I have red the Bullet Journal Method. And I think I have a little understanding on how it works. But, the first problem I have is. I now know how to use the Daily Log and I begin to use it quite frequently. But I'm not sure on how to use the Future and Monthly log. Since I nearly don't have any appointments or things a month or more ahead to write down. And I'm also really bad with planning ahead longer then just a day.
I need help in these aspects, because I think these are two things that prevent me to actually use my Journal on a daily basis.
The mind is a weird thing... it can convince us of all sorts. It can blow stuff way out of proportion or can minimise things that shouldn't be. Nothing quite anchors our thoughts and feelings like written down words. It is a great way of pinning down a concept.
SO...
When we are keeping an eye out for a HVM, we can sometimes be vulnerable. A few of you ladies have been saying you go in looking for a HVM, but come out with an aight LVM in a panic. Miss Incubator has the answer! Write down a physical list of your must haves, the things you cannot budge on -- this can be anything from certain personality traits to living situation to not wanting/wanting kids to earning brackets. It's up to you because it's YOUR standard, but it must be MUST HAVES... things if he lacked, you know deep down it's not a relationship for you. I'd honestly give yourself half a week to compile it. More and more things will come to mind.
AND THEN...
If you meet a guy, go through your standards list. If he does not tick every single box, you say byebye without thought. No mulling it over, no 'giving him a chance' to become MAYBE what you want. He's not the one for you, move on. Say thanks, but I don't think we'd be suitable for each other. You aren't saying he's an awful human being and deserves no love ever, he's just not for you (AND THAT'S OKAY). You don't owe him your partnership (does anyone else hear scrote-screaming rn? 🤔 🤨).
The standards-list keeps you resilient and on track. If you give yourself too much time to think over a guy where you're sitting on the fence, you might find yourself slipping and bargaining because you're so desperately wanting him to be a good one for you. The list removes all of this and maximises your emotional resources and time for meeting a HVM suitable for you.
You're stronger than you think, queens x
p.s remember, a shitty relationship is not better than being alone. Don't settle for less than you know you can be happy with.
It’s indicative of how Sengun has been instant offense for the Rockets and how good his passing is not even 20 games into his career. He’s definitely been better than even I thought he’d be this early on. It’s one of the main reasons we preach that he plays more, because he’s one of the few on the team that can make us look watchable.
What's up?
- wanting to know if RES can block subreddits from homepage or r/all without logging in?
Where does it happen?
- it doesn't happen, so I'm asking if it can
Screenshots or mock-ups
- Imagine not being logged in and you can block a subreddit from appearing.
What browser extensions are installed?
- Night mode: false
- RES Version: 5.22.5
- Browser: Firefox
- Browser Version: 96
- Cookies Enabled: true
- Reddit beta: false
Hi after updateing my docker install of Nextcloud I get the following error (when for example doing an occ filescan):
Exception during scan: An exception occurred while executing a query: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 4047 InnoDB refuses to write tables with ROW_FORMAT=COMPRESSED or KEY_BLOCK_SIZE.
Any ideas what I need to fix?
I am running MariaDB and Nextcloud 21.0.2.1
Thanks in advance!
Hi everyone! I have read through every reply on my post from the other day and appreciate all your input. The overwhelming answer seems to be to go ahead with clear and detailed trigger warnings.
At the moment I’m planning 4-5 posts. These are specifically going to be outlining several serious crimes that were bad enough to be in the news and, in a few cases, commented on by Gothard himself. While IBLP was never the sole cause in these instances and thus managed to avoid any liability, I would argue that they were a contributing factor.
Anything I post in this series will be done with the following protocols:
-
Post under the new flair “WARNING: IBLP Horror Story” (thank you u/Elvis_Take_The_Wheel for the suggestion and mods for setting it up)
-
Add specific detailed trigger warnings in each title, and use clear titles with no clickbaiting
-
Post each post as a photo post marked NSFW so it can be blurred. Stories will be in the comments. If you don’t have NSFW showing as blurred in your settings and want to follow along without seeing things right away, I’d suggest going in and changing that setting.
If you don’t want to see any of this content at all/just prefer just the lighter and funnier stuff in the sub (which I completely respect), you can either:
- Filter the flair category out. Instructions for doing so can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/modhelp/comments/czx9so/filtering_by_flair_a_guide_for_desktop_old_and/ Unfortunately if you’re using the mobile app like I am, this isn't possible
or:
- Block me. If you can’t figure out how to do the above and are really bothered by it, or if you would rather not see IBLP related stuff here, please block me. (This is not a hissy fit; it’s literally the only way I can think of to exclude my posts from your feed.) You’re not going to miss much funny stuff by blocking me because I don't post much of that.
If you still have a problem with things, please downvote or let the mods know and they’ll contact me. I’m not a blogger, YouTuber or podcaster and will never try to monetize this, so I can stop at any point. I do not want to unintentionally add to anyone’s trauma. I believe most of us have already had enough of that in our lifetimes.
A little background on me: I’m former IBLP and ATI, although outside the US, and I spent 10 of my most formative years in the program. I volunteered for them in general growing up and ended up working in their office and other departments for a few years. I w
... keep reading on reddit ➡I wrote an article in which I analyzed how github.com/tidwall/wal is designed; with an eye on calling out what I think are good code reading habits. PTAL! comments and feedback appreciated:
https://www.iantay.dev/post/reviewing-a-write-ahead-log-implementation/
I am trying to block student users from logging in to staff devices. Our entire Intune environment has only been students up to this point so all of our policies and configs have been assigned to device groups. This means that if we create staff policies and configs and assign them to staff devices, then anyone that logs into those devices will have that higher level of permissions.
I tried to do this through Conditional Access and it's not working as I thought it would. When checking AAD sign-in logs, when logging into Windows, the event shows the application is "Windows Sign In", the resource is "Windows Azure Active Directory", and the client app is "Mobile Apps and Desktop clients".
I created a CA with the following config:
- Users and groups: Student group
- Cloud apps or actions: All cloud apps
- Conditions:
- Client Apps: Browser, Mobile apps and desktop clients, Exchange ActiveSync clients, Other clients.
- Filter for devices: device.extensionAttribute1 -eq "Staff Devices"
- Access Controls: Block access
The "What If" test shows successful but there is no "Windows Sign In" in the cloud apps list. I wouldn't expect it to be there since it's not a cloud app but since the condition contains Mobile apps and desktop clients and the sign-in logs show it is that type, I was hoping it would block the sign in. However, the Conditional Access and Report-only tabs only say "Not applicable". At this point, I'm just assuming that CAs aren't evaluated until after the users signs in to the device but I haven't been able to find anything definitive.
Ideally, we recreate all of our policies and configs and have them as user policies but we are short on time and I'm concerned about all the existing devices that might have some of those policies "tattooed" on them. I have seen a few blogs about how to allow only a single user to sign in to the device or how to block certain users from signing in but not anything for blocking groups or only allowing groups. Probably spinning my wheels but maybe someone has a solution for this.
I'm a bit of a fanfiction hobbyist, and I'm trying to give a character a toxic relationship. The character's nickname is Chase, which is what he goes by, and he's a fairly sweet guy, with several older siblings and one younger one. He's never been in a romantic relationship, and he falls hopelessly in love with a girl he met during an undercover job who saved his life.
My goal is for this to be a -to their families- loving relationship, but his older brother, Ren, finds out he's being near-suicidal again (he felt responsible for the person they saw as a sister died, and he started hurting himself; Ren found this out and forced him into therapy) and Chase tells him how mentally and emotionally abusive she is to him. But it takes several months and I want the readers to know how toxic the relationship is, but I don’t know how to make it clear without saying it.
This is Chase's first relationship. He ends up getting a talk about healthy relationships from Ren (who has a wife and two stepchildren), and there's some stalking involved after he breaks up with her. He swears off romance after and is the strange fun uncle who spoils his siblings' kids. He's much happier after he does this, which is a little weird but he was always happier being the brother than the boyfriend to most girls he has any sort of friendship with.
I want to make sure I do this correctly, but I've never had a relationship let alone a toxic one.
Advice, please?
