With the war affecting our regional economies so much, Chile once again turns to our eastern neighbor in order to find a way to deal with these troubling times.
Therefore Renaldo Azevedo has decided to pay a visit to Buenos Aires in order to discuss an economic union with Argentina, thus giving the Argentines better access to our Pacific markets in the IOU.
We believe that if this proposal is accepted by mutual parties there will be talks of further integration later on down the line.
On the other hand, every goverment in the world hold Gold, so they will do anything possible for Gold rise in value. Since they hold no silver, why would they care about it? Why would silver go up in value ? Plus more than 50% of its demand is industrial. In economic and monetary collapse there will be no demand for silver. How can silver be good hedge in this times? I understand its still better than holding fiat or stocks etc. But why should i buy silver over Gold because facts i just said. Gold seems much more safe for me, because thats the only and biggest insurance of every goverment and central bank in the world, they will do anything for Gold value to go up, they buy all the Gold right now, not silver, but Gold. If they hold no silver, why would they even care about it. Im just afraid that in economic or monetary collapse, absolutely every asset will go down in value except Gold which will be the only asset that will go up because goverment will have it and they will promote it and every people will blindly listen to them. I just think Gold is a much safer and better bet than silver because of this..
>Progress must happen on four fronts: first, towards a genuine
>Economic Union that ensures each economy has the structural features to prosper within the Monetary Union. Second, towards a
>Financial Union that guarantees the integrity of our currency across the Monetary Union and increases risk-sharing with the private sector. This means completing the Banking Union and accelerating the Capital Markets Union. Third, towards a
>Fiscal Union that delivers both fiscal sustainability and fiscal stabilisation. And finally, towards a
>Political Union that provides the foundation for all of the above through genuine democratic accountability, legitimacy and institutional strengthening.
Econ major here looking to take an econ elective next semester. I have the option of taking American Economic History with Professor Rockoff. There is a another class offered, Financial and Monetary History of the US, which I qualify for right now because I haven't finished my core econ classes yet.
Would it make sense for me to take both classes, Amer Econ History now, and then Fin and Mon History later on? Or is there a lot of overlap between the classes, and I should just stick with one?
I'm interested in the Federal Reserve, and want to learn more about it. Took Money, Banking, and Finance in the fall and was looking for a course that could almost be a continuation of it.
Any help would be great!
