As a player who uses wings a lot and gets into the box from the wing a lot, it takes a few goals away from me every game. No matter what you do your strikers run forward headlessly and get too close to the keeper instead of waiting for the ball. Any solution?

Also, Wall signed a huge contract, just like any human on earth would. You take that opportunity when it’s given. Doesn’t mean he deserves your hate.

I need help before I completely lose it

It quite often ended with a KO. SA’s were still not easy to get. And there was no dupe system. Oh god, it was an awful and wonderful time.

Now, on new Broly’s battle, his attack all does like 120 damage lol. My how times have changed.

Almost all fighting games have this core rock-paper-scissors relationship that heavily discourages turtling with a block by allowing you to grab opponents who are shielding, but if you get attacked while trying to grab you will lose because the animations are rather slow with a lot of end lag after the effect triggers allowing for easy punishment if you try to block it. Clearly a grab would be a lot of extra work to program and whenever someone does try to grab the other person in a lightsaber duel in one of the movies, it's usually very drawn out where someone usually dies, gets amputated, or nothing happens so it probably wouldn't be the best to bring in a grab specifically. Thankfully, there are alternatives in the world of Star Wars that we can use that can fulfill the same role as a grab and be activated with the melee button that would deal damage and cause players who are blocking to stagger but still lose to a lightsaber or blaster.

Animation Ideas

Light Side Saber Users

• Luke, Rey, and Obi-wan already have kicks as part of their animation set and they're already even recognized as separate from a swing from an attack perspective because it will say that you got killed by someone's kick if that is what killed you as opposed to their lightsaber. I would strongly recommend that the kick animation be pulled out of their regular animation set and transferred to their melee button.
• Yoda could jump on someone's head or otherwise kick someone in the face by jumping a bit higher with his attacks. His probably wouldn't get used all that often because he already has his dash attack that bypasses blocks, but that's fine. I'm not super sold on this animation idea, so if you have a better one I'm all ears.
• Anakin does like to use grabs a lot when he's fighting people, but again that's extra programming. He is also shown to do kicks, so I think he would be fine to use a kick for his animation. He's gonna end up using Passionate Strike most of the time in this situation anyway (which needs to be buffed to have a faster animation and higher damage so it's actually useful)

Dark Side Saber Users

• Kylo gets a punch like he used right before incinerating Finn's spinal cord at the end of their duel in Episode 7
• Dooku could get the stab currently being used during his Duelist animation, and [I would recommend that those animations get removed from Duelist along while providing other buffs to the ability](https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefro

One of the greatest mysteries of the universe. Defender-first players are like my white whale. I know they're out there but...they're also not.

I'd like to throw a thousand of the most gifted scientists on earth at this problem. Or maybe an X-files episode to be dedicated to it.

1. The enemies wake up and attack back (which defeats the whole purpose)

2. They accidentally hit each other

What do ya'll think?

I feel like I only attack down the right and sometimes through the center..... I am going to make an effort to try and vary my attack’s in rivals this week....I’ve always tried to dominate possession so I think that’s one good thing about my play.

I’d like to know what people are thinking about when they are attacking? Do you have a plan or are you making it up as you bring the ball forward? Would like some advice or tips

You are not easily offended by things, it is merely a thought saying you u/ this thought is saying "You are easily offended by things" and you believe it.Now you have a thought saying "I am easily offended by things" while it is only a thought, you now identify with it instead of simply observing it and being aware of being aware of it."Sometimes the feeling is strong" is merely but another thought. It is a thought saying "omg, right now this is too strong to be the observer" but who is observing even this thought?

You are always observing, whether you are aware of it or not. The only thing left to do is to be aware that you are aware at all times.

The thought might be saying "the feeling is strong" but even this thought comes and goes, isn't it?One day the feeling is strong, after a few moments it passes. After a few days again the feeling seems strong.

Is this a reliable source of information for you to identify with?Is this even true in any level? How can a thought be held true? it is only if you identify with the thought and give it your power, that it seems like it is true.

If you merely observe this thought, you realize its true nature as simply a thought, and you can brush it off like it is nothing, because truly it is nothing.

All these thoughts are merely passing clouds that come and go in the infinite sky which you are.

You could metaphor the "strong feeling" as a very dark cloud. It might seem like a "very dark cloud" but truth is it is merely another cloud that comes and goes, and you should not believe it to hold any kind of power. You are the one observing it being "a very dark cloud" or simply "a cloud".

Nothing can be anything without you allowing and identifying with it and giving it your power.

Believe and have faith that you are the awareness being aware of all these coming and going things.

You can always observe these things coming and going so who is the one observing?

Just an interesting thought that came to my mind, but it is fairly important to think about because a 3 v 1 or higher should be won every time if you play it right. If you really want to win don't give the protagonist the chance to clutch up.

From the Position Statement Summer 2019:

> The significant lack of evidence for treatments and interventions which may be offered to people with dysphoria is a major issue facing this area of healthcare. There are also differences in the types and stages of treatment for patients with gender dysphoria depending on their age or stage of life. Gonadorelin (GnRH) analogues are one of the main types of treatment for young people with gender dysphoria. These have long been used to treat young children who start puberty too early, however less is known about their long-term safety in transgender adolescents. [...]

And here are the explanations NHS GPs will use not to prescribe HRT or do blood tests coming from private GICs (GenderGP, GenerCare, London Transgender Clinic, etc.).

In their statement, there are no mentions about private (GIC) providers shared care agreement, despite being a know stopgap for patients with the money to pay for private diagnosis. ... If anybody was wondering why your NHS GP won't do shared care agreement (HRT prescription and blood tests) based on your private GIC diagnosis and treatment plan.

The RCGP position statement also explains why NHS GPs won't follow GMC bridging prescription guidelines to minimise harm.

> [GMC] advice fails to address the ethical and safety issues around prescribing outside the limits of one’s competence, the significant medicolegal implications this carries and the non pharmacological needs of patients as they await access to a specialist.

> Further, the GMC advice above conflicts with their Good Medical Practice ethical guidance which states that GPs must recognise and work within the limits of their competence. As such, GPs face conflicting messages about how to approach advising and prescribing for these patients, which poses a significant risk to GPs in their practice, and patient safety. GPs are ultimately responsible for their prescribing and should not be pressured into prescribing where they feel it is unsafe or involves unacceptable risks. The GMC advice needs review and clarification.

> [...] GPs should not be expected to fill the gaps in commissioned gender identity specialists and clinics. [...] there should no expectation for GPs to advise patients outside the remit of their role as expert generalist,

Edi