Civil Procedure Rules Puns

hey guys, just looking for clarification on this rule. Rule 15.02 of the rules of civil procedure in Ontario.

my questions are;

a) is this just a normal request that can be done via e-mail? Or should I make a more formal request?

b) what would the title of this letter be? a request for notice of lawyer?

Thank you for your time and help.

The rule is copy pasted below;

Notice of Authority to Commence Proceeding

Request for Notice by Lawyer

15.02 (1) A person who is served with an originating process may deliver a request that the lawyer who is named in the originating process as the lawyer for the plaintiff or applicant deliver a notice declaring whether he or she commenced or authorized the commencement of the proceeding or whether his or her client authorized the commencement of the proceeding. O. Reg. 427/01, s. 9; O. Reg. 575/07, s. 1.

The One Rule.

The Court must not. However, the Court may. And the Court damn well might. It probably will.

Is it 2019 Amendments to the Rules on Civil Procedure or 2020 Rules on Civil Procedure?

This may sound quite dumb but I just need 100% certainty.

Thank you so much!

UPDATE: I finally had the courage to reach out to Atty. Manny Riguera for my concern, and here's what he said:

https://preview.redd.it/mvadr3x6bd171.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=e80bb47cd945b225d8de404998b443efd658cf0b

Hope this helps!

Good day mga Kuya and Ate,

Any recommendation for Civ Pro, Evidence, and Crim Pro? (No Reviewers please)

Btw, has anyone read or tried the book of Fiscal Salazar Fundamentals of Civil Procedure? How was it po?
I'm currently using Tranquil Salvador's Crim Pro, it is comprehensive plus the flow charts presented were AWESOME.

With Evidence, I have Riano but considering the amended rules I think it won't suffice. :(

Thank you for your response. God bless and Stay safe.

How to waste two years and only release a tier0 lawsuit. A CIG and Crytek story. Lol

https://docdro.id/MjI2SL9

In accordance with this Court’s Order (ECF No. 124) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),Plaintiff CRYTEK GMBHand Defendants CLOUD IMPERIUM GAMES CORP. and ROBERTS SPACE INDUSTRIES CORP.,by and through their counsel of record, jointly stipulate as follows:

(1)The dismissal with prejudice of this Action; and

(2)Each party is to bear its own respective attorneys’ fees and costs.

I started a money claim through the online process a few weeks ago. This is in the jurisdiction of an English county court. At the 2 week response deadline, the defendant filed acknowledgement of service to receive a further 2 weeks to prepare a defence.

Today, 24hrs before that deadline, they have asked me to agree to a further 7 day extension as they need more time to prepare the defence. This would be under Civil Procedure Rules 15.5, taking them to 5 weeks to prepare a defence for what (perhaps naively) seems to me a relatively simple matter. They have not given any explanation besides that they are still investigating the claim.

The time itself is not a concern to me, as it sounds like given current backlogs it may be months-to-years before a trial date if the matter does proceed that far at all. My main concern is acting in good faith and ideally settling amicably before a trial, and on that basis I am minded to agree.

However, the defendant had a tendency of stalling and delaying on this matter even before the court process started and I would not want to entertain a delay just for the sake of it, which if I were a cynical person is what I would believe this to be.

What should I be aware of that I don't know?

https://www.docdroid.net/MjI2SL9/govuscourtscacd6964371260.pdf

Most importantly: 1: The dismissal with prejudice of this Action 2: Each party is to bear its own respective attorneys’ fees and costs.

Narrative switch ongoing and superdefensive post being made, as to why there predictions "so called facts" did not come to pass. This is finally indeed the end.....of this lawsuit for CiG. LOL Free comedy on the Clown sub to laugh at and pure self humiliation is ongoing.

1L here, especially in contracts and civ pro, it feels like my professors toss around provisions of the code and procedures like nothing, and can rattle the language off of the top of their heads. I see them in the text and footnotes of the cases and feel so confused trying to reference them/see how they fit in. It just feels like I’ll never get a grasp on them, and I’m terrified they’re gonna define finals and things

If hindi pa kayo member, please dm me your email-add, I'll give you an invite. Stay safe future Attys. :)

So if you receive a counter claim and in the general allegations they site recklessness but then for Counts they only site negligence what would be the appropriate response/rule for the answer to the counterclaim to dismiss the counterclaim?

Basically long story short I'm in a fight with a county court that isn't local to me because I tried to issue a claim in their court instead of the one local to me. Their excuse? It should be issued in a county court that is local to me. No reason is given.

I want to make a formal complaint but before doing so, I checked CPR and online, I can't find anything. I am unable to access paywalled legal websites though.

Can anyone else confirm this?

What would be the federal equivalent of Rule 11 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (requesting and/or memorializing in writing an extension to a deadline)?

I can't seem to find a good answer on the internet.

Hey all, as the semester is winding down, I'm beginning to get nervous about my Civ Pro final. The exam is closed book, and our prof. requires us to memorize/note the numbers associated with each Federal Rule of Civil Procedure when referencing them. I'm historically terrible at memorization, and I'm finding the rules particularly difficult b/c there aren't really fun phenomics or whatever to remember that Physical/Mental Exams fall under Rule 35 or whatever. Does anyone have any tips or resources on how to remember which rules relate to what topics?

Anyone know where I can get a good CIV PRO MBE outline? I am about to destroy the monitor. I keep getting Civ Pro MBEs wrong. Other than SMJ, PJ, improper venue, summary judgement, I basically got all other civ pro mbes wrong, especially Erie, appeal and jury. Apparently, my outline got problem.

Hey all,

I'm taking Civ Pro this semester and our professor's syllabus lists the "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure" as a required text. The Barnes & Noble bookstore doesn't have a copy, but her syllabus has required readings such as "FRCP 7, 8(b)-(e), 11, 12."

Anyone know what the best copy of this is? Isn't this publicly available? Hard copies on Amazon are about $8.

Sorry if this is a dumb question. Thank you!

So, I have done questions for every subject (40 ish). But civil procedure is really low. Whereas every other subject is like 55 to 65. Like so far (first 10), like 15%. Can anyone recommend anything? I did really bad on the last exam (only beating 10%).... so with me only failing by 1 point...if I can get this to 50%... I sound in a great position to pass. Right?!

I love some advice on how to improve

Using adapti bar now.

I’ve heard 60% on every subject can lead sons to pass. So I’d be so close if it wasn’t this one subject...

Hello! Any suggestion for a good reference for revised rules on civil procedure? Is bathan's or tan's book a good one?