#FT: Doncaster Rovers 0-3 Sunderland
Sunderland scorers: Ross Stewart (7' PEN), Elliot Embleton (41'), Ben Blythe (50' OG)
Venue: Eco-Power Stadium
Auto-refreshing reddit comments link
Doncaster Rovers
Louis Jones, Joseph Olowu, Ben Blythe, Branden Horton, Kyle Knoyle, Matthew Smith, Liam Ravenhill (Dan Gardner), Lirak Hasani (Omar Bogle), Joseph Dodoo (Aidan Barlow), Tommy Rowe, Jordi Hiwula.
Subs: Ed Williams, Bobby Faulkner, Pontus Dahlberg, Tiago Cukur.
^____________________________
Sunderland
Ron-Thorben Hofmann, Tom Flanagan, Callum Doyle, Bailey Wright, Corry Evans (Dennis Cirkin), Daniel Neill, Lynden Gooch, Leon Dajaku, Ross Stewart (William Harris), Elliot Embleton, Alex Pritchard (Denver Hume).
Subs: Ollie Younger, Frederik Alves, Lee Burge, Benjamin Mgunga-Kimpioka.
MATCH EVENTS | via ESPN
7' Goal! Doncaster Rovers 0, Sunderland 1. Ross Stewart (Sunderland) converts the penalty with a right footed shot to the bottom left corner.
41' Goal! Doncaster Rovers 0, Sunderland 2. Elliot Embleton (Sunderland) right footed shot from the centre of the box to the centre of the goal. Assisted by Alex Pritchard following a set piece situation.
45' Substitution, Doncaster Rovers. Omar Bogle replaces Lirak Hasani.
50' Own Goal by Ben Blythe, Doncaster Rovers. Doncaster Rovers 0, Sunderland 3.
57' Substitution, Sunderland. Dennis Cirkin replaces Corry Evans.
61' Substitution, Doncaster Rovers. Dan Gardner replaces Liam Ravenhill.
74' Substitution, Sunderland. Denver Hume replaces Alex Pritchard.
76' Substitution, Doncaster Rovers. Aidan Barlow replaces Joseph Dodoo because of an injury.
83' Dan Gardner (Doncaster Rovers) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
83' Substitution, Sunderland. William Harris replaces Ross Stewart.
88' Callum Doyle (Sunderland) is shown the yellow card.
*^(Don't see a thread for a match you're watching?) [^(Click here)](https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/wiki/matchthrea
... keep reading on reddit ➡Following the declaration by the British government that Queen Elizabeth's Grandson and Successor, William V reportedly "doesn't care about the islands in the Guiano-Indes Federation" and "never intended on visiting them anyway" many Guyanese republicans and others took to the streets, with organized protests across the nation, particularly in Georgetown, various effigies of William V and Canadian Prime Minister Duncan Everhart have been burned. UK flags and the Canadian Red Ensign have been burned in the streets, with some major news companies reporting on "new imperialism at the behest of Canada and their British puppeteers".
This is likely in reference to the illegal occupation and annexation of St. Vincent and the Grenadines by Canadian military personnel and the denial and delay of an internationally-affirmed referendum on the islands.
The GIF and Guyanese local government have yet to comment on the situation. Local police have been monitoring the protests, particularly outside the former Canadian and UK embassies in Georgetown, along with the now closed St. Vincent and Grenadines embassy.
Similar events have been reported throughout the Guiano-Indes Federation, particularly in the Bahamas, Antigua and Jamaica, regions which historically were very pro-British.
In contrast, Suriname has announced a parade celebrating the dutch royal family in preparation for their visit. Some in Suriname have protested outside the parade and called for the visit to be suspended, however this is a very small and vocal minority, with paraders far outnumbering their anti-monarchist counterparts.
I don't want to step on anybody's toes here, but the amount of non-dad jokes here in this subreddit really annoys me. First of all, dad jokes CAN be NSFW, it clearly says so in the sub rules. Secondly, it doesn't automatically make it a dad joke if it's from a conversation between you and your child. Most importantly, the jokes that your CHILDREN tell YOU are not dad jokes. The point of a dad joke is that it's so cheesy only a dad who's trying to be funny would make such a joke. That's it. They are stupid plays on words, lame puns and so on. There has to be a clever pun or wordplay for it to be considered a dad joke.
Again, to all the fellow dads, I apologise if I'm sounding too harsh. But I just needed to get it off my chest.
#FT-Pens: Queens Park Rangers 0-0 Sunderland
Sunderland advance 3-1 on penalties
Venue: Kiyan Prince Foundation Stadium
Auto-refreshing reddit comments link
Queens Park Rangers
Timothy Dieng, Jordy de Wijs, Yoann Barbet, Robert Dickie, Ilias Chair, Luke Amos (Stephen Duke-McKenna), Chris Willock (Andre Dozzell), Moses Odubajo, Osman Kakay (Albert Adomah), Andre Gray (Charlie Austin), Lyndon Dykes.
Subs: Stefan Johansen, Jordan Archer, Dominic Ball, Jimmy Dunne, Aaron Drewe.
^____________________________
Sunderland
Lee Burge, Bailey Wright, Frederik Alves (Callum Doyle), Denver Hume (Dennis Cirkin), Carl Winchester, Luke O'Nien, Corry Evans (Aiden O'Brien), Daniel Neill, Ross Stewart, Leon Dajaku (Alex Pritchard), Lynden Gooch (Aiden McGeady).
Subs: Tom Flanagan, Ron-Thorben Hofmann, Stephen Wearne, William Harris.
MATCH EVENTS | via ESPN
15' Jordy de Wijs (Queens Park Rangers) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
24' Substitution, Sunderland. Dennis Cirkin replaces Denver Hume because of an injury.
39' Lynden Gooch (Sunderland) is shown the yellow card.
62' On: Charlie Austin|Off: Andre Gray
64' Substitution, Sunderland. Aiden McGeady replaces Lynden Gooch.
65' Substitution, Sunderland. Aiden O'Brien replaces Corry Evans.
69' Substitution, Sunderland. Alex Pritchard replaces Leon Dajaku because of an injury.
69' Substitution, Sunderland. Callum Doyle replaces Frederik Alves.
72' On: Albert Adomah|Off: Osman Kakay
73' On: Andre Dozzell|Off: Chris Willock
84' Substitution, Queens Park Rangers. Stephen Duke-McKenna replaces Luke Amos.
90'+4' Ross Stewart (Sunderland) is shown the yellow card for a bad foul.
*^(Don't see a thread for a match you're watching?) ^(Click here) ^(to learn how to request a match thread from this
... keep reading on reddit ➡Do your worst!
I'm surprised it hasn't decade.
For context I'm a Refuse Driver (Garbage man) & today I was on food waste. After I'd tipped I was checking the wagon for any defects when I spotted a lone pea balanced on the lifts.
I said "hey look, an escaPEA"
No one near me but it didn't half make me laugh for a good hour or so!
Edit: I can't believe how much this has blown up. Thank you everyone I've had a blast reading through the replies 😂
It really does, I swear!
Because she wanted to see the task manager.
Heard they've been doing some shady business.
They’re on standbi
but then I remembered it was ground this morning.
Edit: Thank you guys for the awards, they're much nicer than the cardboard sleeve I've been using and reassures me that my jokes aren't stale
Edit 2: I have already been made aware that Men In Black 3 has told a version of this joke before. If the joke is not new to you, please enjoy any of the single origin puns in the comments
Pilot on me!!
Então você acha que entende o argumento cosmológico?
Em http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2011/07/so-you-think-you-understand.html, se sobrar um tempo vou ver se começo a traduzir os livros dele. Eu cortei um pouco o começo por causa do limite do Reddit.
1. O argumento NÃO se baseia na premissa de que "Tudo tem uma causa".
Muitas pessoas - provavelmente a maioria das pessoas que têm uma opinião sobre o assunto - pensam que o argumento cosmológico é assim: tudo tem uma causa; então o universo tem uma causa; então Deus existe. Eles então não têm nenhum problema com os problemas óbvios nele . Se tudo tem uma causa, então o que causou Deus? Por que presumir, em primeiro lugar, que tudo tem que ter uma causa? Por que presumir que a causa é Deus? Etc.
Mas aqui está o engraçado. As pessoas que atacam esse argumento nunca dizem de onde o tiraram. Eles nunca citam ninguém que o defenda. Há uma razão para isso. A razão é que nenhum dos proponentes mais conhecidos do argumento cosmológico na história da filosofia e da teologia jamais apresentou esse argumento estúpido. Nem Platão, nem Aristóteles, nem al-Ghazali, nem Maimônides, nem Tomás de Aquino, nem Duns Scotus, nem Leibniz, nem Samuel Clarke, nem Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, nem Mortimer Adler, nem William Lane Craig, nem Richard Swinburne. E nem mais ninguém, que eu saiba. (Seu pastor Bob não conta. Não quero dizer ninguém entre os filósofos proeminentes.) E, no entanto, é constantemente apresentado, não apenas por escritores populares, mas até mesmo por alguns filósofos profissionais, como se fosse "a" versão "básica" do argumento cosmológico, e como se todas as outras versões fossem essencialmente apenas uma variação dele.
Não acredite apenas na minha palavra. O ateu Robin Le Poidevin, em seu livro Arguing for Atheism (que meu crítico Jason Rosenhouse acha que é uma coisa muito quente) começa sua crítica do argumento cosmológico atacando uma variação do argumento tolo dado acima - embora ele admita que “ninguém defendeu um argumento cosmológico precisamente desta forma ”! Então, qual é o ponto de atacá-lo? Por que não começar com o que algum defensor proeminente do argumento cosmológico realmente disse?
Suponha que algum criacionista começasse seu ataque ao darwinismo assegurando a seus leitores que a afirmação “básica” do relato darwiniano das origens humanas é que em algum ponto do passado distante um macaco deu à luz
... keep reading on reddit ➡
Nothing, he was gladiator.
Or would that be too forward thinking?
Dad jokes are supposed to be jokes you can tell a kid and they will understand it and find it funny.
This sub is mostly just NSFW puns now.
If it needs a NSFW tag it's not a dad joke. There should just be a NSFW puns subreddit for that.
Edit* I'm not replying any longer and turning off notifications but to all those that say "no one cares", there sure are a lot of you arguing about it. Maybe I'm wrong but you people don't need to be rude about it. If you really don't care, don't comment.
What did 0 say to 8 ?
" Nice Belt "
So What did 3 say to 8 ?
" Hey, you two stop making out "
