Clue Movie Puns

Listening to the Audiobook gave me the same feelings I get from watching both those movies. Fun and full of twists and turns, comedy of errors, witty dialogue. Overall a very similar flavor. Highly recommend

That said, there are lots of possibilities. Temple of Doom was actually a prequel, showing that the filmmakers are not necessarily bound by some chronology. And with all the special effects around "de-aging" actors, who knows what they might do?

What'll it be about?

Time travel?

Something biblical?

Its anyone's guess. Maybe a clue or two will leak out soon.

Scream -

• The video store scene with Billy and Stu trapping Randy and looking sinister was a huge hint it was them.
• In the video store scene, Stu is trying to convince Randy that the killer is Sidney's father, which is exactly what the killer clearly wants everyone to think.
• After Sidney's attack, the next day at school, Stu, Tatum and Sidney are by the lockers and Stu is checking his face in a small mirror to see if he has any bruises after he attacked Sidney the night before.
• When Sidney is attacked, every other main character is present or mentioned at Sidney's house EXCEPT Stu. Sidney is attacked, Billy appears at the window, Tatum appears shortly after in her car, Randy is mentioned a lot on the phone, Gale arrives with Kenny soon after at the house, and Dewey and the Sherriff arrest Billy. Stu was the only main character who was not at the house - who else could it have been?
• When Randy, Stu and some of the other teenagers are watching a movie and Randy is giving the rules of how to survive a horror movie, Stu says he is going to get another beer. This means that he would've had to go to the garage, in which case he would have seen Tatum's body - why didn't he raise the alarm immediately? He was clearly alive and well when he and Randy ran up to Sidney by the front door later, so where was he all that time when he clearly would have discovered Tatum's body around half an hour to an hour earlier?
• Billy appears at the front door right after Tatum's death, the timing of which is suspicious.
• Billy's t-shirt has no holes in it when he's stabbed.
• Gale said that Cotton was framed, and said that Sidney must of seen someone resembling Cotton, but it wasn't Cotton. So it must of been someone who resembles Cotton in some way. When Cotton is seen on the TV, he has a very similar hair style to Billy.
• In the last scene before Principal Himbry is killed, we see Stu walking back towards the school while Sidney and Tatum walk away from the school to go home.
• In the first scene after Casey's death, Billy sneaks through Sidney's window and references The Exorcist. Who else do we know is obsessed with referencing horror movies? The killer.
• Casey's death almost has a sexual element to it, with the killer choking her and mounting over her. Stu was the only main character we knew who had a prior relationship with Casey.
• Stu is the one who sends Tatum to the garage to get him another beer - this was a clear set up so Billy could kill her when sh

I don't mean as in a mystery. I'm referring to that aspect of the theater showings, where there would be a different ending shown to each viewing, and no one could decide for sure how the movie ended because of that. Now picture a mod with multiple randomly chosen paths, none of which are interconnected in any way, and all of which are dedicated to a different one of the four dokis. No one could decide for sure what the mod was about, right? Well, I have plans. And I'm putting them here for suggestions, and will be starting work as soon as I can. I don't have access to all my previously created assets, so I can only hope the DDMC Google Drive has what I need.

Hello friends, please help me find a film I really wanted to watch again but I don't remember the title. It's almost ten years ago, the film looked pretty aged as well back then and I'm not sure if it's European because I cannot find it anywhere.

So, vaguely, there were two girls driving around a countryside or some kind of wood. They stopped at a gas station to fill some but the caretaker put things into the tank so the car broke down later. Both fell asleep inside the car on what I remember a pretty open area. Then one girl woke up to the car shaking, blood dripping from the front window followed by the head of her friend. She got out to face the killer wearing a weird costume and using moon shaped weapon. The killer looked mental. She got captured to a huge abandoned building and managed to trick the killer by put on a wedding dress that supposed to be his mother's. She hugged the killer and lit up the dress with a Zippo lighter, trying to escape the building but got caught at the end by the killer's father (or relative).

Okay, so I know this is a longshot but I'll try it anyway.

It's a Japanese comedy film shown somewhere around the mid 2000's.

The main characters are a Japanese baseball team who get into a variety of wacky situations.

One involves them being on an isolated tropical paradise. One of them points towards a scene/object (forgot what it was exactly) then laughing so hard that he "dies." He's buried at the beach, with funny burial scene and all, while still having his arm and finger pointing and above the sand. A crab passes by and pinches his finger and wakes him up.

The villain fires a pistol and a character pitches a baseball, the ball and the bullet collide causing the bullet to send out sparks like it was against the baseball like a grindstone. All of this was in mid air.

The last scene I remember was the baseball team about to deal with a kaiju formed out of garbage from the sea.

I hope someone knows what I'm talking about.

Some years ago, when there was an attempt to adapt Sandman into a movie, Neil had to step in to set the record straight on what Sandman was about to Warner Brothers. With the aid of artist Jill Thompson, they created a pitch/explanation as to what a Sandman movie should look like.

https://preview.redd.it/ay9qv8tzsum61.jpg?width=571&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=33ce5276297541513baaaadd1a6d281b5b33148a

Looking through this art we can piece together what the storyline pitch-planation contained. But not only that, I think it may hold clues as to what to expect from the Netflix adaptation.

From the art, we see a bunch of familiar story beats: the summoning that captures Dream, Destruction taking to the stars, and Lyta under the guidance of the Kindly Ones. But there is also a key change to some of these beats, as well as glaring omissions.

First, the omissions: it looks like most of the anthology stories were dropped (Dream Country, Fables & Reflections, Worlds’ End) in favor of longer story arcs. But we see nothing of the Season of Mist storyline or A Game of You. And I can understand why: it streamlines the narrative. Despite Season of Mist being a fan favorite, I don’t think a general audience would much care to watch a movie where an anthropomorphic dream king debates on which pantheon of gods should hold the key to hell. It works well for a comic book but might not be action-y enough for the populace. A Game of You lends itself better to adaptation because it’s a hero’s quest, but Dream is absent for most of it. It would be as if you paid for a Batman movie and he only shows up at the end.

This leaves you with Preludes & Nocturnes, The Doll’s House, Brief Lives, The Kindly Ones, and The Wake. With movies being all about trilogies this makes sense if you divide the stories. But how?

Neil has stated that the first season of the Netflix adaptation will consist of Preludes & Nocturnes and The Doll’s House. But we also know that Neil is looking to retell the story of Dream, while also updating it to today’s timeline. So that means we aren’t going to get a page-by-page adaptation of the comics, but something new. To achieve this, I think Neil is going to merge aspects of the story. The main change being the rep

Particularly in regards to black humor that isnt edgy but is whitty and makes you think. If your recc has any "problematic content" (transphobia, homophobia, ableism, secism, etc.) Please disclose so.

Edit: must show your work with answer.

And does that mean that the actors were aware that this other version was always out there because of an original script?

I was watching Espresso (S2 latest part) for about the 4th time on Saturday, watching carefully the scenes featuring the newly-arrived Gaggia, the cups, Sean's relationship (yes!) to it etc. - ostensibly to try to piece together whether I thought these scenes were all about 'the same day' - without knowing what the title of the part was (I don't normally take much notice of the titles I'm too avid to watch!) ... At the end of the episode when I was telling my daughter what I had been doing, she said "well, it is called 'Espresso'" ... Then it suddenly hit me ...

(NO SPOILERS IN THIS) The movie 'Gaslight' (from where we get the modern psychological concept of 'gaslighting' (popularly 'agreed' in the Servant-watching community to be one of, if not THE, theme in the programme) takes its title to point us, the audience (if we haven't seen it before) to take note of what happens in the movie with the literal gas lights ... why? because although the victim in the film notices what is happening, she doesn't understand what it means (whereas we the audience realise eventually DO realise this). The title of the movie is there to direct our attention to what is going on as a clue to the 'explanation' of the movie...

Likewise, every title of every part so far of 'Servant' is just one word - and it points us to what we need to watch/focus on in that part to further point us to what is 'going on'/has gone on/happened ...

So I now have a 3-part 'method' to watch and understand 'Servant': (1) I take note of the title and use it to direct my attention to (2) that thing or phenomenon denoted by the word that features in, and I'm supposed to be concentrating on, in that Part. Then (2) is a further 'pointer' to putting together the puzzle which, when pieced together, should give me (3) the 'finished picture' ...

We've tested this so far on all the Part titles ... it works! As my daughter and I already have our own theory of the ultimate solution to the 'mystery', we've used this method retrospectively to test out whether it works (in relation to pointing us to what we think that is). We believe it really does ...

So next time you watch and rewatch S1 and those parts of S2 we have been given already, have a go ... and keep noticing the titles and what they point to each time you watch a new Part ...

It's like being given a jigsaw puzzle in pieces and not yet knowing how to put it together to make the picture, but being clear from the individual pieces what they

Hi! I was wondering if perhaps some of you could help me. When I was a mere teenage girl (I'm in my 20's now) I watched A LOT of horror movies, all kinds, and I really do not remember the names of many of them. However there was one movie that was made, I think, by a bunch of college students that I am trying to find. It's not very on the radar because I've tried to google the plot details but found nothing. I thought it was so much fun and I really want to watch it again and you people here on this subreddit might know what I am talking about...

The plot was (from what I remember) some people on a buss got stuck in the middle of a desert and found a village where some Very Evil Man had brought back some real life serial killers to life to make some kind of murder park or something? It was very comical, for example the actor that was supposed to play a old man was just a college student dressed in a gray wig and glasses etc, so very low budget and slapstick horror...

Thank you so much in advance if you decide to help!