The book exists, but no intact copy of the original 1924 film had survived until someone found an intact copy at a flea market in Paris. The film will be restored and presented & screened in theaters & at film festivals - this will be interesting to see how it is received.
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-city-without-jews-release
The catch? The Soviets must capture Berlin in a month and before that the Germans have a full year to prepare and build up massive fortifications along the German-Soviet border (located where it was before Barbarossa). Bonus points if they can capture all of the Reich's territory east of France.
And of course, no nukes.
Did they believe this "ethnic cleansing" would prevent another war, or was it an attempt to appease Soviet interests?
Did most support it? Did any consider it an atrocity?
^- ^WW2 ^Tweets ^from ^1941 ^(@RealTimeWWII) ^| ^August ^24, ^2019
Iβve had a look online and the answer appears to generally be βnoβ, but there is a foul where the penalty could be forfeiting the game (see below), so the scale goes from relatively innocuous penalty (ie small set yardages) to bigger yardage penalties then to losing the game (as a result of a βpalpably unfair actβ) with not much in between.
Though saying that, I believe the βpalpably unfair actβ isnβt a set penalty, the officials *could decide whatever they see fit as the punishment.
)