How is this a responsible thing to do, given that we're dealing with preliminary results and unknown interactions, rather than a robust, widespread clinical trial? Also, won't naming the particular drugs in such a public manner encourage hoarding by people who would otherwise have no knowledge of it? Shouldn't this information be reserved as much as possible to medical professionals, rather than being trotted out at press conferences?
I guess I just don't understand what's the point of any of this, what am I missing? Is it just grasping for a political win? And if so, why is Donald Trump the one using it, and not the Chinese, Italian or South Korean governments, whose health authorities seem to actually have made the recommendations based on their preliminary findings?
So I've been learning Ancient warfare and as well all know when a country/empire invades and destroys the opposition, the country usually takes control of the territory and establishes governmental control.
Now whether the victorious invading opposition decides to let the people of the state just live under their rule... or be enslaved or killed and the city razed is up to them. But usually the victorious (government) will gain some direct revenue or capital from either assets or resources.
Now let's take the American government's way of waging war...
There is a narrative that is made up to hype the American citizens to go to war. But before that, and which has been the case for the past 30 or 40 so years, the CIA or some other black ops will infiltrate and sell weaponns to extremist groups or rebels. All the while the American government is imposing sanctions and trying to ferment a civil war.
Wars are very nuanced but I believe 100% that the American Government is one of the major causes of any civil war in a country we subsequently "intervene."
The US leaves the country and establishes a puppet government to allow the American government and corporations get whatever they want from the country, people, etc... Pipline in Syria, Oil in Iraq and Kuwait, Possible war with Venezuela because oil rich country.
/tin foil hat
But here is the fucked up part I've come across... and yes this is a conspiracy but that doesn't mean it can't be true and it's not UFO and lizard people and shit.
So ancient civilizations could enslave a decimated population and gain direct profit or not but usually at a cost of running the government over the newely acquired territory.
Since the American government just leaves they don't have the overhead of governing a new territory. All the while corporations are being unregulated and essentially enslaving poorer Americans.
Entrenched run away Capitalism in America keeps Americans too busy (working more for less money). This is modern slavery to me.
So this is a big connection of two dots but I believe that American corporations and subsequently the American government doesn't need to enslave or hold territories because the American people are already enslaved and a much more profitable base than any amount of slaves you could possibly control. And almost non existent uprise or coup.
With the propogation of false narratives and a reusable strategy of sowing civil war in foreign countries, the American government and corpo
... keep reading on reddit ➡Introduced: Sponsor: Rep. Jackie Walorski [R-IN2]
This bill was referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs which will consider it before sending it to the House floor for consideration.
1 cosponsor is on that committee.
