Gamma Waves 40hz are magic frequency for generation of thoughts. Thoughts, Thought Constructs, Thought Superposition Architechture can help you in astral travels, setting up binds and spells help also. Listen to 40hz frequencies from sites like: https://isochronic.io/ https://www.szynalski.com/tone-generator/ http://onlinetonegenerator.com/ and focus on imbueing the sound with thoughts tied to it. The more you macro/bind/spell for Astral the better and more organized you and the astral beings that help you can be.
I know that a typical form of this question has been asked and "settled" a zillion times before... however... forgive me for my persistent scepticism and frustration, but I have yet to encounter an answer that factors in the possibility of establishing a base vibration in the same way radio waves are expressed in a carrier frequency (like, say, 300 MHz). And overlayed on this carrier frequency is the much slower voice/sound frequency that manifests as sound. (Radio carrier frequencies are fixed, and adjusted for volume to reflect sound vibrations, but subatomic particle oscillations, I figure, would have to be varied by adjusting frequencies and bunched/spaced in order to reflect sound frequencies)
So if you constantly "vibrate" the subatomic particle's states at one location at an extremely fast rate, one that statistically should manifest in an identical pattern in the other particle at the other side of the galaxy, then you can overlay the pattern with the much slower sound frequencies. And therefore transmit sound instantaneously. Sound transmission will result in a variation from the very rapid base rate, and you can thus tell that you have received a message.
A one-for-one exchange won't work, for all the reasons that I've encountered a zillion times before. Eg, you put a red ball and a blue ball into separate boxes, pull out a red ball, then you know you have a blue ball in the other box. That's not communication. BUT if you do this extremely rapidly over a zillion cycles, then you know that the base outcome will always follow a statistically predictable carrier frequency, and so when you receive a variation from this base rate, you know that you have received an item of information... to the extent that you can transmit sound over the carrier oscillations.
Thanks
The concept of superposition always intrigued and bothered me at the same time. I wonder if possibly the reason for this phenomenon being seen is not so much that quantum particles exist in two states simultaneously, but rather that they are constantly oscillating between two states and when observed they would only display one, simply because that was the state they were in at that time.
Now I'm not claiming to be any sort of expert in quantum mechanics. Just someone who is intrigued by it.
My quantum classes have been pretty straightforward and comprehensible. We had some crazy problem sets but in general I thought of it as more cutting-edge / difficult physics. My mechanics class this semester (based on Taylor's Classical Mechanics) is teaching me a new respect for the domain of classical physics. We've had two problem sets this past week that have been like sodomy by a horse. It's taught me that the more contrived world of quantum physics is all fun and games compared to a crazy spring oscillation system that needs to be solved by hand. However, I enjoy the more tangible aspects of classical physics - the problem sets are hard, but I at least understand what is going on. Comprehending spin and eigenvalues as they pertain to the physical world still give me headaches.
This question is based on two science videos on YouTube, one from PBS Space Time and the other from Kurzgesagt. The two of them treat the idea of quantum fields.
In the video from PBS, it was said (in my own words, probably awfully explained, please bear with me) that fields oscillate, with a minimum oscillation as a baseline for all other oscillations, that are all products of that minimum oscillation : for exemple the "manifestation" of the minimum oscillation in the electromagnetic field is a photon. In the Kurzgesagt video, the idea of vacuum state was explained as the lowest energy a field could have, so are vacuum state and minimum oscillation of a field the same thing or are they completely different ?
As a follow-up question, is the higgs boson the "manifestation" of the (current) minimum oscillation of the Higgs field ? It was explained that the Higgs field as we know it has not yet reached vacuum state. Would that mean that there is an oscillation of the field that would be lower than the one "creating" the Higgs boson ? Would that new minimum oscillation create a different particle ?
This is probably a terrible way of saying what I want to ask, but I hope it was clear enough to be understandable... If you have a better way of explaining the phenomenon to me I would love to hear it !
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 76%. (I'm a bot)
> The unit of time, the second, was at one time considered to be the fraction 1/86 400 of the mean solar day.
> We are pleased to present the updated 8th edition of the SI Brochure, which defines and presents the Système International d'Unités, the SI. Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: SI units Chapter 3: Decimal multiples and submultiples of SI units Chapter 4: Units outside the SI Chapter 5: Writing unit symbols and names, and expressing the values of quantities.
> As a consequence, there now exists a general consensus on how unit symbols and names, including prefix symbols and names, as well as quantity symbols should be written and used, and how the values of quantities should be expressed.
> Appendix 1: Decisions of the CGPM and the CIPM. This appendix lists those decisions of the CGPM and the CIPM that bear directly upon definitions of the units of the SI, prefixes defined for use as part of the SI, and conventions for the writing of unit symbols and numbers.
> Appendix 2: Practical realization of the definitions of some important units Appendix 3: Units for photochemical and photobiological quantities.
> An SI base unit, the candela, has been defined for this important photobiological quantity.
Summary Source | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: unit^#1 quantity^#2 radiation^#3 define^#4 definition^#5
Post found in /r/todayilearned.
NOTICE: This thread is for discussing the submission topic. Please do not discuss the concept of the autotldr bot here.
Time-Independent SchrΓΆdinger's Equation: EΟ = -Δ§^(2)/(2m) * Ο'' + k/2 x^(2)* Ο = AΟ''+Bx^(2)Ο
Reordering the terms: Ο'' = (E-Bx^(2))/A * Ο
It's pretty clear this should have solutions for any E no? If it was a finite difference equation it would.
So now we've concluded that the quantum harmonic oscillator is not quantized.
Why isn't this solution valid? If a solution has the "wrong" energy what can we say about it? Does that imply it will not go to zero at infinity?
I apologize for the lack of latex right now.
I can't seem to find this anywhere, and this textbook is pretty intense. Does anyone know where to find the solution manual, even if I need to pay? Thanks!
