On May 10th I filed for divorce at the court of queens bench in Edmonton. This past week I got a response back that I have to make some changes on my application. This is fine.
But can someone tell me, do I have to go online and refill out the paperwork again or do I just amend and initial the original papers? There was no instructions one way or the other.
I tried calling the courts but “due to high call volume” they told me to hang up and call back later. And I don’t want to go all the way there and stand in line for two hours for a question that can be answered in two minutes, so I thought I’d take a shot and ask here.
Thank you.
From Justice R. A. Graesser, one of my favourite jurists. I particularly love the heading titles such as "One Oath to Bind them All".
Enjoy: https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2020/2020abqb489/2020abqb489.html
Citation: AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489
Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
The Alberta provincial court system has a new weapon in its anti-OPCA arsenal: cases can be identified as 'Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (AVAP)' based on specific criteria which include the panoply of multiply-tried and ever-rejected OPCA methodologies and indicia. If a case is designated AVAP, the presiding judge is empowered to review the merits of the case, identify specific defects, and require the plaintiff to show cause as to why the case should be allowed to proceed, thus keeping OPCA rubbish off the provincial dockets.
From what I can tell about the case proper, Jericho Labonte has been involuntarily committed to a mental hospital. Half the claim concerns his (presumably) delusional beliefs that the police have tried to assassinate him, the rest consists of his obvious and abusive attempt to use pseudolegal means to not only secure his release but enjoin doctors from making any further diagnoses and administering any further treatments to which he does not consent.
The new AVAP system effectively stops these motions in their tracks by requiring Labonte to make a proper submission free of pseudolaw. If he fails to show cause as to why his case should proceed, or continues to engage in pseudolegal behaviours, his case will be dismissed. In the interim, his access to the courts is curtailed for obvious reasons.
> My best guess is that Nikola Jokic will get a 2 game suspension from the incident last night. > > Jokic has been suspended only 1 time (leaving the bench) and his lack of on court incidents will certainly be taken into account. > > A suspension would cost him $210,417 (per game)
I am scheduled to go to court in early March to address a variance in a final order that was made in 2017. My child's father made the application against me, and he is requesting a variance in how much he must pay per month for support.
I am currently working as an essential worker that was due to be relieved/switched out this Friday. Unfortunately, the other medic had a emergency, and is now unable to work, and I am unable to be switched out.
Given that my court date is coming up, and I am now unable to present the documents and affidavits in my town's court house (I am over 8 hours away from this community) in a timely matter, I believe I need to change my court date for a later time.
How do I do this, with my circumstances? What should I do? I currently do not have a lawyer, as I am fully agreeing to the variance the applicant is asking for.
Any advice relative to Alberta is appreciated.
