For instance, how long were the hours, the breaks, the work intensity, the subjugation etc?
Also, does it mean that in previous decades and centuries before the Industrial revolution the working conditions were better?
I understand that a Defeasible Fee Simple Determinable (DFSD) is durational ("until", "as long as", "while", "during") whereas a Defeasible Fee Simple Subject to a Condition Subsequent (DFSSCS) is conditional ("but if", "so long as", "conditioned upon", "provided that") but I still have some trouble conceptualizing the difference.
How about it conceptualizing:
DFSD as having a condition subsequent on the right of possession (because it automatically ends at the time the condition is met); and
DFSSCS as having a condition precedent on the grantor's Right of Entry.
The thing is, a condition subsequent is an occurrence that extinguishes a right or duty. In the case of a DFSSCS, nothing happens when the condition subsequent is met, whereas with a DFSD, the right to possession automatically terminates when a condition subsequent is met. So, for a DFSSCS, does it not make more sense to think of it like a condition precedent to the Right of Entry, which is then a condition subsequent to the right of possession?
Example: O gives Blackacre to A unless aliens land
My friend and I are in an argument about it.
For fee simple determinable, I have that the fee simple lasts as long as a certain condition is met and once it is not met, it goes back to the grantor's estate. For fee simple subject to condition subsequent, I have that the fee simple lasts until a certain, named event occurs. Am I off?
To me, the two seem the same. For instance, if a hypo says "John conveys to Tim, but if Bill graduates from medical school, then to Bill." You could argue that its a fee simple determinable because as long as the condition of Bill not having graduated from med school is met, it is Tim's. But it could definitelt also be a fee simple subject to condition subsequent because the certain, named event that must occur is Bill's med school graduation. Do you just argue both on an exam?
This probably is wishful thinking, but I'm wondering if there's a way I can automate a conditional series of orders to help me more effectively scalp a stock. Let me provide an example below:
I own 100 shares of Stock X that I wish to continue holding for the long term. The current price is $50.00 and I believe it is going to reverse temporarily, so I would like to attempt to scalp my shares and repurchase at a lower price (let's say hypothetical support at $49.00), capturing the difference as profit. However, if the price action moves immediately against me, I would like to repurchase the shares as quickly as possible to minimize my loss.
Currently, I sometimes attempt to do this manually using the Active Trader tab and it is a stressful experience. I plan and watch the chart as carefully as possible for my sell indicator(s), then place a stop loss limit order just below the current price (or simply click the SELL MKT button at the current price) and then, once it's filled, immediately try to set a limit buy order on the grid at or just above the price that was just filled. If the candles move in my favor, I progressively adjust the buy order lower and lower on the grid along with the price action and all is well. However, if the candles move quickly against me, it's a mad scramble to determine if and where I should buy back in and at how much of a loss. Hope that makes sense.
Is there a better way to go about this? Going back to my initial question, in my dream scenario, I could set a sell order somehow using ToS that, upon filling, would also immediately place a limit buy order at a predetermined increment of price higher to serve as a stop loss for the scalp. This would remove some of the inherent risk in both user error and the amount of time it takes me to manually set this myself. Those one minute candles can move very quickly on a volatile stock and automating this would be tremendously helpful.
Feedback would be greatly appreciated! Thank you so much for your time and patience.
I am trying to create a checklist of up coming tasks. Each task has a due date and a checkbox in the two rows below it. I want the column to be highlighted in red if the task is past due (if due date is before today's date). However, if the box is checked (and thus completed) I don't it to turn red. See link below.
Another smaller issue is that the conditional formatting is only changing a specific cell, rather than the entire section of the column I was hoping it would change.
Here is a link that will show you what I am referring to.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Hi everyone!
I am learning Regex and I have a couple of quick questions.
1) How can I condition my replacement depending on what was captured in the 2nd capturing group (men|women) below?
(clothing|products) for (men|women)
For example, how to swap men for boys and women for girls?
I know there is an expression that is something like (?(if)then|else), which I never used before, but how can I compare the contents of group "\2" in the if part? Is there a "equals" operator?
and another:
2) How can I replace an earlier part of an expression ONLY if a later part was also replaced? For example:
For example:
>(a)? ((really)?|(big)?|(old)?|(green)?|(antique)?|(car)?))?( that)?( rest of sentence)?
any word in the first part of the part of the sentence can be removed without affecting the general meaning. How can I replace the "a" at the beginning of the sentence ONLY if something was replaced afterward so that a single "a" is never replaced but every single other part is replaced if it appears by itself?
How can I accomplish this in one single expression?
Thank you very much!
