So bassically I was in my calc BC class and had my teacher say we’d forget these after the test except if we went into engineering.

So imma ask, how many trig functions/identities do you know without checking the internet, anything memorized is fair game so if you have the integral of secant memorized IG that counts.

Edit: I know the real world is open book but what do you just dont forget after constantly seeing it

E.g. d/dx sinx = cosx

For the purposes of this post, I’m going to refer to sexuality in the sense of sexual orientation, i.e., who you would want to have sex with. I honestly don’t have any experience with asexual people and don’t want to speak on their experiences at all, so they don’t appear in this, but I hope they are doing great. Again, for the purposes of this post, one’s gender identity will be what gender they internally identify as – no matter what they look like. This could be Male, Female, Non-Binary. Someone that is gay is someone that identifies as Male or Female who is sexually attracted to someone that is the same gender. This has seemed to me to be the way that talk about this sort of stuff.

The idea that someone can be whatever gender they want to be inside, no matter how they externally present or behave does not allow for people to define their own sexuality in the common terms of straight, gay, or bi. In fact, it directly contravenes these terms. For most people sexual attraction is some function of how people appear, how they behave, and how they present in society. It does not depend on how the object of the desire views themselves. If Natalie Portman viewed themselves as a male (having trouble with pronouns, sorry), it would not – such that no one else knew – change who found them attractive.

However, if you take the idea that gender is fully self-identified, then Natalie Portman’s new view that he (probably right in this context) was a male would then make large swathes of people now bi-sexual, or pan, or whatever they had additionally + men. Which invalidates their self-assigned sexual identity without their knowledge, which I see as not making any sense.

Further still, if gender identity is self-assessed and valid, despite external viewing of it, then how can anyone’s attractiveness to one another depend on that identity when may be unknowable to the person that is attracted. How can it be possible to differentiate people based on gender, via labels of Gay, Straight, Bi, etc. when the only one that can 100% know what gender identity is correct is object of attraction. At this point it makes no sense to even have gender-based segregation of sexuality.

I guess I’ll leave you with a hypothetical thought experiment – Schrödinger’s Sexuality? I’m a man who has only (so far) been attracted to women. I have a long-term partner, whom I love very dearly. Secretly, they start to identify as a man, but I am not to know. They don’t seek to change their life at

I get that it's more secure than previous methods, but it just takes forever to get through.

I have an Azure Function running PowerShell Core 7. All working fine and it connects to Azure with the System Managed identity no problem. The profile.ps1 file which you get has the section in it:-

if ($env:MSI_SECRET) {
Disable-AzContextAutosave -Scope Process | Out-Null
Connect-AzAccount -Identity
}

and everything seems to work. However when I use a user managed identity instead, it stops working. The Connect-AzAccount returns a 400 bad request. I can look in the developer console and see that the MSI_SECRET env variable is set after adding the user managed identity so I don't know what's wrong.

Is the user manage identity supposed to work in the same way as the System managed one?

These are all different labels.

Trigonometric Ratios, Trigonometric Identities, Trigonometric Functions

I'm not sure if they all mean the same thing because I know some are or is it a category system. From where I've read about they do sure come across as vague and doesn't explain exactly what is the difference of these

I know this would practically render a lot of obstacles useless, especially pallets, low hanging walls, and windows, but what if it was a thing?

What changes would you suggest in order for a universal short jumping function to exist in IDV?

New to automation and managed identities and wondering if there’s a good way to get the current “context” of the runbook. I would think it would be pretty straightforward to get the Resource Group, Automation Account, etc, but I can’t seem to figure out where that stuff is exposed.

What I’d really like to see is a way to retrieve the current cert info that you can get when you execute with a RunAs account with Get-AutomationConnection -Name 'AzureRunAsConnection'

I can pull the AccessToken easy enough with Get-AzAccessToken, which lets me authenticate to MgGraph and do general graph calls, but ultimately I want to be able to supply the MI certificate to the Connect-ExchangeOnline cmdlet.

I always understood the Borg as being a complete hive-mind, functioning in a similar way to Unity in Rick & Morty. In other words, they would all share one collective mind and each individual drone would act like a body part carrying out the will of the collective.

However, rewatching Voyager, this doesn't seem to be the case. Seven of Nine has her own title within the Borg ("tertiary adjunct" of some such...), and after she leaves the Borg, she retains her own memories from when she was a drone. For example, at one point she recalls how many hours she once went without regenerating. However, she does not retain the memories of the entire collective.

When she talks about her time as a drone, it seems more like she was connected to a network of other individuals who all worked together as a team, rather than her individuality actually being gone and just functioning as a body part of the hive mind.

I haven't really watched much of TNG (yet), but maybe the Lucutus arc would clarify this stuff for me in a better way. Can anyone help me make sense of what it's like to be a Borg drone, how a drone's individual consciousness interacts with that of the collective, and why Seven's memories operate in the way that they do?

Hello everyone, I'm still fairly new to the MBTI community, I found out about it in early February of 2021, I still don't know much about the Cognitive Functions yet, and I need your help to figure out who I am.

「INTRODUCTIONS」

• How old are you? What's your gender? Give us a general description of yourself.

>I'm a 20 years old Male. I was an Introvert ever since I was a kid, and I have trouble fitting in, and because of that, in the later years I faked myself into being an extrovert until I'm mentally exhausted.
>
>High School years were the hardest for me, I think I flew too close to the sun by trying so hard creating a perfect image of myself and forcing myself to be an extrovert, until one day I shut down over some stupid reason, I decided that I'm dropping out of there, lock myself up in my room with my computer, never talking to anyone ever again.
>
>And that brings us to this point..
>
>yep, I'm still locking myself up inside the same room xd

Alright, I think that's enough introductions, any more of that this post will get too long, I'll appreciate it if there's any questions to make it easier to figure out my type.

The first time I found out about MBTI was from Psych2Go's video about Signs if you're an INFJ, and it was the most relatable video I have ever watched, it was like every questions I have about myself got answered, and then I did some tests from 3 websites openpsychometrics, 16personalities, and 1 more that I can't remember, and sure enough I got INFJs on all 3 of them, and if I recall correctly 16personalities told me that I have a little bit of INFP in me.

Fast forward to 3 months later, I was browsing some MBTI memes on Reddit, and those memes about mistyped INFP and INFJ keeps popping up, it was kind of bothering me to be honest, so then I decided to take the test that was specifically made to decide if you're an INFP or INFJ, halfway through the test I was afraid of being mistyped, I mean why wouldn't I? after living for 20 years and finding out why I was the way I am, I felt like I belong somewhere for the first time in my life.

And the result said that I was an INFP all along...

To be honest I don't even know which one I am, I took another 3 tests on another 3 different websites, and I got ISFJ, ISFP, and INFJ...

Now don't get me wrong, I don't ever want to be an INFJ if I knew it was this painful being one, I wanted to stay an INFJ NOT because it will make me feel special for being t

I'm twenty hours into the game and have only taken down one tribal leader. I'm having a great time. One thing I realized is that the narrator is our little grasshopper robot friend. As Mooma says, he is from the old world and he records events. He shares information about the old world and my theory is that he is recounting the mutant's journey to us the player, and that is also why he translates dialogue. No spoilers, as I don't know if the ending reveals any of this or not, but that's the impression I got from the very beginning of the game. The thing is, I haven't heard a reviewer or anyone else mention this, and they complained about the narrator without understanding the narrative role he plays, or even who he is.

Attempt: https://imgur.com/a/nNSWxm8

I understood the Markscheme after realizing how they got the equation for x using the symmetry identities. But since cos( -A ) = cos( A ) shouldn't that mean I can take either A or -A in the final equation, why does only A end up giving me the correct equation for x? I might be doing something wrong here but this confused me.

Note ~ if my confusion here makes no sense I tried to make it clearer on the attempt

https://i.redd.it/thvnxea9lao61.gif

So this is more of just a fun post: I'm curious if anyone had any applications or ideas which used fractional operators . I also wanted to show of my gif.

A bit of background on what's in the GIF and fractional operators in general.

Recall that the 2D discrete Fourier transform, F, is a linear operator on a space of matrices (or d by d arrays). If we apply the Fourier transform 4 times it returns the identity function i.e. F^4 = F(F(F(F))) = I. Note that people have figured out how to let these exponents take non-integer values! This corresponds to fractional Fourier transforms. So for example the half Fourier transform F^(1/2) is something that functions like the square root of the Fourier transform. If we let G = F^(1/2) then we have that G(G)=F, or maybe a bit more concretely, for any matrix/image X, we have that G(G(X)) = F(X). These special exponents behave like regular old exponents in a lot of ways and it has been observed that one can construct F^a for arbitrary real-valued a.

The GIF I've posed takes an image of a pagoda X and applies increasing fractional degrees of Fourier transforms. Specifically the graph shows shows F^a (X) as a goes from 0 to 4.

Links, more on fractional operators

• Fractional fourier transform: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Fourier_transform
• It worth nothing that its possible to take the square roots of many linear transforms thereby making it possible to construct fractional versions of these transforms in a straightforward manner. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_a_matrix
• If you think this is cool you should also check out fractional calculus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus
  (Remember, the derivative is also a linear operator 🙂....)

Conclusion
I'm curious if anyone has any interesting ideas...

a lot of times I get tripped up with trick questions where a trig function is undefined at a certain point but u have to know that. do I actually have to memorize the domain and ranges for all the trig functions