A list of puns related to "Weak form and strong form"
Damon was able to bite and kill Tyler with ease and Tyler couldnβt even defend himself.
The transformations are part of the Triforce granting Ganon's wish, and I noticed that Blind became a powerful monster while Link became a defenseless bunny. Is the idea to turn good people into weak forms to prevent them from interfering with Ganon's wish while turning evil people into strong forms to help them serve Ganon?
Could some explain or give me some resources on when to use weak and strong forms in English? I've been trying to find something to learn from on the internet but sadly with no success.
Word "from" is an example of this; I have no clue when to use /frΙm/ and when to use /frΙm/. Same goes to "for" (/fΙΛ/ vs /fΙr/) and many other words.
To make things clear, I'm learning UK English so the examples above are the UK pronunciation.
This flowchart explains the differences, but doesn't really explain why they're called what they are, or what makes one situation "stronger?" than another.
http://www.andysthoughts.com/ShoresConjecture.pdf
Here's my understanding. If I'm off on the wrong track, please let me know what I'm screwing up. If I'm wrong enough, I might even delete this if it's grossly misleading.
Shore's Conjecture informs Final Jeopardy strategy for "First," the contestant in first place entering FJ. It is based on a prediction that Second will wager the maximum that keeps Third locked out, rather than wagering everything.
A "Shoretegic" wager is a wager by First that defeats this strategy by Second by just one dollar. The "conjecture" part of Shore's Conjecture is that this Shoretegic wager should yield empirically better results than betting to shut Second out.
In a "Weak" Shore game, a shutout wager from First would run no risk of falling behind Third, so the conjecture relies on the likelihood that Second will bet small enough as predicted.
In an "Intermediate" Shore game, a shutout wager from First would run the risk of falling behind a double-up wager from Third, so a Shoretegic wager looks even better in comparison.
In a "Strong" Shore game, a shutout wager from First would run the risk of falling behind a zero wager from Third, so a Shoretegic wager looks better still.
A Shoretegic wager will be defeated if:
a) Second makes a sufficiently larger-than-predicted wager, e.g. a double-up wager, and gets FJ correct, or
b) Second makes a sufficiently smaller-than-predicted wager, e.g. a zero wager, and First gets FJ wrong.
The "conjecture" part holds that Shoretegic wagering should empirically outweigh the risk of (a). But AFAIK, the conjecture does not address the risk of (b).
In this essay i will prove knack is communist propaganda.
Atheism and theism have strong forms (gnostic) and weak forms (agnostic). I'm pretty sure we have that too. In this case, strong is a measure of certainty.
So I guess weak form apathiesm would be "I don't really care whether or not God exists, but maybe I'm wrong and should care, but I don't."
And then strong form would be "I am certain that it doesn't matter whether or not God exists."
Thoughts?
When do you use one or the other?
Structurally, the strong form is just 'a me' vs. 'mi' right?
Does it make a difference is the 'a me' is before or after the noun?
If this is an inane question, please point me to a wiki where I can find this info.
Is it possible for many weakly plausible arguments arguing for the same conclusion, make that conclusion more probable?
For example, police may find evidence of a blood stain and propose an argument that it might implicate a suspect. However by itself, it may seem rather implausible to the jury. When there is many such evidence, such a fingerprint..., the conclusion seem more likely.
There must be something very wrong here. After all, we do not consider many weak arguments for god to favor the conclusion of god.
I know it has something to do with becoming before or after an article but i'm not completely sure about this
Like its not only an actual op legendary sitting right up there with mega rayqueque but is a very fun legendary.
Arteta (asked if βsome insideβ are still at the club) βNoβ
I dunno about you but I fall into every privileged category except for neurotypical (I am middle class in the UK but I dunno how important that is in privilege level) so I might sound quite privileged but I've still always felt way below everyone else. Whether black or white, male or female, gay or straight, short or tall...I've felt weaker both physically and mentally compared to everyone. I'm much taller now as an adult but as a kid and teen I was smaller than most others in school and less strong at things like sport despite playing it with other boys a lot.
I've noticed something that being an aspie causes that other forms of oppression does not which I think having it is far worse than many people might think. Your gender, race, orientation etc does not make you do anything wrong it attracts discrimination from bad people but me being an aspie has unintentionally caused a lot of people who would respect you like a bodyguard if you belonged to any oppressed group to get mad at me for making mistakes plus discrimination from bad people though it's mostly the former I have to deal with.
As usual I will never fucking apologize for those mistakes cause it feels so unfair how so many people do shit to me over the years and get away with it while I feel like I have to tiptoe through a mine field to not piss someone off. Someone else here said that also being a white male aspie they didn't feel supported by movements such as feminism or blm or gay pride cause they didn't fall into those demographics. I feel like him too like not belonging to the privileged or the non-privileged movements just kind of being stuck in the middle. We aspies have high rates of depression too I've suffered from it before. I hope one day there are movements for us like there are for others so I feel supported. Thanks for reading and if there is something you disagree about this post that I missed please let me know but carefully cause I'm very sensitive to criticism.
TLDR: cause being an aspie is a disability it makes life harder even without discrimination for me and I wish we got more attention
That's all I really have to say about that.
"Forest Gump"
r/Clov Army!
Hey everyone! I made a video talking about weak solutions to a PDE, or the variational form of a PDE. It's actually incredibly important for fluid dynamics because most often when doing CFD we only solve for the weak form of the PDE. And even then, we only know of weak solutions existing for the Navier Stokes, but that's not really ever introduced in undergrad, so I thought a video like this might interest people here. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have. Enjoy!
https://preview.redd.it/s0dghgq3i6g71.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=dfce374de3222bfe111e71cde1ecc98f66bb22fc
one supers rule is to have secret identity to not be stalked by enemies and toxic fans 24/7, some use eyewear, makeup, headsets or masks like incredibles that doesn't cover all the face
inko is defenseless, unless the emperor order her to grab the tv remote
unless they plan it like avengers, everyone know them in civilian
Hey everyone! I made a video talking about weak solutions to a PDE, or the variational form of a PDE. It's actually incredibly important for numerical analysis, fluid dynamics, astrophysics, atmospheric physics, etc, but it's not really ever introduced in undergrad, so I thought a video like this might interest people here. I'm happy to answer any questions you might have. Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQJkve_hnHk
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.