YOU CAN ONLY DOWNLOAD IT ON A PC.
Ill do a random pick after Marshall beats up on MTSU tonight
Album cover
Tracklist
- Shook By Your Shaved Head
- Greatest of All Time
- Double Chin For the Win
- Nothing To Say
- Stay Awhile
- Himalaya
- Same Side Sitters
- Like I Never Existed
- More and More
- Do You Want To Settle Down
- The Way You Deserve
- Trophy
- Scarier Than Jason Vorhees At a Campfire
- Birthday Song But Not Really
- Slipping Away
- "Greatest of All Time" will be released February 10, 2020.
Is there any differences between to the 2 pre-order vinyls besides color? Limited Quantity or extras?
Pop punkers! The latest episode of The Moshpit Podcast includes a track by track of NFG’s new album Forever and Ever x Infinity. We’d love for you to take a listen and let us know what you think - Do you agree with the review? Let’s talk about it!
Links to listen: Website
Now, this is a pretty simple question to answer under standard conditions. The infinite limit of any x^n where n > 0 is either infinity or negative infinity, so how could any polynomial be finite?
The thing that got me thinking about this was the Taylor Series of (1/x). This Taylor series, as with any other Taylor series, is a sequence of polynomials. So therefore, logically, taking the limit approaching infinity would result in you adding an infinite number terms that each go to negative infinity or infinity. So how is this equal to 0, as the original function is?
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/483389729904263175/924200741915222056/IMG_1872.png
In addition to this, are there any sequences of polynomials that converge to a finite number other than 0 when you take the limit approaching infinity? If so, what are some examples of these and how would you identify them? Thanks!
I also have tons of other books. Look at the link for full listing, prices and photos.
Shipping is $6 for 1 omnibus, $10 for 2 omnibus, 3+ omnibus is $14
Shipping is $4 for 1-3 TPB, $6 for 4-6 TPB, $8 for 7-10 TPB, $10 for 11-16 TPB, $12 for 17+ TPB
Books are in mint new condition unless listed otherwise. I pack securely in a large box, book wrapped first and entirely surrounded in packing material.
https://imgur.com/a/BOvOD4l http://imgur.com/a/RBA9L6t
Minolta CLE + Rokkor 40mm F2 Lens
- All functions on camera are working correctly
- Some fogging in the viewfinder, but not very noticeable when looking through it
- Some dust inside lens and focus ring is kind of sensitive and moves easily
- $1250 Shipped
~~Fujifilm X-Pro3 (Black)
- Excellent physical condition and everything is working properly
- Shutter count should be under 2k. I'll get exact number upon request
- Comes with Fuji batteries and charger
- $1500 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~Fujifilm 23mm F1.4 Lens
- Glass is in excellent condition, and body is in very good condition
- Comes with caps, box and hood
- $550 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~Fujifilm 35mm F1.4 Lens
- Glass is in excellent condition, but body has some dings and scratches
- Comes with hood and caps
- $375 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~Voigtlander Nokton 40mm F1.4 MC
- Excellent condition
- Comes with box and caps
- $350 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~Olympus Infinity Stylus (MJU-1)
- Everything is functioning properly
- Comes with strap and olympus bag
- $150 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~Nikon One Touch 100 Point and Shoot Camera
- Everything functioning correctly
- Plastic cover over flash/focus is missing, but doesn't affect usage
- $20 Shipped~~ SOLD
~~2x Velvia 50 35mm Film
- New and in box
- Expires August 2022
- $35 Shipped~~ SOLD
Pictures and timestamp: https://imgur.com/a/tqYD6qJ
Let me know if you have any questions!
The problem: https://imgur.com/uVCjff6
My work: https://imgur.com/9a5T6Tx (answers are in meters)
This is a tricky one to explain. I got the correct answers eventually by using the work shown above, but I had to flip some signs.
The work on the left was supposed to be for positive X axis. For q1 and q2 I used positive numbers in the final formula both times. This is because when I set the two potentials equal to each other, one had a positive charge and the other had a negative charge. Therefor, when I moved the negative charge to the other side of the equation, the value mathematically became positive. However, I did something wrong here and I'm not sure what. The value I was supposed to wind up with was ~.065. I can get .065 by simply using -16 for q2, but I don't understand why I have to do that.
The work on the right is for the negative X axis. Same exact reasoning as above, all charge values are positive in the final equation. This one is correct without me having to change any signs. What gives?
Edit: Upon further inspection, I realize that because r is negative in the second part of the problem, the actual equation I need to use to find the answer is the equation on the left (which gives me the correct sign as well). But wouldn't this just mean that the first and second parts are solved with the same equation? "r2" should be (r - d) in both cases, no?
