Astronaut ranks and positions Puns

Is this normal ? The job said junior level. That problem on the test was definitely senior level. I ended up not being able to do the assessment which sucks. I emailed the recruiter and told him it was way above my level unfortunately and maybe I will re apply when I get more experience. Now I feel like I need to practice more coding before I apply places again so I don't feel like an idiot.

This is what the question was. I could not find the original question. This was someone's solution to the airport gates problem. https://github.com/gaohannk/InterviewCpp/blob/master/fidessa/MinimumGates.cpp

EDIT: I haven't even taken data structures and Algorithms yet in school. I switched my degree a couple months ago from computer technology and security to CS so that's why I'm not as skilled as you might think I should be. I really only started programming a couple months ago. I code every day for hours and I'm not giving up until I get where I want to be.

Also I'm sorry I said it was a senior level problem. The only reason I said that was because I saw this problem somewhere else online and it said it was a senior level problem.

If I were to be completely honest with the way I am, I would probably be junior grade lieutenant working in engineering onboard a starship. I would probably exist during the DS9/Voyager timeline.

I'm usually hard working and dedicated to my job, but I'm also the kind of person that doesn't exactly get used to command unless I'm given quite a few tastes of it.

• For example, who comes up with the plans for invading another country? Who decides how to mobilize and utilize the various branches of the military?
• Obviously, the President is the "Commander In Chief", but they aren't the ones to come up with the strategy and tactics to win a war.

I want to have an idea of how im doing. My translated version often gives me titles like brutal/furious or blank Which title is essentially 1st/2nd/3rd. Theres also warrior and smasher my guess is thats damage and destruction focused. Any clarifications appreciated.

It was out of this world

What I've always been confused by the various works in which clones appear is the clones and their armor attachments, like kamas, pauldrons, and the like.ARC Troopers since their introductions and in continuing Star Wars works are equipped with kamas, pauldrons, and those antenna rangefinders which aside from their armor coloration make them stick out from regular clones and make them stand out as the badass special forces that they are (such as Fordo and the Muunilinst 10 among all the other standard white clones), but then later we see high ranking reg clones donning the same accessories (and being able to easily replicate the look of an ARC even if they themselves aren't) and in some cases we even see the standard clones doning the same amount of accessories as the high ranks (such as the 327th on Felucia) and it's confused me a lot.What I was curious about is what exactly is the Grand Army of the Republic policy on armor attachment customization? I used to think that the clones in higher or special position were the only ones permitted to receive these kinds of attachments but now I'm not really sure.

This doesn't seem to be a canon or legends specific issue and ranges across both timelines and I was wondering if either had an answer for it?

Number one being your favorite and number eight being your least favorite. Here’s mine!

#1 Drive Bar #2 Mobile Bar #3 DTO #4 Cold Bar #5 Warming #6 DTR #7 Register #8 Customer Support

MTG

##Position Battle Performances

###Vocal

###Dance

##Ranks

Seems like there are a ton of differing opinions on this that you can see in various threads. Would like to get a discussion started on this specific topic. Here is my thought:

1. OT: clearly our best player is Lamar. Lamar is a multiplier who makes everyone around him better. With that being said, our tackles have really impacted his play negatively. Additionally, they are given a ton of help with set and chip blockers which limits the offenses ability to spread out teams and utilize space. We also struggle mightily to get much run blocking from our tackles which I think would really help this team. Stanley, James and Mekari all have real injury histories and I’m not comfortable relying on that group solely next year. I believe AV is a definite cut candidate based on his play and cap savings. OT is a premium position that very few can play.

2. Corner: I believe this is a huge need at a very premium position. Corner depth is critical in this passing league. Marcus peters is a cut candidate due to high cap savings and the fact that he is coming off a major knee injury at 29 years old. Humphrey is awesome in slot. Need an additional outside corner.

3. Interior pass rush: losing bwill and Campbell is big. I think we have some guys who can step up, but more is needed.

4. FS: this is important as we generate no turnovers. I am ok with Stone /Stephen’s and I do not think this is a premium position which is why it is here

5. 3rd rb, 3rd TE, MLB, pass rush

Thoughts?

There are two instances in Lower Decks that Shaxs' rank is seen to be Commander. At the end of "Second Contact" and in the briefing room of "Moist Vessel" he is donning three pips that would suggest his rank being higher at different points throughout the series. For the rest of the series he is portrayed as a Lieutenant and Chief of security for the Cerritos. The rank of Lieutenant and position of Chief of security would be significant achievements for any Starfleet officer but it would be especially groundbreaking for a Bajoran. If we are to assume that Shaxs' rank of Commander were at the very least temporary promotions, then his time in Starfleet would be even more significant.

Shaxs' perceived age and ranks could also signify that he was one of, if not the first, Bajoran to join Starfleet. While his age is not given, his rank of Lieutenant would suggest that he had at least a combined 10 years in Starfeet when taking into account 4 years of Academy training, 3 years as ensign and another 3 years minimum of Lt. Jr grade and Lieutenant ranks combined. Data tells Lore in "Datalore" his path to his current rank included the Academy, 3 years as ensign and 10-12 years of rotating ship assignments. While Data's path to Lt. Commander is not set in stone as we see with Commander Riker earning his rank in a shorter period of time, it is safe to assume that Shaxs' lack of assignment to a Flagship vessel would put him on a more average track.

With a minimum of 10 years needed to achieve his current rank and position, and Riker's impressive rise occurring in 11 years from Academy to Commander, Shaxs would have been at the very least entering Starfeet at the same time as Ensign Ro who is the first known Bajoran to join Starfleet. Even if they entered at the same time, Shaxs' accomplishments and longevity would have made a more positive and lasting impression on Starfleet as a whole when compared to Ensign Ro's tenure.

I’d be interested to hear why you prefer using one benchmarking tool over the other.

I’ll primarily be using the tool for doing one-off benchmarking — checking how well sites rank for a list of keywords in a given moment — rather than doing long-term monitoring of how sites’ rankings change over time.

So, getting recommendations that are specific to that type of usage would be especially helpful to me.

why would Yahoo choose to only show overall rank? It’s not particularly useful as QBs, defenses, kickers etc are all mixed in when trying to gauge how a RB, WR and TE has been performing compared to their position group.

The only way I’ve been able to figure this out is go to the player page, filter by position and then sort by season long points and handcounting the ranks manually. Really annoying. Still better than ESPN though

Edit: for those saying “you just want to complain, all you have to do is go to the players page, filter by player and sort by total points scored”, this is what I mean by it’s annoying: https://i.imgur.com/3rWQJMa.png

They still only show overall rank in that view. Which means if I want to see where Robert Woods is in the list, I have to scroll down until I find him and then count the players ahead of him. Yeah, super convenient

How would you rank roles and/or departments in terms of pay to stress to satisfaction to longevity?

Sorry if this is not the right question to be asking but feeling a little stuck right now with my career and wanted some perspective. I know it’s super subjective but wanted to hear some opinions. Kind of mixed feelings about which department to try focus on and while I have slight inclinations to some, nothing so strong that I’m pulled towards it purely based off of passion. Closest would be the camera department but I feel like that ranks low in stress and longevity and hard to break into as a female. And for example, I’ve been presented with opportunities to PA for office, art, accounting, was given a costume supervisor’s email today, so I want to narrow down asap. I’ve only actually experienced being an office PA out of these because of timing.

I value a higher pay, a somewhat steady schedule - though I know that’s hard to come by - but also wouldn’t mind something higher paying with a more hectic schedule if it pays well enough to be able to afford a longer break after. While my passions growing up have always been in cameras, I’m pretty sure I could be just as satisfied working in another department that pays well and just being able to be a part of this industry ultimately.

Thanks in advance from one of the many lost early 20 year olds in this industry

Many from the other poll seemed to think we were in the top three of desirable jobs overall. A new HC is often tied to the QB situation with that team so I wondered where everyone would put the Dolphins compared to the Jags, Broncos, Raiders, Giants, Bears, Vikings.

View Poll

Im just burnt out being a manager the drama. What are some pros and cons about returning to rank and file?

Also Can someone rank most powerful to least powerful? Like for example

1. operator
2. HR
3. general manger
4. Management
5. ... so on so on
6. Crew Member, Drive Thru

Also I noticed on this sub reddit theres no post about people talking/working in the positions of Maintenance, HVAC technician, Guest Experience Leader, Janitors, is Mcdonalds still looking for those positions? What happened to those positions are they stuck in limbo?? Do all crew members just take turns and do one chore or do each do one small chore one by one for Maintenance and Janitor?

(I am new to mcdonalds and have no idea who is most powerful and if theres a problem I would like to know who to call and if they dont do anything I want to know who is above them/ there boss) So i would like to know all the rankings there thank you

Im guessing the new people start of at the bottom and the longer you stay then you get promoted/rise up through the ranks as time goes on and get increase pay? Is there also a difference between Crew member VS Team member?

From USA please. Thank you

Title

MTG

##Position Battle Performances

###Vocal

###Dance

##Ranks