I was on another post and someone brought up how many fakes there are and how do you weed them out. We are still fairly new and getting better at it. A few ground rules we have started to fallow are
Both must be pictured. We don’t need to see their face until we match or they give us access to their private photos but both must be in the picture and generally together in at-least one. We don’t look for singles so that’s a whole different ball game.
Details in the profile not just “horny and wanna bang” who are they, what do they like to do, what part of the lifestyle are they in, ect.
We will also try and drop an pic into google to make sure it’s not a generic stock picture people pulled or from a IG that has a ton of followers. We could be wrong but that’s a sign of stolen photos to us. If someone is a big influencer on social media and are not open about swinging then they probably wouldn’t use the same photos that so easy to link back to them.
That’s really all we have right now other then a gut feeling. What about you redit world. How do you weed out the fakes quick and effectively?
Help us learn more about the effects of cannabis use and age on one’s visual short-term memory.
We are looking for participants 55 years of age or older who use, have used, or have never used cannabis. The study involves completing a demographics questionnaire and a cannabis use or non-use questionnaire. Following the questionnaires will be a visual short-term memory task that involves the presentation of a black-and-white checkerboard pattern on a computer screen. The pattern will disappear after 3 seconds and the participant will then be asked to recreate the computer pattern by marking a blank paper grid. Patterns start off simple (2x2 grid with 2 squares shaded-in) and gradually become more complex (5x6 grid with 15 squares shaded-in). There are 3 patterns of the same grid size in each level of difficulty, and participants will proceed to the next level as long as 1 of the 3 patterns is recalled correctly. The study should take approximately 30 minutes and will be held at locations on the University of Saskatchewan campus or other mutually-agreed upon private locations in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
If you are interested in participating in this research project or if you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please contact one of the student researchers or our supervisor.
Student researchers:
Jelyssa Luc, jelyssa.luc@usask.ca; Samira Ibrahim, samira.ibrahim@usask.ca
Supervisor:
Dr. Jennifer Briere, Department of Psychology, (306) 966-4174, jennifer.briere@usask.ca
This study is being conducted in the Department of Psychology and has received approval from the Research Ethics Board at the University of Saskatchewan on 2019-02-24 (Psy-REC#: 19-031).
If they're not there for you now, they wouldn't have been with you when you need them in life.
Remember you are looking for you life partner, your constant, your "ride or die" that will be there no matter what.
You are looking for your mate in life. Forget the dirty cowards, you're supposed to get rid of those.
Next!
For those too young to remember, back in the days of linear television, Sweeps Weeks were special times of year when shows would be most heavily measured for ratings. These numbers were really important because they dictated the rates they could demand from advertisers. Shows would go all out to put their best foot forward, and by the late 90s and early 2000s this arms race got really extreme. This would be the week your favourite show would call up a huge guest star, or bring back a fan-favourite villain, do a crossover episode, or splurge on things like big VfX (in a time when that was rare on TV), a live to air episode, or original orchestral scores.
It was a bizarre distortion created only by the weirdness of TV as a business, but created some of my favourite 90s TV
(Sorry if format is weird, typing on mobile) Currently playing a heavily modded save, and decided to send a party on a long lvl 5 weald dungeon from one of the mods (to retrieve a lost relic trinket). I've never done this quest before, so wasn't sure what to expect. It was 1am, and my decision making was getting reckless. Im fully aware of how much of an idiot i was.
I send in a heavy-duty blight team: Pd . Pd . Occ . Sb
Most battles end before round 4, but stress is slowly starting to build up. I remember my SB still hasnt gone through all the nightmares, so i might get ambushed. I decide to skip camping for most of the dungeon. Occ gets afflicted, about halfway in. Then my Pds get afflicted like 4-5 rooms away from the quest curio. I decide to power through, and survived a few deaths doors and heart attacks (previous runs with an apostate made me overconfident).
I decide to camp, and the team indeed gets ambushed by a nightmare. No one dies, and SB is still in ok stress levels. I set up another camp, where the occ refuses to use his prevent ambush skill (which i knew he might do), and team gets ambushed. No one dies.
After 3 more battles, im at the door to the last room. High stress, ok hp, SB still hasnt reached 100 stress somehow. I wasn't expecting another battle, but there it was. Last room had a shrieker. And during the battle my SB finally reaches 100- focused. Hell yeah. I kinda guessed the outcome of this dungeon a few rooms back- 3 heart attacks- 2 pds and an occ now dead. SB survives, still in pretty great shape and finishes the quest.
She is now a legendary member of the Hamlet. The rest might return one day during a resurrection event...
Extra note:
One of the pds was previously part of an apostate team (pd . Lamia . Apostate . Leper). Currently the only surviving member of that team is the leper (Band had to break up after the apostate died).
It sounds like a weird comp, but i've run them from lvl 0 to lvl 6 quest after quest in a row with no stress relief breaks.
I miss them, but i think they might have really wanted to die already (after dozens of deaths doors and me overworking them).
