A list of puns related to "Moonraker (film)"
Iβm doing yet another Bond rewatch, this time with the Blu Rays, and as silly as Moonraker can be, Iβm constantly struck by just how beautifully shot it is. The Rio scenes alone are breathtaking, and the space effects have held up relatively well.
Dunno if itβs an unpopular opinion or not, but visually itβs one of my favorites.
Octopussy (1983) vs Live and Let Die (1973)
The World Is Not Enough (1999) vs Spectre (2015)
A View to a Kill (1985) vs Dr No (1962)
Never Say Never Again (1983) vs On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
Die Another Day (2002) vs Quantum of Solace (2008)
Thunderball (1965) vs You Only Live Twice (1967)
Goldfinger (1964) vs From Russia With Love (1963)
For Your Eyes Only (1981) vs Tomorrow Never Dies (1997)
The Man With the Golden Gun (1974) vs GoldenEye (1995)
The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) vs Licence to Kill (1989)
Moonraker (1979) vs No Time to Die (2021)
Skyfall (2012) vs The Living Daylights (1987)
Casino Royale (2006) vs Diamonds Are Forever (1971)
For context, Connery/Craig followed by Dalton and then Brosnan is my actor ranking. There's something about Moore's winking approach that doesn't work for me in his more grounded films but fits perfectly as the films get bigger. Does anyone else feel this way?
In a plot stolen right out of modern day, a billionaire launches his own space programme to international acclaim.
Its revealed that he plans to make a society of 'perfect' astronauts on his hidden space station and wipe out humanity using nerve gas.
His plan is foiled when the US are revealed to have a literal Space Force of marines who destroy the space station.
It's a really underrated Bond film, let down only by the space laser battle at the end. Yeah for some reason they decided that a US space army would literally be marines in space suits with laser guns.
Arguably the two most silly and ridiculous Bond films of the Moore era go up against each other, but which do you think is the better film? My vote goes to Octopussy, what do you say, fellow Bond fans? Interested to hear your thoughts!
As I understand it, the filmmakers co-operated with NASA - which is why the "Moonraker shuttles" look just like the real thing - and had originally planned for the film to coincide with the real launch, only for it to get delayed working out the kinks.
So, would your average British or American moviegoer in 1979 be familiar with the concept of the Space Shuttle, or was it more something you would need to be following "space news" to have heard about?
Moonraker, which sees Bond fighting a space faring billionaire intent on committing global genocide, long held a place as one of, if not the most, ridiculous Bond stories. Well now we really do have space faring billionaires - even one who builds and operates rockets on behalf of NASA, similar to how Drax made his fortune in the film. Yeah, youβre never hiding that giant space station from anyone, but I feel as though the film has been given a little credibility bump.
Which other films make for a different viewing experience as time has gone on, whether it be conspiracy theories that turned out to be right, future technology which is now a reality or maybe an actor whoβs real life activities changes how a role comes across etc?
It's got a very tight plot with lots of great action sequences - from the theft of the Shuttle at the start, the Kendo/Karate fight in Venice, the cable-car fight with Jaws, the boat chase in the Amazon, and the climactic fight in space.
Holly Goodhead is also an excellent Bond girl who is actually useful to the plot (can fly the Space Shuttle) and it has the best ending line of any Bond film:
>Bernard Gray: My God! What's Bond doing?!
>Q: I think he's attempting re-entry, sir.
The only thing that could have improved Moonraker is Sheriff Jay Dubya Peppah.
Anyone else agree Moonraker is top 5?
I just wanted to know what you guys would think about the bonkers moonraker being funnier in an Austin powers film as it really feels like a parody of bond
Easily the most ludicrous Bond film, Moonraker was inspired by the public's love of space adventures and sci-fi that followed other projects like Star Wars and Star Trek. Though hugely successful, it is looked back on today with a more critical eye, widely regarded as excessive and silly. However, this sub does seem to have a soft spot for it, if for no other reason than Michael Lonsdale's Drax and his tendency to say things like "cucumber sandwich" and "unloved season". So, what do you guys think? Does Moonraker stand up well against these other big films released in 1979, or does it do a giant face plant on top of a circus tent after falling out of an airplane? You be the judge!
Overview
After a movie like The Spy Who Loved Me, you don't go smaller, you go bigger. And, after the unforeseen success of Star Wars in 1977, space was huge. So, the producers decided that James Bond should explore that final frontier. Today it's rightly regarded as one of the most ludicrous entries in the Bond canon, but it was a smash hit at the box office, and the highest-grossing Bond film at the time (an honor that it retained until 1995's GoldenEye).
Point-By-Point
Iβve seen it jokingly suggested that theyβll go to space in the next movie and even the F&F people are like βyeah that could happenβ
Everyone says itβs ridiculous, but the only franchise I can compare F&F to anymore is the James Bond series (level of suspension of disbelief, action and series longevity) and they went to space on their 11th film, and that was in 1979.
I look forward to the following things happening:
And finally when they get out of the cars, Vin Diesel gets out first and says
THATβS ONE SMALL STEP FOR MAN, ONE GIANT LEAP FOR FAMBLY
===========================
Edit. Didnβt expect this to blow up this big, but always glad to see some F&F love in /r/movies
Hereβs your second dose of corona fueled nonsense
My biggest hope for F9 is that they get rid of Scott Eastwood, I donβt want him killed off or a send off just Kurt Russell being like βkid got transferredβ and we all forget he ever existed because his character is the worst.
Who I WANT to join the franchise is Dylan OβBrien. Dylan been building a solid resume and has done his share of motorcycle (too soon?) and gun scenes. I think he could be a good addition to the family and some young blood to the franchise.
How will they add a new character?
They donβt. Because he was there the whole time, we go back in the franchise and pick literally ANY FUCKING KID that Vin Diesel helped out or handed a soda to and retcon Dylan into the kid. Then we have Dylan be a young car genius working for Cypher and you know when Vin Diesel sees him heβll recognize him because Dominic Toretto never forgets a nino! Sad backstory about Dylan losing his family and Vin Diesel tries to bring him in out of guilt, but Dylan rejects it and goes back to cypher
END OF ACT TWO IN SPACE
Vin Diesel has gone out of the space station without a suit to stop a meteor from heading to earth (because earth is his fambly now too), but is left stranded without a
... keep reading on reddit β‘Now I need to stop talking bad about it because I actually really like it. Think this is actually the first time I watched every second of it, and Iβm actually really impressed. The plot is really good, Bond is good in this one, he almost seems to have a little bit of a dark tone in parts of it. Holly Goodhead is a really good character, Drax is really cool, Jaws finding love is a little strange, but Iβm happy for him. Going into this movie I thought the space scenes were going to be really bad. However, they, especially for 1979, look pretty dang good. It made me keep thinking how on earth they did it with no CGI. It would have been amazing to see how they filmed those scenes. Even the whole space part of the plot was good. Overall itβs pretty good and Iβm actually really impressed. Whatβs yβallβs thought on Moonraker?
It really isn't my favourite Bond film at all. I just find it a very strange thing for James Bond to do, and that kind of seemed to a overrule a lot of other things in the film. It just didn't impress me really.
I really love Ian Flemingβs Moonraker while the movie is quite bad overall. Itβs a dumb fun movie, but simply isnβt close to the quality the novel was.
Weβve seen EON and co. reimagine Blofeld in Spectre (though it wasnβt executed well), and I feel like Drax should be next. The Drax in the novel is a hot-headed genius whoβs out for revenge against London.
I want to see that on screen. They could implement some great action pieces in the third act that will differentiate themselves from the novel, but will still allow the new Bond actor to have a more grounded first and second act akin to Craigβs Casino Royale.
What do you all think?
Edit: Big note, they should give it a new title like Spectre. Bringing back Drax would be great, but I donβt want it to be called Moonraker
Moonraker is a popular ME around these parts (Dolly and her braces), but it's kinda cool that the film includes another movie ME (Casablanca).
After James Bond pushes the Asian guy over balcony into a piano down below, Bond quips, "Play it again Sam"!
Casablanca released in 1942 and Moonraker in 1979.
just wanted to know
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.