Hierarchy Problem Puns

I have the following problem, I cannot remove the Primary Public Mailbox folder which was created by mistake with HoldForMigration value. I always get the error message: The mailbox "TOP" is the primary public folder mailbox for the users. To remove this mailbox, first remove all other public folder mailboxes.

https://preview.redd.it/87itqi1o25d81.png?width=597&format=png&auto=webp&s=11e3c46858908f94e376f4bd437c1d091b0cce99

The users are currently being migrated from on-premises Exchange to Exchange Online via RemoteMove Hybrid Migration and are still in sync status. I want to recreate all the public folder mailboxes in the cloud and not migrate them. The error could also come from the migration script from Microsoft which I used for a test.

Have tried the following things without success:

- AD-Connect Attribute Sync for Public Folders disabled.

- Remove Public Folder mailbox via Powershell with (Remove-Mailbox -PublicFolder -Identity -Force) Error: The mailbox "TOP" is the primary public folder mailbox for the users. To remove this mailbox, first remove all other public folder mailboxes.

- Delete and verify Public Folder Migration Jobs (Local and Online)

- Deleting all Soft Deleted Public Folder mailboxes

- Delete all MailPublicFolder

- Move Faulty PublicFolderMailbox to a new Datastore (New-MoveRequest)

- Change PublicFolderEnabled to Local (Set-OrganizationConfig -RemotePublicFolderMailboxes $Null -PublicFoldersEnabled Local)
Error: The PublicFoldersEnabled state must remain set to Remote while public folders are still locked for migration. are locked. Before you can change the provisioning of your public folders to "Local", you must first complete the migration of the public folders first.If you do not want to migrate your public folders, you can remove the existing public folder mailboxes and recreate them without the "-HoldForMigration" parameter.

Thanks a lot for your help :)

I noticed the bury feature wasn't working in my main anking deck after creating a set of filtered decks to catch up on studying. Then I noticed that the steps for my cards in the anking deck were also off. I triple checked my settings for the highest deck in the hierarchy and they were where I wanted them, and the bury feature was turned on for new and review.

Apparently, the problem lied within the subdecks of the hierarchy, they were all set to the default anki settings. After going into each subdeck within anki and changing the settings, I was finally able to get the bury function and my preferred settings to work.

From browsing this subreddit this seems to be a rare problem although it sounds like it's happened to folks before so hopefully this is helpful. It may also just be user-error on my part and I am missing something completely about anki. If that's the case any feedback would be appreciated.

I've been having a brainfart trying to solve the following problem:

In a company’s hierarchy, some employees manage other employees, who can in turn manage other employees. The input (as a string) format for the hierarchy is (name, sub-hierarchy_1, sub-hierarchy_2, … , sub-hierarchy_n), with every sub-hierarchy having the same format, recursively. Your task is to write code that parses the hierarchy, removes employees that are marked as “Unavailable” along with all the employees they manage and prints the resulting hierarchy.

Input: (“John”, (“Jasmine”, (“Jay”), (“Unavailable”)), (“Unavailable”, (“Jack”, (“Jeremy”))), (“Johanna”))

Output: (“John”, (“Jasmine”, (“Jay”)), (“Johanna”))

Note: The input must be read as a string

Any ideas how to solve it in the simplest way? I've been thinking tree in bracket representation, but the recursive part is really throwing me off and feeling like can't get past my idea

Hi, i've exported an animation from mixamo to blender for the purpose of using it in unity, but blender adds a parent in the armature making unity not recognize the skeleton and i get an error when adding that animation,

https://preview.redd.it/jmm29srcbun71.png?width=336&format=png&auto=webp&s=d90b3b88462436987e9572a16f1c1c2eeb930139

Any ideas how do i remove the Armature parent and take out mixamo hips?

Thanks in advance

Hierarchy itself is an organisational tool, and when used appropriately, a very valuable one. Even in anarchist or Communist scenarios, (the Internet Engineering Task Force, and the mailing lists for large open source software projects are the closest I have observed to this) you're still going to have people organised in some manner, with titles that correspond with their functions. This isn't to give people different levels of authority, but simply so that functional distinctions can be made, analogous to the different organs in the body.

The real problem is the alpha mentality, or what I call Harrison Bergeron Syndrome. This is a purely psychological condition, and while it may still have a degree of genetic basis, it is detrimental, unnecessary, and should be done away with. The problem is status seeking, and the desire to form elitist or exclusive groups. I am not opposed to elitism because I am anti-meritocratic, but ironically because I believe in meritocracy.

In the player community of virtually every computer game that I have observed, there is something deeply pathological which has more recently been referred to as the "meta," but which more honestly might be described as player consensus about the optimal manner in which to play the game in question. The advocates of promoters of said "meta," will attempt to argue that it is simply a case of mathematical objectivity; but the problem is, in my experience it only partly is. Meta adherence is a lot more about social acceptance and conformity, and the desire to avoid ostracision or psychological abuse if one's method or style of playing the game in question, differs from that which has popular approval.

World of Warcraft has the worst online community in this regard that I have ever observed. There is a profound and genuine sickness within the playerbase of that game, and it is a sickness which Critical Race Theory's advocates are right in wanting to erradicate. A desire to end the type of elitism which WoW's community embodies, represents the sole element of Woke ideology which I consider justifiable.

Again, it is the desire for status, and the vindictiveness and invention of artificial consequences for not having status, which is the problem. This has nothing really to do with either hierarchy or genuine merit; it is simply that the people who most stand to benefit from the status pathology, will attempt to use merit as

(Change the flair if needed)

Looking at most of bullying problems, I see that it is usually because of the hierarchy system. The difference between the US and Korea is that in bullying you can’t pull the race card but Korea’s population is mostly native Koreans. The hierarchy system in Korea is basically within family members, school mates , work place , and even in the street.

I remember many times when I wanted to get a ticket , an elderly woman just casually stood infront of me an got her ticket in 2 minutes but I had stand 15 mins and her breaking in made me stand more and basically I couldn’t talk because people will come at my a$$ because that woman is probably 70+. While I do believe that we have to sacrifice for elderly people because their health doesn’t allow them of exerting as much effort,HOWEVER, I believe that their should love and mercy on both sides. I have no pro with sacrificing my place for an elderly person but I have a problem with someone just bragging in with no respect.

Sometimes hierarchy is very unfair and causes a lot of problems because I might haven’t fight and just let it slide, others may not.

Now into my actual topic, for example Jimin (aoa) scandal. One of the reasons I believe Jimin shit was unstoppable is because she was the leader and being one of the oldest members that gave her much power and what shall the members do? If they attacked the company would say “you shouldn’t talk to the leader like this”. So I understand why would some members be bystanders because even if they weren’t nothing would have changed, the company will never leave the “leader’” side.

This situation might happen in schools due to the 선배 and 후배 system. I was lucky being in a strict international school that I spent my whole education time in it, also I had many foreigners and some of the school principals were also foreigners. But overall in Korean schools 선배 bullying 후배 is definitely a thing and 후배 were obliged to give 선배 their lunch, money, or anything they demand and usually the school isn’t that concerned tho luckily we have a court. The problem is...who has the courage to send their bully to the court? Not a lot.

In Korea schools’ time is long like let’s say the school ends at 2 or 3 pm , there is something called 학원 , which is an after school that the parents pay for their kids to attend after their schools so they might stay there until 7 or 8 pm. There are parents that pay for multiple 학원 and their kids might stay until 1 or 2 am

I’m in my first year of medical school and my program has a mandatory interprofessionalism course for students from all other departments (podiatry, pharmacy, PA, NP, CRNA etc). Today I read an email from the course director who mentioned a “hierarchy issue” in medicine.

I guess I’m confused because I thought hierarchy was important in medicine. The patient is the boss and they decide what the healthcare team can and can’t do, but doesn’t the healthcare team also need a leader? I know I’d personally feel better knowing the buck stops with one specific person.

I’m also wondering if the hierarchy issue is unique to American medicine or if it’s an issue worldwide so if anyone wants to chime in on this, I’d be grateful.

Its ACTUAL biggest problem is that they let students run around using their abilities anywhere, everywhere, at any time. With all the stupid fighting & the crazy bullying, the students have already more than proved that they're not responsible enough to be using their powers. It boggles my mind that Principal Vaughn is bothered by the low tiers getting mistreated but won't institute a rule as simple as "no using powers on other students outside of challenges/PE(?)/whatever or you'll get detention."

Especially since if he did, everyone would be forced on equal footing except high tiers with passives. Even then it wouldn't matter much anyway because it's way easier to address a minority of students about power inequality/misuse of abilities than it is to have to do it with the entire school.

TL;DR Principal Vaughn sucks and doesn't even know how to implement the quickest/easiest solution to his own problem.

But I guess if he did make a rule like this then 90% of the conflict would be over and we wouldn't have a webtoon

EDIT: After posting I just realized the fact that this isn’t a thing makes less sense than I initially thought. If too many students getting sent to the infirmary is a problem, why aren’t they cracking down on use of abilities, especially since sucking the fun out of everything is what schools do best? My old middle school didn’t let us chew gum because kids kept sticking them under desks and chairs, and yet in Wellston kids are getting hurt by the dozen every day and not a single adult does anything? Wild.

My problem with “abolishing hierarchies” is that it’s totally meaningless and anarchists really have no idea what a non-hierarchy is. the best answer I can get is “democracy”, but in my opinion that’s just a hierarchy towards the consent of the majority. If you want to call yourself a libertarian, fine, sure, but don’t mix it up with that confusing language like “abolish hierarchies” if you can’t reduce it into any meaningful praxis. Also, can you guys give me something to read that isnt idealist and not the good old classic anarchist (theyre great but read them all) and no post-left idiocy, thanks

My understanding of thr hierarchy problem is asking the question: Why is gravitational force much weaker compared to weak interaction, than weak interaction compared strong interaction or electromagnetism?

Coming from a more math based background, the relative differences in force strengths are just some numbers. To make the above question meaningful, you need to somehow define what a "big" or "small" is. But I have trouble making any sense of that, when these values are dimensionless. Chosing whether 10 or 10^30 is already enough for a "relatively big difference" seems pretty random and unjustified to me. So I feel that I am perhaps missing something important here?

From what I understand about this problem, physicists are concerned about why the gravitational force is weaker than the weak force by a factor of 10^24. This questions seems odd to me though. The force of gravity and the weak force are simply two different forces. Why should we expect them to have similar strengths at all? I've read it has something to do with a large fermi constant but I'm not really sure what that means.

For what it's worth, my background in this is that I've read the wiki page on the Hierarchy problem and have taken an intro class on high-energy particle physics

And drugs are the solution